Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and importance of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Advantages and importance of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Advantages and importance of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to the FindLaw website Arbitration is defined as: “Arbitration is one of various methods that together are referred to as alternative dispute resolution or ADR. As suggested by the name, the idea behind methods of ADR is to provide an alternative to filing a lawsuit and going to court, which is the traditional method for resolving legal disputes. Arbitration and similar alternatives were primarily designed to provide for a streamlined and cost-conscious option to deal with a legal issue”. (www.findlaw.com) Where according to the business dictionary, litigation is define as: “Ultimate legal method for settling controversies or disputes between and among persons, organizations, and the State. In litigation process, a case (called suit or lawsuit) is brought before a court of law suitably empowered (having the jurisdiction) to hear the case, by the parties involved (the litigants) for resolution (the judgment)”. (www.businessdictionary.com)
Arbitration over litigation is generally the choice venue to settle a dispute in the business world. Several reasons for this consensus are that arbitration can be quicker, less expensive, confidential and final (no appeals). According to Reed, Shedd, Pagnattaro, Morehead “The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved an arrangement whereby investors with complaints against securities must submit them for arbitration to arbitrators assigned by the various stock exchanges and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority”. ( 131,132) After reviewing this week’s case study, our text show three possible scenarios of what the Judge could do, at this time I would like to address each one.
In the first scenario, the judge could allow the arbitration to proceed, although there ...
... middle of paper ...
...ing with millions of other peoples monies. Both the company Securities America and Stock Broker Ron Carazo violated good faith business practice and both should pay for their wrongdoing.
In closing, if I were the judge, I would definitely let the arbitration proceed and suggest that a civil suit be file against Mr. Carazo.
References Cited: http://adr.findlaw.com/arbitration/what-is-arbitration-.html#sthash.fW6sypcA.dpufis a process retrieved 5-25-2014 http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/litigation.html#ixzz32mOD8sTl retrieved 5-25-14
Reed, O.L., Shedd, P.J., Pagnattaro, M.A., Morehead, J.W. (2010). The Legal and Regulatory Environment of Business. pp132-133. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin 15th edition http://resources.lawinfo.com/civil-litigation/civil-procedure/class-action/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-class-act.html retrieved 5-25-14
Beatty, Jeffrey F., Susan S. Samuelson, and Jeffrey F. Beatty. Business Law and the Legal Environment. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western/West, 2004. Print.
A glaring question raised from the inspection of institutional rules on arbitration is whether privacy and confidentiality are different or not. To answer this very question, a crucial distinction should be made between both the terms. They have been presumed to be the core principles of any arbitral proceedings; this does not mean these two different concepts are implied to be one and the same thing. In fact they are corollaries to each other, since the reason of privacy is the concern for confidentiality. Privacy will be meaningless without confidentiality. Various scholars have made quite a number of distinctions as to what is exactly the concept of privacy and confidentiality.
Arbitration is an alternative to litigation between two parties in dispute. This method of dispute resolution is used by opposing parties outside a court of law. In Arbitration, both parties agree to a neutral panel, called an arbitration, who hears their dispute and decide the outcome. Arbitration uses an adversarial system much like litigation and offers a binding decision from the partly of their choice. Organizations in a Collective Agreement benefit by using arbitration instead of litigation because of the greater degree of control it give the parties, the ability for the parties appoint their own arbiter(s) and is generally a cost-effective approach compared to litigation.
Sue contracts with Tom to deliver a quantity of computers to Sue’s Computer Store. They disagree over the amount, the delivery date, the price, and the quality. Sue files a suit against Tom in a state court. Their state requires that their dispute be submitted to mediation or nonbinding arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved, or if either party disagrees with the decision of the mediator or arbitrator, will a court hear the case? Explain. (See Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
Mallor, J. P., Barnes, A., Bowers, T., & Langvardt, A. W. (2010). Business Law: The Ethical, Global, and E-Commerce Environment (14th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chesseman, Henry R. Legal Environment of Business: Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and Global Issues. 8th ed. N.p.: Pearson Education, Inc. , 2016. Print.
The construction site was in a downtown area of a large southeastern city, criss-crossed with city streets, utilities, and immediately adjacent to mid-rise and high rise buildings. Nearly all of the work was required to be constructed within temporary piling structures to limit settlement of adjacent structures. The construction contract called for seven phase releases of work areas and nine completion milestones, each milestone has its own liquidated damages penalty. The construction contract was valued at $10 million, and the duration was 545 calendar days. Following the completion of the work, the contractor filed a claim for $5.5 million and 1.1 million in interest. The authority subsequently denied the claim and the contractor, in accordance with the contract, filed an arbitration demand with the American Arbitration Association. Following the contractor’s issuance of the demand letter, the parties agreed to resolve the dispute through negotiation” (Ray,
Foote, Susan B. 1984. ¡§Corporate responsibility in a changing legal environment¡¨. California Management Review. Spring. V.26, p. 217-228.
Without Boeskey’s help, catching other insider-trading criminals would have been almost impossible. Ivan Boesky even wrote a book about his involvement in the world of insider trading; he called it Merger Mania. This case illustrates that there are real consequences to white collar crime. In addition to paying the fifty million dollar fine, he relinquished another fifty million dollars of his illegal trading profits. He still had millions remaining, however, from his illegal gains.
O'Connor, James V. "Business Edge, Volume 2, No. 21." Business Edge, Volume 2, No. 21. The Business Edge, Apr. 2000. Web. 11 Feb. 2014. .
Although ADR is an appealing alternative to litigation today, throughout the early history of the United States, courts expressed much hostility toward the idea of enforcing an agreement through any alternative dispute resolution. Throughout the 1900’s, United States courts were reluctant to enforce any agreement to arbitrate an existing or future dispute unless a specific statute...
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions to disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is more of an official adjudicative and adversary technique initially a confidential litigation process which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11). "The key difference between ADR and those traditional techniques of litigation and arbitration is that ADR techniques are used to produce a resolution to dispute through a negotiated agreement while litigation and arbitration are processes by which a result is imposed on the parties. " We can say that many issues arise with terms.
... with the aggrieved worker and representative meeting with the supervisor involved, followed by an appeal system with strict time limits and ultimately ending in binding arbitration. When management and the union cannot resolve a grievance submitted by a union, the union must decide whether to proceed to the final step of the grievance procedure: arbitration. Arbitration is an adversary proceeding like a trial in court. An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy.
In the world of commerce, employment, and other social relations, businesses and individuals strive to choose either arbitration or mediation (conciliation). There are situations when parties submit their cases to arbitration bodies for mediation and, vice versa, when mediators are requested to resolve the dispute through the arbitration award. The arbitration and mediation traditions vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but their general ideas still remain similar. However, while a mediator in a single process possesses no entitled authority to render an award, an arbitrator is vested with more procedural powers and can execute a mediator’s functions. Furthermore, despite the flexibility of arbitration and mediation procedures, as well