A fat tax is the most effective way to fight obesity for the same reason that the tobacco tax caused a decline in the usage of tobacco products. The counter argument to this would be that the effectiveness of a fat tax in obesity is not proven and when Denmark implemented a fat tax it did not cause any major change to the obesity in the nation. The fat tax in Denmark was carried out for about one year and Denmark is also part of the EU so Danes could buy the affected items from other nations in the EU that does not have the fat tax without much friction. Tobacco tax was effective for many factors, but the key factors is by...
... middle of paper ...
... but effectiveness of the policy can be improved if a subside to promote a healthy diet is used as well. The economic impact of obesity is enormous, especially the medical impact as obese people will be spending a greater part of their income to pay their medical bills and could affect the person’s ability to perform their job which can cause them to have a lower income. The government normally leaves their citizens freedom to do anything if they follow their laws, but when there is a problem like obesity or widespread pollution that only a government has the resources to solve then it has an obligation to prevent the problem from reaching critical mass. Overall, the fat tax is the best option as a ban will likely lead to an increase to the underground market like what happened with alcohol in the prohibition era and just using public outreach has not been effective.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- If you want to indulge yourself with chocolate today, would you still get it if the tax was higher. That is what the government is proposing to do: tax junk, fast, and fat foods because they may lead to obesity and other health issues. This type of tax is often referred to as a sin tax, which is "a sponsor tax that is added to products or services that are seen as vices such as, alcohol and gambling” (citation). One controversy to this issue is how does one determine what products are considered high in fat or sugar.... [tags: Nutrition, Health care, Health, Tax]
796 words (2.3 pages)
- Junk food is a favorite in this society. Fast food restaurants make it easier to grab food on the go. The greasier or sweeter food is the better. But junk food and sugary has caused many health problems. If there was a junk food tax, the government was target foods that contain partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, foods that the main source is salt, energy drinks, caffeinated beverages and foods, and soft drinks with high sugar content.(Todorova, Elena 1.1-1.4) I believe adding taxes to junk food could help the decrease many health problem, but I will do more research before I make a decision.... [tags: Nutrition, Junk food, Food, Tax]
1424 words (4.1 pages)
- Imposing a tax on high calorie beverages and junk foods is not a practical solution that will cure America’s obesity epidemic. This action would have more of a punitive effect on low income individuals and would do little to motivate those with higher incomes to curb their excessive consumption of empty calories. There are alternative actions that our government can implement to encourage positive behaviors, such as increasing the availability of public greenways and other venues for physical activities.... [tags: unhealthy eating habits, obesity, healthcare costs]
1206 words (3.4 pages)
- ... At the equilibrium of Qe the social benefits of consumption are less than the marginal private benefits and social costs which shows that society is benefiting less than the actual consumers of the good. Society would benefit where MSB = MSC, at this point we have eliminated the external costs. Without any government intervention in the fast food/sugary beverage market, resources are over-allocated at Qe, which creates spillover costs equal to the distance between the marginal social benefit and marginal private benefit.... [tags: obesity rates, mexican government]
760 words (2.2 pages)
- For years, the United States government has been trying to find a way to lower the obesity in the country. However, the approach it is using, i.e. taxing unhealthy food, is not the most effective one. People are going to purchase whatever products they wish, whether the price is increased a few cents or not. Junk food options are already set at a more reasonable price than healthy foods, enticing people to buy these less expensive goods. Even though putting a tax on other products, such as tobacco, has served the intended purpose, food is a necessity humans must have for survival.... [tags: obesity, United States, food, health, government]
1312 words (3.7 pages)
- ... BODY: I. The “Fat Tax” or tax on food that contains more the 2.5% saturated fat, according to the Herald Sun in 2013. A. According to the National Library of Medicine, American’s can be and are addicted to high fat food and because of this addiction; Americans have wasted over $1 Trillion on the food and beverage industry. B. This tax is copying the anti-tobacco campaign, and they are also trying to overcome the advertising of soda and junk food in hopes that is will make consumers choose the alternative.... [tags: obesity, fat tax]
734 words (2.1 pages)
- Canada has a problem with obesity and a solution should be established. Junk food is easily accessible and because of this, low-income families are more likely to buy bigger quantities of it due to lower costs. Obesity can lead to diseases and serious illnesses, some of the most likely illnesses to get from obesity include Type 2 Diabetes, Uterine Cancer, and Gallbladder Disease. While these illnesses and diseases are bad, the population of people that have them can be decreased by decreasing the amount of sugary, carbonated, and high sodium foods humans consume.... [tags: Nutrition, Health, Obesity, Junk food]
1852 words (5.3 pages)
- In the United States, 23.5 million adolescents are either obese or overweight. Further, according to the World Factbook, obesity affects 35 percent of the United States adult population. Obesity, by definition, doesn’t adversely affect the health of its victim; however, complications that arise from untreated obesity (Ventricular tachycardia, poor cardiovascular fitness, high cholesterol, heart failure etc.) can. Therefore, recognizing obesity as a serious malady, and allocating appropriate programs to prevent it, is essential in restoring the overall health of the United States.... [tags: Nutrition, Junk food, Private sector]
1645 words (4.7 pages)
- A study was conducted to calculate what percent of Americans were obese. The results were shocking. In the year 1980, all of the states had an obesity rate of less than 15%. Just 20 years later, none of the states had an obesity rate of 25% or more. Now, in the year 2014, 41 states have an obesity rate of at least 25% (Nordqvist). The obesity rate has doubled since 1980, from 15% to 30%. Unhealthy foods, such as junk food and fast food, are the leading cause of obesity and health issues. To prevent diseases and further growth in the obesity rates, a tax should be placed on junk foods.... [tags: Nutrition, Obesity, Junk food, Fast food]
1003 words (2.9 pages)
- determine if imposing a tax on junk and fatty foods is the right thing to do. This report analysis both the pros and cons of imposing a tax, as well as a financial and ethical considerations when determining the final outcome. Both the pros and cons were analyzed but one decision seems to be the clear choice. Situation There has been an ever-increasing concern on obesity and overall health especially towards the next generation. There has been a steady increase in obesity from “2003 to 2014 with men obesity and overweight rate rising from 57.3 percent to 61.8 percent and woman 41.3 percent to 46.2 percent” (Ferrers, 2015).... [tags: Nutrition, Junk food, Health, Revenue]
1581 words (4.5 pages)