Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Zero tolerance policy is today's need
Zero tolerance policy case
Zero tolerance policy is today's need
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Zero tolerance policy is today's need
Contemporary Issue Paper
Zero tolerance has become the latest contemporary educational issue for the Christian school leader. Zero tolerance policies mandate predetermined consequences for specific offenses. According to a government study, more than three quarters of all U.S. schools reported having zero tolerance policies (Holloway, 2002). Systematic guidelines of enforcing zero tolerance require educational leaders to impose a predetermined punishment, regardless of individual culpability or extenuating circumstances (Gorman & Pauken, 2003). Ethical decision making and the opportunity to apply Biblical principles have taken a back seat to reactive discipline by school leaders. Societal expectations have forced proactive educational leaders to become impulsive decision makers.
Legal Expectations
Zero tolerance is a policy that mandates predetermined and severe consequences for specific offenses in an attempt to consider all offenders equally (Fries & DeMitchell, 2007). Zero tolerance began as a Congressional initiative to control drugs, weapons, and violent behavior in the early 1980s and was well known across the country by 1988. It can be traced to the federal Gun Free Schools Act of 1994. The Gun Free Schools Act of 1994 requires states to have in effect a law mandating schools to suspend students for possessing a weapon on school grounds. Students violating this act are suspended for one school year and enter the juvenile justice system (Stader, 2004). The Gun Free Schools Act permits school superintendents to modify the expulsion requirement on a case by case basis allowing states to enact their own statutes. The zero tolerance policies in most states include the Gun Free Schools Act of 1994, as well as gang acti...
... middle of paper ...
...Viewpoints from the classroom. Journal of Law and Education, 36. Retrieved December 2, 2011 from ProQuest database.
Garbarino, J., Dubrow, N., Kostelny, K. & Pardo, C. (1992). Children in danger. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jobe, D. A. (2003). Helping girls succeed. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 66.
Henault, C. (2001). Zero tolerance in schools. Journal of Law and Education, 30. Retrieved December 2, 2011 from ProQuest database.
Holloway, J. H. (2002). The dilemma of zero tolerance. Educational Leadership. 59(4), 85.
Ma, X. & Willms, J. D. (2004). School disciplinary climate: Characteristics and effects on eight grade achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 169-188.
Stader, D. L. (2004). Zero tolerance as public policy: The good, the bad, and the ugly. The Clearing House, 78. Retrieved December 2, 2011 from ProQuest database.
Ward, H. et al, 2012. Safeguarding babies and very young children from abuse and neglect. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. P 205.
If you did not know, the zero tolerance policy is when students break school behavior rules and strict regulations created by the district or school and get severe consequences for it. Carla Amurao, the author of the article, “Fact Sheet: How Bad Is the School-to-Prison Pipeline?”, stated that “statistics reflect that these policies disproportionately target students of color”. Students of color are being affected so badly by this policy, that statistics show black students are 3 times more likely to get expelled than white students. Since these students are being expelled or arrested for breaking zero tolerance policy rules, they are missing valuable information in classes due to court hearings. But, some people argue that the zero tolerance policy is unfair to all students, making the education system equal for all to succeed. For example, a “2007 study by the Advancement Project and the Power U Center for Social Change says that for every 100 students who were suspended, 15 were Black, 7.9 were American Indian, 6.8 were Latino and 4.8 were white”. As you can see, the zero tolerance policy affects all races, making them miss their education because of certain consequences. Because the mindset of these people is that, if the zero-tolerance policy does not affect just one race or group of people, then the education system
Hurley, Jennifer (1999). Child Abuse Opposing Views . San Diego : Greenhaven Press, Inc. print.
Students that have been labeled “delinquent” need help in beating the odds to become successful adults. As C. Ogletree discusses article, Total Reform for a Broken System, a program needs to be created that includes family involvement and support to create concrete goals and means for students to achieve them, in the aim of becoming successful students throughout each school until graduation. It is a great goal for school institutions to strive in changing students’ behavior for the better, giving them a fair opportunity in education. Not to single out those of low-income homes, race, or learning disabilities. It should be the goal to get to the heart of misbehavior that is introducing so many students into the juvenile justice system. School institutions need to be place of supportive and structured learning from day one. Students enter school as young children, for the first time away from parents, relying on educators to guide them throughout their day. School Institutions should look for a positive approach that emphasizes on individual strengths to promote learning. The restorative circles program is having been introduced into school systems as an alternative to the zero tolerance policies. It creates an involvement of communication between all parties in any issue. Whether it be good or bad, it offers support for students to discuss issues and ideas, opening a line of communication between parents, teachers, and students, which will be key a student’s
McCulloch, Lisa. "The California Child Abuse & Neglect Reporting Http://www.dominican.edu. Rady Children's Hospital, n.d. Web. 17 Apr. 2014.
