What Are The Arguments In The Crucible

469 Words1 Page

Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible as a criticism of the communist witch hunt spearheaded by Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s. Miller believed that the investigations conducted by the House Un-American Activities Committee had as little basis as the Salem Witchcraft Trials. Although Congress was not accusing anyone of being a witch, the intentions of Senator McCarthy and the church who supported the trials in Salem are the same: retention of power. McCarthy intended to create a climate of fear that would ensure his power and the power of his supporters in the government. In Salem, Reverend Parris was so eager to believe Abigail's cries of sorcery because if he did not, he would be thrown from the pulpit after the truth got out that Abigail attempted to summon spirits to kill …show more content…

For example, the debate on illegal immigration all too often is boiled down to two sides: build a wall, and legalize everyone. Do we really believe that these positions truly represent the thoughts of the majority of Americans? As this issue has become more sensationalized, we hear more of the claim, and less of the qualification. Many people join one of the extremes because they see no other option, thus power is retained in these radical ideas. Society has been unable to shake this sensationalization because of the hysteria that surrounds dissenting opinions. Those who want to secure the border are labeled facist xenophobes and those who want amnesty are labeled communist snowflakes. These labels are rarely accurate are only spread distrust and division. This hysteria was also present in Salem. Reverend Parris saw any doubt that there were witches in Salem as an attempt to undermine the court. Those who distrusted the court were often accused of being witches themselves because “good Christians should not fear the court.” The narrative present in Salem and today is “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the

Open Document