How Does Dickens Portray The Unions With As Much Sympathy As The Workers?

1996 Words4 Pages

What is Dickens Attitude to the Working Classes in Chapter XX (Book 2, Chapter 4)?Does Dickens portray the Unions with as much Sympathy as the Workers? Charles Dickens wrote Hard Times in 1854. What is Dickens Attitude to the Working Classes in Chapter XX (Book 2, Chapter 4)? Does Dickens portray the Unions with as much Sympathy as the Workers? Charles Dickens wrote Hard Times in 1854. He lived in London and because he was writing about industrialisation in the North at that time he went up to Preston in 1852 to explore the industrialisation there and to witness the strike of the weavers. He was horrified by the oppressing industrialists he witnessed and also horrified by seeing the way the common people were made to work. …show more content…

Whereas Dickens’ portrayal of Stephen is completely different. Stephen is portrayed as the hero in this chapter and almost characterizes Dickens own personal thoughts to the problem at the time. Stephen is telling the crowd in the chapter that going on strike is not the answer. When he starts speaking, we lapse into Coketown dialect which is almost uncomprensible which puts Stephen lower than the rest of the workers but shows him as a man of the Earth type; this draws a line of complete difference between the characters of Slackbridge and Stephen again, because although Slackbridge has a lot to say and says it with noise and enthusiasm, Stephen speaks with the same tone and is portrayed as quiet and Jesus-like, good. Before Stephen speaks, the crowd sympathises towards him, in respect to what he has to say, ‘then the place was wonderfully still.’ Again an almost Christ-like image. In one part of Stephen’s speech, he uses a biblical reference towards the Good Samaritan, he being the Jew in the road and the crowd, the people choosing to walk past. The reader is drawn to feel sorry for Stephen and we see him as an outsider. For all this, the gulf between the portrait of the Preston …show more content…

Dickens had also seen what had happened when the workers did eventually revolt as 1848 was the Year of Revolutions; France, Germany and Russia had all revolted and we see that from the Chapter XX of Hard Times Dickens was definitely against the English workers forming a revolution too. It seems probable that Dickens’s life-long distrust of political association and his early experience as a reporter in the House of Commons are partially responsible for his attitude to trade unions aswell. So although the tone of this chapter is revolutionary, it actually fails to be revolutionary. Hard Times was one of Dickens weakest novels as he didn’t follow through his points and the most obvious question that he left unanswered and ambiguous is his solution to the industrial

Open Document