Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justification of atomic bomb use
Nuclear disaster in hiroshima and nagasaki during second world war essay
United states role in wwii
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justification of atomic bomb use
Deciding to Drop the Bomb Was the dropping of the atomic bomb justified? Victory by the Allied troops in Europe was already achieved prior to the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by President Harry.S Truman. In fact, that year on May 8th, Germany had already surrendered and Hitler had committed suicide just a month before this victory due to the British, American and Soviet troops engulfing both sides of berlin. Despite this, Japan had refused to surrender and were adamant on fighting the war. Moreover, the total US casualties amassed to large 320,000 during this stage in the war. As a result, Truman felt it was imperative to end the war as soon as possible without any further US casualties.Moreover, the fact that Truman was newly elected, he faced …show more content…
Specifically, for the bombing Pearl Harbor and cruelty towards prisoners of war from the US.). Prior to Pearl Harbor US were nonviolent in their approach Japan only employing trade sanction as well as demanding they withdrew from China.(Shepard, Colin 199) .However, Japan could not be reasoned with and dropped a bomb on the US killing 3200 of her people. Secondly, during the war Japan broke the Geneva convention by committing crimes against humanity. Specifically, 4 out every 10 US’s POW’s died out of starvation, illness and or abuse and 40% of all 27,000 prisoners died in captivity. Such was the degradement of US soldiers by the cruelty of the Japanese using ghastly torture methods . Additionally, POW’s were used for experimented on dissected upon (e.g: lungs of two us soldiers) were removed for vivisection studies by the Japanese. This is a clear example of how Japan treated US soldiers worse than animals. This is why Truman had adopted an eye for eye belief system a clear example of this is his quote is “When you have to deal with a beast you have to treat him as a beast.”. This hate was in direct response towards Japan’s attack on pearl harbor and their malpractices and Truman felt the atomic bombs deployed would treat Japan as the beast he sought it to be. Another quote that exemplies this is “We have used it against those who attacked us without warning at Pearl Harbor, against those who have starved and beaten and …show more content…
Truman decided to use the bomb because it was more costeffective dollar wise and did not cost soldier’s lives. Thus, being more efficient than sending more troops and dragging the war. Moreover, it saved Japanese lives because if the conflict had continued Japanse deaths would come to tens of millions according to predictions by the allies. As a result, Truman realised it would save more lives on both sides rather than going an onslaught of aerial raids. Truman not only used the bomb for its efficiency he did so because it displayed the power of the US to USSR . Truman was anticommunist and feared the spread of communism and he used the bomb to scare the USSR .The usage of the bombs showed the Soviets the US was a more powerful nation as well as more technologically advanced . The usage of the atomic bomb also negated the Soviet union’s involvement by ending the war as they promised to invade Japan in august of 1945 but this never came into fruition due to the
The way Truman took had some advantages. One advantage was that the atomic bomb could help the united states win against the Japanese, which The Russian premier in, President Truman's Version, also agreed and said “that he was glad to hear it and hoped he would
According to document A, President Truman believed that it was his duty to protect and save American lives And that's exactly what he did. If we did not go through with the atomic bomb, then we would have had to get Japan to surrender another way, yeah we could have put up an economic blockade and continuously bombed them like Admiral William Leahy wanted to do in in document A. Or we could have invaded and lost many more lives in the process, the war would have dragged on costing more American lives and more money for the United States.
The quicker the war ended, the less casualties Americans would suffer. Second, he sought to justify the money and effort that was put into the Manhattan Project. If he did not use the bomb, people would blame him for the lives lost towards the end of the war because he withheld such a powerful weapon. Third, using the bomb would impress the Soviets, make them more subordinate to American desires, and improve overall relations with them. Fourth, Truman realized he lacked reasons to avoid using the bomb. In the military, diplomatic, and political sense, the bomb was the best route. Morality would be the only issue, but these were not a major preventive. Lastly, Truman claimed the Japanese were like a beast and the only way to deal with them was to treat them like a beast. After the attacks on Pearl Harbor, hatred had been built up against the Japanese. This hate diminished any hesitation Truman may have experienced in his decision to drop the
On August 6, 1945, the U.S. dropped the world’s first atomic bomb over Hiroshima. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. On August 15th, the Japan announced unconditional surrender in World War II. To this day historians still discuss why the U.S. decided to use the atomic bombs. Orthodox historians argue that the decision to drop the bombs was a military one designed purely to defeat the Japanese.