Kafka, Judith. 2011. The history of "zero tolerance" in American public schooling. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9781137001962.
The zero tolerance policy has become a national controversy in regards to the solid proven facts that it criminalizes children and seems to catch kids who have no intention of doing harm. Although, there has been substantial evidence to prove that the policies enforced in many schools have gone far beyond the extreme to convict children of their wrongdoing. The punishments for the act of misconduct have reached a devastating high, and have pointed students in the wrong direction. Despite the opinions of administrators and parents, as well as evidence that zero tolerance policies have deterred violence in many public and private schools, the rules of conviction and punishment are unreasonable and should be modified.
LaMorte, Michael. School Law: Cases and Concepts. 4th ed. London: Allyn and Bacon, 1993. Lane, Kenneth, Mary Jane Connelly, Julie Mead, Mark Gooden, and Suzanne Eckes, eds.
Another major reason why juveniles are ending up in the juvenile justice system is because many schools have incorporate the zero tolerance policy and other extreme school disciplinary rules. In response to violent incidents in schools, such as the Columbine High School massacre, school disciplinary policies have become increasingly grave. These policies have been enacted at the school, district and state levels with the hopes of ensuring the safety of students and educators. These policies all rely on the zero tolerance policy. While it is understandable that protecting children and teachers is a priority, it is not clear that these strict policies are succeeding in improving the safety in schools.
Schools inevitably must deal with disciplinary action when it comes to misconduct in students. However, at what point should the courts and law enforcement intervene? “Zero tolerance” policies started as a trend in the school setting during the 1990s in “response to the widespread perception that juvenile violence was increasing and school officials needed to take desperate measures to address the problem” (Aull 2012:182-183). However, national statistics indicated a decrease in juvenile’s share of crime during the influx of zero tolerance policies in schools (National Crime Justice Reference Service 2005).
Fischer, L., Schimmel, D., & Stellman, L. (2007). Teachers and the law (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
This injustice is commonly referred to as the school-to- prison pipeline. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, “zero tolerance” policies in schools criminalize minor violations of school rules, resulting in resource officers placed in schools lead students to be criminalized for situations that should be handled within the school. Moreover, students of color are three times more likely to be severely punished for their behavior than white students. This discrimination follows the student into young adulthood where they are more likely to be incarcerated. This continuous cycle of entering the prison system and then continuously going in and out of it was discussed in the documentary. Possible solutions that have been discussed to end the school-to-prison pipeline include: police being the last resort in fixing conflict, improving the student to staff ratio, and providing more alternative discipline practices. Recently, more schools are noticing the damaging effects related to taking students out of class for disciplinary reasons and have since came up with alternatives to suspension such as restorative justice, which allows students to resolve conflict through conversations that may include the student, the person the student hurt and their
Sides: Clashing Views on Educational Issues. 14th ed. Ed. Dennis L. Evans. Dubuque: McGraw-Hill Contemporary Learning Series, 2008. Print.
Zulling Keith J; Koopman,Tommy M and Patton, Jon M. School climate:Historical Rview,instrument development and school assessment,Journal of psychoeducational assessment,28(2) 139-152,2010,sage publication.
While this definition is greatly more accepted around the world, it leaves many researchers wanting more clarification. If the same person repeats similar negative actions, one time, to multiple people; is it bullying? If one person receives a negative action, one time, from someone who has done this to other students; are these people being bullied? For the schools that are implementing zero tolerance policies for bullying, when do the teachers and administrators act on such inappropriate behaviors? “The problem with the repeated occurrence requirement is that the waiting period heightens the negative effects on the victim, allows the bully to feel rewarded, increases fear in onlookers, and makes intervention a more lengthy process” (Ballard, R 1999 p. 41). Acknowledging negative behaviors and language in the classrooms and/or the hallways is needed by the staff and the students. When pointing out an action that was demonstrated once can help in preventing the risks of