Visual Vs Decooding

736 Words2 Pages

The host of the radio station KUT and KUTX, Rebecca Mcinroy, quoted in one of her shows, “So, read, listen, watch, touch… it’s all working your brain in different and wonderful ways”(Mcinroy). When it comes to reading a book, there is said to be no right or wrong answer. It can take someone 3 years to finish a book as much as it takes someone 1 week, yet the book is still read, and the deed is accomplished. Yet while visual reading is applied more in a daily routine, auditorily reading has, and continues to, become wildly popular. There are many benefits to both, and of course people will voice their opinions, but the main question still lingers in the air: Which is better, auditorily or visually reading? I personally believe this argument is essential for reading. It has become a controversial topic for people of all ages, provoking them to argue over the beliefs and disbeliefs. If humans step back and attempt to comprehend both sides, they …show more content…

Decoding is the process in which the brain translates the strings of letters into meaningful sentences. Language Processing is the comprehension of everything that occurs in the novel. By the late years in elementary, decoding becomes a part of a person, so the brain does not have to do any additional work while reading a book(Science of Us). Growing up, reading a physical copy of a book becomes an easier task. Willingham states, “Some people enjoy curling up physically with a book” (Willingham). There is not a straightforward way to express the emotions and physical pleasure that comes when a book is physically read. All the time of the world is in the reader's hand, allowing them to read and re read until they are fully content. Daniel Willingham claims that “About 10 to 20 percent of the eye movements you make are actually regressions, where your eyes are moving backwards” (Willingham).

Open Document