Why Did The Rose Theater Decline

1404 Words3 Pages

The Rose Theatre was a home for theatre troupes for only about 20 years, then the theatre was pulled down. It seems silly to think that Philip Henslowe would build such a structure with his own money, just to have it used for such a short amount of time. However, different factors lead into the downfall of the theatre that was situated on Bankside, Southwark in London, including the Bubonic Plague, increasing rent of buildings, and competition from other theatres in the area. In order to talk about the issues that contributed to the eventual tearing down of the Rose, it is important to note how it initially got started. It was the fourth public theatre to be built, but the first on Bankside (Severdia). Philip Henslowe was leased the land, called “Little Rose”, in 1585 and the actual theatre was built by carpenter John Griggs in 1587 (Adams). Records show that the actual theatre was small, polygonal-like structure with 14 sides (“The History”). A lot of the knowledge of how the Rose looked was from the two-thirds of the theatre’s ground plan that was discovered by archeologists …show more content…

Henslowe put his own money into this playhouse, just to have it be torn down around 20 years later. It’s hard to imagine a theatre being pulled down in today’s era because of how unsuccessful it was, but the Rose hit a string of bad luck. It all started with the outbreak of plague that hit, however, even if that had not happened at all, the Rose probably would have still been torn down. This is due to the fact that the theatre had popularity even with the outbreak of plague and with any sort of popularity comes people who want to compete with that. The other theatres would have still popped up on Bankside to challenge the Rose and it would have spiraled from there. The plague just happened to be a catalyst in the events that occurred

Open Document