Veerle Provoost's Speech Analysis

627 Words2 Pages

Kids growing up who know their mother and father will never know the struggle that some kids go through that don’t. Some kids grow up never knowing who their real father is. Many parents face the decision on if they should tell their child that they have a sperm donor as a father (Provoost). Veerle Provoost interviewed many couples and children asking how they felt about the sperm donor and if they call him their child’s father or even if they have told their children who their real father is. Veerle Provoost tries to persuade the audience through her support, confidence and word choice that even though some families use sperm donation that doesn’t mean that their family is broken up or different. Provoost did a superb job during her speech on giving support on her research that she performed. …show more content…

She interviewed couples who received fertility treatment from Kent University Hospital (Provoost). She interviewed families with a father who did not have good quality sperm, lesbian couples and the children of those families. When interviewing the children she wanted to know how those children defined concept like parenthood and family (Provoost). She drew and apple tree to make them feel more comfortable. She starts off with an empty apple tree and she asked them to fill in the tree as if their family was apples. They would take a paper apple for every family member and put a name on it. She would then ask questions proving that most of the kids knew about their father and were thankful for them and put the donor on the trunk. This is because the donor formed the family and without him they would not be here. This is not the only thing that was a great part of her speech another one would be her

More about Veerle Provoost's Speech Analysis

Open Document