But when we look at a retributive style sentence there are also many concerns of are we just throwing that person in jail without getting them the help they need. The type of crime committed and the offender always need to be looked at in depth in any criminal case. Removing the racial disparity aspect of sentencing is something that will take time to overcome, but I feel can happen. There are structure and guidelines for sentencing, but judges have huge discretion when it comes to sentence they impose on an offender. Depending on the crime and the offender each sentencing option should be looked at.
The structured sentencing models were created in order to remove the faults of indeterminate sentencing. Determinate sentencing is a fixed set of incarceration dates for judges to decide upon. The judge uses fixed terms based upon the crime that was committed. The set term to serve can be reduced by help of parole or good behavior. Unlike indeterminate sentencing, in determinate, the offender actually knows when he or she will be released from jail.
They calculate the time a case will take from past experiences, then they will determine that the shorter case be given priority over longer cases. This gives us a direct insight how the police view the different types of defendants. Within the court their is set procedures to deal with the influx of large numbers of people. When court is in session, court officials work at considerable pressure. They have to work in various roles such as the detaining of prisoners in custody and have to preserve the law as it is invested in them.
Despite unwise choices a person decides to make no one deserves for their human rights to be violated. Both the government and the criminal justice system must commit to reform it in order to decrease over populations in prison. Prisoners incarcerated are there to experience rehabilitation, and to pay for the crime they committed. There are ways payback and rehabilitation can be enforced with always resolving to incarcerate someone. The criminal justice system should evaluate each case to determine the best place to place an individual in the hopes of make society a safer place.
Any person who has been declared guilty of crime must be punished, as these punishments such as incarceration, costly fines or in some instances both. However, persons found liable in a civil case may only have to give up property or pay money, but they will not be incarcerated. A suggested underlying cause of crime is the amount of edu... ... middle of paper ... ...'t have to pay so much for incarcerating offenders - as the amount of criminals committing crime will definitely increase. This solution will definitely be useful as the government is already funding so much for crime. In conclusion, upon investigating these solutions, it was evident that the government should evaluate the small risk factors rather than constantly trying to fix the larger and more complexed problems.
In response to the growing public concern over criminality, politicians have adopted a Tough on Crime approach when dealing with law breakers, and have pushed for new legislation to keep criminal offenders from further harming or terrorizing society. Citizens believe that it is only fair that criminal pay for their actions and get what they deserve. These new legislations have set sentencing requirements for different offences, which can be found in the state’s penal code. Sentencing’s affects In the past judges had more discretion when handing down sentences, but most recently they have been encouraged to follow the sentencing guidelines found in their state’s penal codes. Prior to sentencing offenders judges are required to choose from a range of mandatory sentencing ... ... middle of paper ... ...hese offenders consisted of individuals who had committed petty crimes, and have never had any prior convictions.
Introduction With the society that most individuals are offered today, the world of crime has been constantly transforming. This can influence the typical individual to question if there are too many laws that one should follow, including the penalties that are to be expected. The word crime can insinuate many thoughts of apprehension, segregation, and security when applying the law in accordance to criminal acts being prosecuted. In order for penalties to apply to a particular individual, law enforcement must first be able to track and identify suspects of various crimes. Numerous approaches can be offered for this process, but profiling is a common tactic that has aided law enforcement in seeking justice for both suspects and victims.
However, the United States penal system evolved in such a way that the rehabilitation of offenders became the primary focus instead of punishment as the main objective. Today, the correctional system offers different alternatives to imprisonment. For example, parole is “the conditional release of inmates by a parole board prior to the expiration of their sentence”. (Seiter, p. 149). I believe that parole is a better alternative to imprisonment because the offender is still serving time for the crime they committed, and if the offender becomes eligible for parole he or she could be released from prison early.
By doing this, criminals who should have been spending time in jail, were let free and often went on to victimize others instead of using their second chance for good. While the above two claims may make mandatory minnimum sentences seem like a positive and much needed law, what they are failing to mention is the negative social, economical and emotional effects that mandatory minimum drug sentences have on not only the person who committed the crime and their family, but on the nation as
The courts are put in place so that the judges can decide whether to release offenders before the trial, except or reject plea agreements, or sentence convicted offenders (Hoffmann, 2011). The courts provide a set of guidelines that are used to resolve disputes and to test and enforce laws in a fair and rational