Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Types of research
Different research methodologies
Focus group benefits in research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Types of research
It has been decided to focus on to explain on a personal experience whereby focus groups produced positive or negative information hence anticipated as of other types of research. The importance of Focus groups providing better, or worse, information this is highlighted by Pitt-Catsouphes et al, 2006 (p.365) who states that focus groups “offers the advantage of creating inductive insight, and these insights can then be later used in the development of quantitatively instruments such as surveys”, Duarte et al, (2006, pg.202) adds that researchers may still disagree on the members emphasis.
Four main aspects Focus groups will be discussed. First, a personal experienced researched focus group conducted in a lecture. Following that, the positive or negative information gathered at the meeting and examples of other Focus groups will be discussed. Finally, there would be examples of other forms of research which would be compared to Focus groups.
First, nevertheless, it will be significant to define the research term “focus groups”. Focus groups are comfortable practice in other word casual method which helps to consider group members opinions and sentiment related with the topic before and after the policies has been applied.
The origin of focus group it was created when Paul Lazarsfeld invited Robert Merton in the office of Radio Research at Columbia University 1941, later after the World War II Robert Merton used his method to the analysis of Army training and moral films for research branches of the U.S Army Information and Education Division, shortly Merton modified his methods for use in both individual and group interviews.
Stewart et al, 1990 (p.10) from his own statement he defines Present’s focus group compare...
... middle of paper ...
...ing its role as it should be or not?” I believe everyone would have something to say as the majority of the world is concerned about the endless and deadliest wars and poverty in Africa.
Works Cited
Duarte et al, 2006, ‘Mastering virtual teams: strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed’, Ed: 3th. Published: John Wiley and Sons, ‘pg.202
D.L.Morgan 1997, ‘Focus Groups As Qualitative Research’, Ed: 2nd. Published: SAGE 1997, (p.2)
Pitt-Catsouphes et al, 2006, ‘The work and family handbook: multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches’ Published by: Lawrence Elbourn Associates 2006, (p.365)
Stewart et al, 1990, ‘ Focus Groups: theory and practice’, Vol: 20th, Published: SAGE 1990, (p.10)
YouTube: ‘Luntz Focus Group Says Tonight's Debate Won By...Obama!’ – Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcDc-bUYFPI- Accessed: 08/01/2011
The first, focus groups, interviews conducted with 8 to 10 people with a trained moderator following an interview guide, a common useful approach for acquiring health care information. Also, useful in examining a wide range of sensitive health care issues. Second, probability sampling, units selected by chance, the sample’s reliability, and does not require detailed information about the population surveyed. The third option, mail surveys, inexpensive way to contact individuals over a large geographical area, provide anonymity to the respondent, and eliminate interviewer bias.
The process of forming virtual teams is very crucial and plays a significant role in the success of a virtual team, since the team members can be formed from virtually anywhere. As such, the management of the particular organizations needs to take significant care in the formation of virtual teams. Lerner (2008), did say that the leaders of distributed teams should have a heightened sense of awareness of the various subgroup formations and their weaknesses”. Thus the formation of virtual teams is critical to ensuring the objectives for a given project are met and the chemistry of the team is proper to achieve given goals. Karayaz (2006) did define thr...
The current study will be conducted through the focus group method. It was deemed appropriate for the research investigation because, focus groups are a distinctive and convenient¬ method for gathering qualitative data. They explicitly use group interaction as a part of the method. It encourages participants to be active and exchange their knowledge and ...
A better use of the focus group method would have been to collect the responses of the PTs to the direct research question at the start of the study and again at the end. Doing this could have added much-needed validation to the process and results of the study. Procedures The author does a very good job of outlining the procedure. The procedure process is in detail enough to be replicated.
Morgan D., (1993), Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications
Based on the survey conducted, my analysis of existing peer reviewed articles written on this there is apparent a number of areas that are sources of conflict between both groups. Understanding these issues is valued because
Neuman (2014, p. 470) explains that focus groups provide a natural setting for participants to not only share in the free flow of opinions, but also engage and interact with one another’s responses. In addition, Rabiee (2004, p. 655) describes focus groups as an important method of involving clients in designing and developing practice approaches and evaluating services. While the aim of this study is to identify supportive responses and attitudes that enhance the process of disclosure, it will also reveal negative responses, attitudes and behaviours that act as barriers to disclosure. Ultimately, the study hopes to increase the effectiveness of IPV intervention by HPs so that women may gain access to timely and appropriate support to increase their safety. To achieve this aim, the study uses a qualitative design and a phenomenological framework in the form of focus groups to gain the perspectives of IPV survivors through their lived experiences and contact with HPs (Neuman 2014, p. 103; Yüksel & Yildirim 2015, p. 1). Specifically, the use of focus groups is considered an appropriate method for this study because it provides a platform for open expression and interaction through shared experiences
A virtual team is a group of people working interdependently via various types of electronic media across organizational and geographical boundaries for a shared purpose (D’Souza & Colarelli, 2010). Research indicates virtual teams are becoming increasingly popular in organizations across the United States and the world (D’Souza & Colarelli, 2010; Rusman, van Bruggen, Sloep, & Koper, 2010). These teams vary in size, degree of geographic dispersion, prior shared work experience, nature of assignment, and expectations of a common future (Rusman et al., 2010). Although virtual teams have potential advantages like the removal of physical boundaries, the ability to form new partnerships, and optimization of competencies (Chinowsky & Rojas, 2003), they also introduce many challenges that may not be as prevalent in traditional teams.
Thomas, D., Bostrom, R. P., & Gouge, M. (2007). Making knowledge work in virtual teams. Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 85-90. Retrieved June 13, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.
Four focus group discussions (FGDs) with students from both Universities were carried out. In each University two focus group discussions comprising of 10 students grouped by gender were conducted. The number of FGD was guided by data saturation. By the time we conducted the third and fourth FGD we noticed that issues already identified earlier were being repeated and there was no need for further discussions. The FGDs were used to understand the magnitude of substance use and risky sexual behaviour as well as the commonly abused substance so as to guide in the designing of the intervention and also supplement the data from the survey.
While traditional focus groups and their face to face method of collecting data has proven to be effective, the internet has proven to be both more effective and more convenient. A traditional focus group normally consists of about 10 people, while an online group can reach thousands of participants. The DiscoverWhy group is one such group that holds online polls and focus groups for various companies. In order to test the effectiv...
There are a number of challenges involved in working with a virtual team, however. When team members do not have the benefit of observing body language, vocal inflection, eye contract and other such mannerisms, it is difficult to establish trust. Not to mention the distance and lack of tangible contact makes it more difficult to connect with other members enough to truly gain insight and perspective regarding their character.
Virtual teams – virtual team is one of the most popular teams in every organization because in virtual team the member are separated in different nation and use technologies to communicate to accomplish their goal on the time.
The focus groups were transcribed by the third author and a thematic and semantic analysis was conducted (Berne, Frisén, & Kling, 2014). The transcription process allows the authors to be able to look at all the data for analysis.
As large numbers of married couples work outside the home and have parenting responsibilities, their multiple roles have grown. Therefore, the combination of work and family roles generates a spillover of stress in these two areas. Balancing work and family is both a female and male issue. The demands of work pull them away from family intimacy, while the demands of family pull them in. Either extreme can be problematic for individuals and their intimate relationships.