What Happened To George Mead's Theory?

603 Words2 Pages

telling this information to becomes either excited or sad, they might also become excited or sad and that is when the gestures that they are using becomes significant. A strength that Mead had about his theory is his thoughts about human actions. “Humans act – they don't react. As Mead characterizes it, the distinctly human act contains four distinct elements: impulse, perception, manipulation, and consumption” (Allan 2014:160). This is a strength, because it defines what people will do when they perceive that something is going to happen to them. Humans act to protect themselves, an example of this is where a criminal will be trying to hurt another person and that person will act to get away from the criminal. In my honest opinion, I do not believe that Mead has a weakness in his theory. George Mead has contributed to the discipline of sociology, by going into more detail about what humans will do and what society needs. The last theorist that I found interesting in this course was Lewis Coser. I found him interesting, because he made some great contributions to conflict theory. One of the ideas that I found interesting was Coser's idea about relative deprivation. “Relative deprivation, however, refers to a sense of being underprivileged relative to some other person or group” (Allan 2014:261). An example of this is at a place of work, one person might be not getting the raises that others are and they feel as if they are losing out …show more content…

I have learned a lot from being in this class and throughly enjoyed the learning experience. This analysis was the perfect way to show what I have learned from taking this course. Even though the class only once a week for not a large amount of time, there was still a lot of information that was gone over. Overall, the main thing that I gained from taking sociological theory is that even though there are many different theories, they all work together in one way or another to make society

Open Document