Understanding Online Sexual Harassment

3821 Words8 Pages

Communications has been in a process of evolution and revolution from the time the first cave person drew pictures on a wall through the inventions of the printing press, the telephone, radio, and television to the most current revolution – the Internet. This paper will attempt to briefly examine online sexual harassment and the constitutionally granted rights of the First Amendment. In the interests of brevity and to remain with in the parameters of the paper any discussion will exclude workplace sexual harassment, flaming and stalking. The issue of public versus private forum has been discussed in many papers and journals and will not be covered in this paper. We also assume that any reader of this paper has a basic knowledge of sexual harassment issues.

Any discussion of an area concerning the Internet must involve a fundamental understanding of its background and operations. The Internet began in the 1960’s as a method of preserving communications in the event of nuclear attack. It originally linked government and university computers. It was placed under the auspices of the Department of Defense’s Advanced Research Project Agency and was known as ARPANET. From 1969 to 1979, Dr. John Postel developed a procedure, based on the use of addresses that allowed ARPANET to connect to an other network, operated by the National Science Foundation. "…Addresses are long strings of numbers that facilitate the sending of information from one network computer to another…to assist in remembering the addresses Postel and his coworkers assigned each computer a name, which a file on each computer translated into numbers. " With the growth and popularity of the Internet modifications to this system were necessary. "[T]he ‘nicknames’ were sepa...

... middle of paper ...

...13 American University International Law Review (1998) 765-814. Online. Available from WestLaw database Journals and Law Reviews file: AMUILR

Reno v ACLU electronic Privacy Information Center Online. No. 96-511 Argued March

19, 1997 - Decided June 26, 1997 http//:www2.epic.org/cda/cda_decision.html

"Supreme Court Affirms a Portion of the Communications Decency Act," Cole Raywid & Braverman, LLP (1999) 1. Online http//www.crblaw.com/1999/04219901.htm

Apollomedia Corporation v Reno No. C-97-346 MMC Sept. 23, 1998 Cole, Raywind &

Braverman, LLP (1999) Online. http://www.cbrlaw.com/text/apollo.htm

Turner, William Bennett. "What Part of 'No Law' Don't You Understand?" Wired

(March 1996) 1-7. Online. http://www.wired.com/wired/4.03/no.law_pr.html

Jenna Wischmeyer, Jenna, "E-mail and the Workplace,"

http://raven.cc.ukans.edu/~cybermom/CLJ/wisch.html

Open Document