Imagine a scenario where a terrorist has hidden a bomb that will kill approximately 1000 people. It is your job to locate the bomb in order to save 1000 innocent civilians. You have captured the terrorist, but you discover that the only way he will give up the bomb’s location is if you torture his innocent daughter. Is it morally correct to harm one innocent person in order to save a thousand, or do you hold yourself at a higher standard to not harm a single innocent person? Before we analyze this let’s clarify a few details. Since this is a moral question and not a legal one, we can disregard that torture is illegal. We can assume that you will not be judged on your actions after the incident, you are only making a choice affecting other people 's lives and not your own. It is also important to assume that you are 100% sure that torture is the only possible way to save everyone, and you are 100% sure it will work.
According to a utilitarian, such as John Stuart Mill, correctness is determined by the best overall consequences. (Turner) Let’s look at the first option, torturing the innocent daughter, through the lens of a utilitarian. The pro of this option is saving the lives of 1000 innocent people. Th...
... middle of paper ...
...e that do not. We can have a discussion on which is more likely to work, but in the end you can never be certain your choice is best. Perhaps both decisions are morally correct if the person deciding believes their choice has the best chance to maximize happiness. In this sense, intentions are the only thing that matters when it comes to any moral question. For this situation the only person with bad intentions is the terrorist, therefore he is the only one making a bad moral decision.
This does not mean that torture is a good decision. I would say that in the majority of cases the use of torture does not lead to good information. The victims of torture are almost always from another country or culture and are portrayed to be enemies, which can easily create a system of institutional racism. Outside of a metaphorical example, torture almost never maximizes happiness.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Utilitarianism and Deontological Ethics. Utilitarianism is one of the best known and most influential moral theories. Like other forms of consequentialism, its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. More specially, the only effects of actions that are relevant are the good and bad results that they produce. Utilitarian Position • Act-Utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics which states that a person’s act is morally right if and only if it produces at last as much happiness as any other act that the person could perform at that time.... [tags: Morality, Utilitarianism, Ethics, Immanuel Kant]
706 words (2 pages)
- Utilitarianism, a book written by John Stuart Mill during mid 19th century in England, encompasses Mill’s major viewpoints about the constructs of pleasure and pain for human beings; as well as utility in itself as a way of promoting political and social goals. As Mill quotes, “A cultivated mind, that is any mind to which the fountains of knowledge have been opened and which have been taught to exercises its faculties-find sources of inexhaustible interest in all that surrounds it; in nature, art, poetry, history, and the ways of man of past and their prospects for the future” (Mill, Utilitarianism, p.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham, Ethics]
989 words (2.8 pages)
- According to Williams (94), most traditional codes of conduct consist of sets of rules about preferred types of actions. For example, the Ten Commandments focus on particular types of actions, prohibiting people from committing them. These forms of ethical codes are absolute, telling people to do or not to do rather than addressing exceptional circumstances. In fact, a majority of philosophical and customary moral codes consists mainly of absolute rules. In contrast, utilitarianism rejects the absolute, rigid based moral codes that categorize whole classes of actions as wrong or right.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Utilitarianism]
1084 words (3.1 pages)
- According to John’s Utilitarianism, Utility, or the Great Happiness Principle, are actions to promote happiness, which are our pleasures morally or physically. Life has no higher end than pleasure and pleasures should be the original and eventual goals for us to live a life (Utilitarianism). And one important point in John’s understanding to help answer the question about whether to prohibit the eating of animals is that, in his words, the happiness which forms the utilitarian standards of what is right in conduct is not the agent’s own happiness, but that of all concerned.... [tags: Morality, Utilitarianism, Suffering, Ethics]
1120 words (3.2 pages)
- Explain why Mill distinguishes between higher and lower pleasures and assess whether he achieves his aim or not. In his essay, Utilitarianism Mill elaborates on Utilitarianism as a moral theory and responds to misconceptions about it. Utilitarianism, in Mill’s words, is the view that »actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.«1 In that way, Utilitarianism offers an answer to the fundamental question Ethics is concerned about: ‘How should one live?’ or ‘What is the good or right way to live?’.... [tags: Utilitarianism Essays]
1395 words (4 pages)
- Utilitarianism is one of the best known and most influential moral theories. Like other forms of consequentialism, its main idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. More specially, the only effects of actions that are relevant are the good and bad results that they produce. Utilitarian Position • Act-Utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics which states that a person’s act is morally right only if it produces as much happiness as any other act that the person could perform at that time.... [tags: Morality, Utilitarianism, Ethics, Immanuel Kant]
1042 words (3 pages)
- Current utilitarianism was created by mixing Jeremy Bentham’s account for utilitarianism and John Stuart Mill’s account for utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham’s account for utilitarianism focused on pleasure. He defined utilitarianism by recognizing the fundamental role of pain and pleasure, approving or disproving the actions based on the amount of pain or pleasure brought on by the consequences, equating good with pleasure and evil with pain, and in return measuring whether pleasure exceeded pain.... [tags: moral theories]
1657 words (4.7 pages)
- MIll presents a form of hedonism that is quite contrary to its usual connotation. His "utilitarianism" is a principle stating that every person desires more happiness than pain and that actions are moral if they are condusive to this desire. Utilitarianism is empircally based, or centered around observation. Rather than seeking pleasure in any form, Mill contends that some pleasures are greater than others. He believes that, as humans, we are capable of intellectual pleasures rather than simple animal pleasures, and that these intellectual pleasure provide much more quality, which is far superior to quanity.... [tags: Ethics, Virtue ethics, Morality, Virtue]
1154 words (3.3 pages)
- This work has probably received more analysis than any other work on utilitarianism available. However, I seek to do here what many others have been unable to accomplish so far. I hope to, in five paragraphs, cover each of the chapters of Utilitarianism in enough depth to allow any reader to decide whether or not they subscribe to Mill's doctrine, and if so, which part or parts they subscribe to. I do this with the realization that much of Mill's deliberation in the text will be completely gone.... [tags: Literature Review]
1084 words (3.1 pages)
- Every day we are confronted with questions of right and wrong. These questions can appear to be very simple (Is it always wrong to lie?), as well as very complicated (Is it ever right to go to war?). Ethics is the study of those questions and suggests various ways we might solve them. Here we will look at three traditional theories that have a long history and that provide a great deal of guidance in struggling with moral problems; we will also see that each theory has its own difficulties. Ethics can offer a great deal of insight into the issues of right and wrong; however, we will also discover that ethics generally won’t provide a simple solution on which everyone can agree (Mosser, 2013)... [tags: virture, utilitarianism, deontology]
1435 words (4.1 pages)