WPA in Guyana

929 Words2 Pages

What the WPA, and the preceding actions of its constituents along with other sectors in Guyana, accomplished, was the visible representation of multi-racialism in its, rank and file, the importance, in the Guyana’s context of prominent black leaders opposing mainly black regime and the engagement of sections of the Indian indo-Guyanese shifting towards was at least at the non-electoral level. note that none of this multi-racial enthusiasm was tested at the ballot box, which in 1974was far from the radar of the WPA.

But how far did the new politics reach? How was it possible to fight for a democratic society amidst all the confusion of the outside world, where the Soviet Union and its allies, although supportive of liberation movements around the world, did not endorse the local struggles for democracy; and played realpolitk with small countries? The Guyanese state had also by that time, with its critical role in the non-aligned movement, its anti-apartheid stand, and increasing ties with socialist countries benefited from the that most of the allies of the opposition Marxist-Leninist PPP welcomed Guyana’s support as a state. While the PPP was caught in this quagmire the WPA managed to avoid some of the pitfalls of this conundrum that pitted democracy against socialism. It achieved this by its concentration on local issues, its vigorous defence of democratic struggle and its programmatic-ideological positions which fused Marxism with democratic ideals, what is commonly deemed the ‘new left.’

Perhaps this contradiction led an alert Guyanesese middle-class lawyer to ask a provocative question at the height of the PNC's repression of the WPA and the PPP, in a context where all three contenders were self-identified Lefti...

... middle of paper ...

...uding the pressure group WPA at that time established a definite attentiveness to the urgent overthrow of the state and social revolution, but there was little active consideration of women’s rights inside and outside the organization.

When press releases and handbills emerged that spoke to gender equality while obviously meant well, they were in an overall sense, ‘cliches’ of parties of the type and there was on offer no fundamental, revolutionary change to the issue of gender and/or women’s rights. This neglect would re-merge later to haunt the now, for all practical purposes, defunct WPA.

In the party structures women were not very well represented numerically and there was little discussion of gender equality except for a general ‘wordy’ way in the occasional press release and in Dayclean. Fundamental female concerns were not addressed in holistic ways.

Open Document