Should We Have Dropped the Atomic Bomb? The atomic bomb killed many innocent people, but it was necessary to end World War II. After World War II began in 1939, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt announced the neutrality of the United States. Many people in the United States think that their country should stay out of the war. The people wanted the Allied Forces to have the victory.
There are many opinions surrounding the question: Was the decision by Truman to drop the atomic bomb ultimately the right or wrong decision? Not only can this question be answered in many different ways, it can be interpreted in many different ways as well. Overall, Truman ultimately made the right decision to drop the atomic bomb. This can be supported by the fact that the atomic bomb helped prevent the deaths of American troops, saved the lives of foreign citizens, and in comparison the atomic bomb was not as destructive as the firebombing in Tokyo.
President Harry Truman, 33rd president of the United States, had to face one of the most effective decisions of mankind. The atomic bomb was first served as an idea created by the United States government. With a nuclear weapon like the atomic bomb, comes great responsibility. The idea of how to use and regulate the bomb was not yet implemented. Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb changed the way Americans thought about war because of its traumatic after effects.
A huge proponent to the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9 of 1945 was President Harry Truman. Although they value the ideas and contributions out in by the committee they choose, the president ultimately has the last say on war time decisions. It just so happens that President Truman wanted to drop the bomb. President Truman believed that Japan's leaders would not surrender to the terms outlined in Potsdam meeting. He saw it fit to drop the bombs and end all doubt.
In addition to the prevention of communism, President Truman’s decision was also influenced by the apprehensive environment during the Cold War. The Soviet Union was able to ruin the United States as the monopoly of nuclear bombs in 1949 when they successfully detonated their first atomic bomb (“The Cold War Museum”).... ... middle of paper ... ...
Some of these are the bombings that killed innocent Japanese civilians who did not deserve it, the Japanese were about to surrender before we bombed them, and the United States only blasted the Japanese because of racism toward them. Though there are many valid reasons for and against the bombing, there is still much controversy today about whether President Truman made the right decision.
When President Truman authorized the use of two nuclear weapons in 1945 against the Japanese in the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II, the nature of international security was changed irreversibly. At that time, the United States had what was said to have a monopoly of atomic bombs. Soon thereafter, the Soviet Union began working on atomic weaponry. In 1949, it had already detonated it first atomic bomb and tensions began to heat up between the two countries. With the information that the Soviets had tested their first bomb, the United States began work on more powerful weapons1, and a fight for nuclear superiority had begun.
The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan were ethical decisions made by President Harry Truman and the United States government. By the time of the atom bomb was ready, the U.S. had been engaged in military conflict for over four years and lost over 400,000 soldiers. Truman claimed, "We would have the opportunity to bring the world into a pattern in which the peace of the world and our civilization can be saved" (Winkler 18). The bomb was aimed at ending the war immediately and avoiding prolonged battle in the Pacific Theater and the inevitable invasion of Japan. President Truman hoped that by showing the Japanese the devastating weapon the U.S. possessed, that the war could be brought ...
Truman had thought through the possibilities and had decided that using the bomb would be the most effective and quickest tactic. As a president Truman had a responsibility to protect his country, citizens, and foreign affairs, so deciding on the best method to establish everybody’s needs was difficult. There were many things to worry about: fighting on Iwo Jima and Okinawa, bombing Japan, and building the bomb. His decision was mainly based on how the US citizens felt and the following actions of japan. Japan refused to accept an unconditional surrender, which was demanded by the allied powers in order to stop the war against them. On August 6, 1945 Truman allowed Enola Gay to drop the atomic bomb on top of Hiroshima and later Nagasaki to end the war.
Upon reading “Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan” by J. Samuel Walker, a reader will have a clear understanding of both sides of the controversy surrounding Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. The controversy remains of whether or not atomic bombs should have been used during the war. After studying this text, it is clear that the first atomic bomb, which was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, was a necessary military tactic on ending the war. The second bomb, which was dropped on Nagasaki, however, was an unnecessary measure in ensuring a surrender from the Japanese, and was only used to seek revenge.
On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This was an extremely controversial military strategy in the United States. Was the United States justified in the dropping of the atomic bomb? The U.S. feared the rise of communism and gave aid to any country against it. The U.S. also fought countries threatening the spread communism. One of these countries was Japan. We began a harsh and brutal war against Japan and against communism. This war was killing many soldiers and Japan was not backing down. President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb when things were getting worse. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a difficult one and many people wonder if it was the right choice.