Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the media in war
The role of the media in war
How did the nazis use propaganda during ww2 to influence people
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of the media in war
Who Carried Out Krystallnaught
Source Based
Sources A and B
Source A is the summary of an historian's account what was originally
written by a journalist who worked for the Nazis. The account is of a
social party for the top Nazi leaders on the 9th November. Source B is
from a secret document by the Nazis Supreme Court after
Krystallnaught. Source A is blaming Krystallnaught on the Nazis, the
original account was written by Frits Hesse who worked for the Nazis
as a journalist, so it may be biased. Source B seems to be sympathetic
to Goebbles, and as it is written by the Nazis I think it may be very
biased and untrustworthy. I think source A is the most useful because
it is against the Nazis, and it was originally written by a Nazi who
would usually put a good name in for the Nazi Government. Source B on
the other hand is written by the Nazi's and is in their favour, as it
was written by the Nazi Supreme Court.
Source C gives the impression that Krystallnaught was planned by the
Nazis with the SS men dressed as civilians carrying out the attacks.
Also we can see that all the local crowds were 'horrified' by the acts
of the Nazis, so the source says it couldn't have been the civilians
who carried out these attacks. The Source also shows the Nazi press,
trying to cover up the attack they may have arranged, by saying it was
a 'spontaneous wave of anger'. Another fact showing that the Nazi's
may have planned Krystallnaught was that many Jews that night were
taken to concentration camps, and there is no way the civilians would
have been able to arrange this, only Nazi soldiers could have sent
these Jews to the concentration camps.
In Source F we have a fat Nazi standing over a dead corpse of a Jew,
the Nazi has watches and loot in his pockets and is holding a bloody
knife in one hand and a club in the other.
The tone and mood of this story is pretty dark when it comes to the main event in the assembly when Georg’s dad and other innocent people were killed. I personally think the main purpose of this book is to teach the reader how not only Jews were affected horribly during this time but many other innocent people and also to show the things these people would of done to be safe, for example, in the book Georg had to stay still in a suit case for a whole night so he could get on a train that is leaving the country, during that time he was not being allowed to move he would be in pain but he cannot make a sound either since he could get caught so he just had to me cramped in a suit case for hours in pain unable to speak. I personally feel like this part truly in depth showed what people went through just to be
The Book Thief and The Devil’s Arithmetic both focus on the prejudice Hitler had on different types of people during World War II. Liesel and Hannah both lost someone they had dearly loved. Liesel lost Rudy and Hannah lost many members of her family. In a time of fearfulness, both had told stories to the people surrounding them. Although both were not seen as equal in the eyes of many during their time, I see them as courageous and brave heroes after what they underwent.
In the years between 1933 and 1945, Germany was engulfed by the rise of a powerful new regime and the eventual spoils of war. During this period, Hitler's quest for racial purification turned Germany not only at odds with itself, but with the rest of the world. Photography as an art and as a business became a regulated and potent force in the fight for Aryan domination, Nazi influence, and anti-Semitism. Whether such images were used to promote Nazi ideology, document the Holocaust, or scare Germany's citizens into accepting their own changing country, the effect of this photography provides enormous insight into the true stories and lives of the people most affected by Hitler's racism. In fact, this photography has become so widespread in our understanding and teaching of the Holocaust that often other factors involved in the Nazi's racial policy have been undervalued in our history textbooks-especially the attempt by Nazi Germany to establish the Nordic Aryans as a master race through the Lebensborn experiment, a breeding and adoption program designed to eliminate racial imperfections.
Kershaw later depicts a comment made by Hitler discussing the dire need to deport German Jews, away from the ‘Procterate,’ calling them “dangerous ‘fifth columnists’” that threatened the integrity of Germany. In 1941, Hitler discusses, more fervently his anger towards the Jews, claiming them to responsible for the deaths caused by the First World War: “this criminal race has the two million dead of the World War on its conscience…don’t anyone tell me we can’t send them into the marshes (Morast)!” (Kershaw 30). These recorded comments illustrate the deep rooted hatred and resentment Hitler held for the Jewish population that proved ultimately dangerous. Though these anti-Semitic remarks and beliefs existed among the entirety of the Nazi Political party, it didn’t become a nationwide prejudice until Hitler established such ideologies through the use of oral performance and
"It was illegal to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany. Even so, I am
the source. So I can now say that source B would be the more reliable
According to Welch, “The public’s reaction to anti-Semitic films reveals that propaganda had considerable success in persuading the population that a Jewish ‘problem’ existed, but equally that there was a limit to their tolerance of the type of virulently anti-Semitic propaganda to be found in films like Der Ewige Jude and publications like Der Stuermer.” Even after years of Nazi propaganda, even Goebbels wasn’t convinced that “such propaganda had persuaded Germans to condone open violence against
Although this book uses offensive words, it is such an important part of this time period. Some adults may not want their kids reading these stories in school because they can repeat the words and use them offensively. People could also feel that this book isn’t appropriate because it was written so long ago and uses old-fashioned phrases that don't teach students proper English. People will always have their own opinions.
“Der exige Jude”: Quellenkritische Analyse eines antisemititschen Propagandaf ilms, Institute Fur Wissenschaftlichen Film, Gottingen, 1995,p.134
• In 1933, there were 4.700 regional newspapers, but only 2.4 per cent of them supported the Nazi Party. By 1944 there were fewer than 1,000 regional newspapers and 82 per cent of them swore ‘total allegiance’ to the Nazi Party, with the remainder ‘loyal’ to the regime. (McDonough 50)
The book, Your Loyal and Loving Son, is a compilation of letters home written by Karl Fuchs, a young German male sharing his experiences, feelings and emotions from 1937, when he comes of age for the Labor Service until his premature death on the Eastern Front in 1941. Even though many contend that serving in the German military during WWII inevitably classifies an individual as evil, Karl Fuchs, a young man who grew up in Germany during the Nazi Party 's escalation of power ought not be generalized into the taxonomy of 'immoral Nazi ' for the underlying principle, his only true offenses of patriotism, a sense of nationalism and honor developed as a result of exposure to the Nazi faction 's propaganda machine.
Nazis versus Jews: Predator versus pray; Jews are less than human to the Nazis during this time period and so they are depicted as mice, while the Germans are cats. The Nazi propaganda of this time portrayed the Jews as vermin and unworthy of being treated equally. Shows and animated films of this era were flourishing with racial caricatures and with this, all of the different ethnicities were portrayed to the audience as different animals that were “suiting for their kind”. The different animal figures is not to show that Jews are good and the Germans are bad; it is to show that race and ethnicity is not reducible to one specific characteristic or another. Some Jews are good, some are bad; some Poles are good, some are bad; some Germans are good, some are bad. Even though Jews should be Jews and Poles should be Poles that did not always occur. Jews and their councils complied with their occupiers, some Jews tricked...
This is an example of the treatment of Jews at the time. It is very
the book the author discusses her main views toward the actions of the Nazis and
It is a book that my child may never be able to read. It seems that the only logical reasoning to aid in what offends people is to completely eliminate the book from the library. A better approach is to understand that this book may help them examine other beliefs, attitudes, values, and traditions and to accept, tolerate, or even reject these ideas without prejudices against people who hold particular views. In the democracy In which we live, where regularly all ideas are debatable. A wide range on all points of view should be available to the public.