Existentialism In The Epic Of Gilgamesh

1264 Words3 Pages

The Epic of Gilgamesh is incorrectly considered to be the very first existentialist story. Centering around the titular king Gilgamesh, the epic follows his journey from being a self-obsessed tyrant to a great ruler, through the realization and acceptance of his own mortality. Scholars such as Micah Sadigh tote The Epic as a fundamentally existential text because of the lessons it teaches about responsibility and actions. However, using Sigmund Freud’s Civilization and its Discontents and interpretations of what existentialism is, The Epic cannot be viewed as an existential story, but rather a cautionary tale about society overpowering human aggression. According to scholars such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Alasdair MacIntyre, and Erich Fromm, existentialism …show more content…

Sadigh claims that Gilgamesh’s change is an existential one because he chooses to change himself. He claims that Gilgamesh contains “a powerful depiction of the concept of alienation, which plays a significant role in the existential literature” (Sadigh, 79). This alienation is in reference to Enkidu’s separation from the animal kingdom after his escapade with Shamhat. This alienation is not, however, innately existential. Enkidu’s transformation is towards humanity, and in doing so he loses his individualism and his primal aggressiveness. Henceforth, all of his choices will be influenced by his company, such as when he decides to kill Humbaba after Gilgamesh eggs him on. Later, Sadigh states that Gilgamesh “finds serenity in knowing that what matters most is his commitment to others, which is ultimately where he finds the purpose in his existence” (Sadigh, 85). However, Gilgamesh does not choose to serve the people because he thinks that doing so would fulfill him, he does this because he realizes that he is a part of his people. Ergo, Gilgamesh’s choice was not an existential one, but more of a Freudian

Open Document