The Ever Evolving Superweed

885 Words2 Pages

This article shifted my understanding because it explained how much resistance weeds have gained due to of the use of GM crops and encouraged me to investigate further into the rise and existence of the super weeds. The article explained that farmers are having to use more herbicides and spend more money because of the increase in weed resistance; when GM crops were initially meant to deplete the problem (Pieper). After realizing this, I started to dwell on the fact that these GM crops weren't effectively completing the tasks they were meant for, and instead more chemicals were having to be used on those weeds; this is where I started to grow concern for human health (Pieper). I don't believe the answer to this problem should be to use more herbicides because the overuse of those chemicals could be a risk to human health and crop lands. There must be somewhere else farmers could turn. This directed me to look further into how exactly super weeds came about. At this point, I wanted to expand my knowledge on super weeds in order to comprehend the other concepts of this article, such as why farmers are having to use more chemicals, and the base of super weed existence.

As I researched further, I found the article, “US Farmers Using More Pesticides With GM Crops," which was written by Philip Case and was published on October 26, 2012, in Farmers Weekly. This article brought me further into my investigation because it covered what the initial purpose of GM crops had been, and how that has altered since the introduction of herbicide resistant crops in the 1990s (Case). I began to learn how herbicide resistant crops specifically work. It explained that GM crops main producer, Monsanto, created GM seeds that include the herbicide resist...

... middle of paper ...

...to understand how farmers and scientists were trying to fix the problem (Grunbaum). It suggested that farmers could try to use more than one herbicide in order to stop the weeds from conquering the roundup alone, but I feel this strengthens my argument even more because if GM crops are designed to reduce the work farmers need to put into weed management, and they are no longer effective in doing this because they require a second herbicide, then what is the point in using them in the first place (Grunbaum)? Why would farmers want to use this method if in the long run it will cause further weed resistance, and thus further weed management for the farmer? This is where my interest arose in looking at the long run results of GM crops compared to their short run result, or in other words, Monsanto's short run intended results, versus their long run unintended results.

Open Document