.
Exploring children’s understanding of historical time
Introduction
Chronology is a key skill required for the successful study of history and has been an important part of the primary history curriculum since 1995 (Hoodless, 2002). Yet in 2011 Her Majesty’s inspectors expressed concerns that many children fail to acquire an understanding of historical time. The Ofsted report (2011) stated that by the end of KS2 ‘many pupils ended up with an episodic knowledge of history and their sense of time was unclear’ (D of E, 2011). This prompted me to explore how children develop an understanding of historical time and to find out what teaching strategies could be used to improve the present situation.
A quick review of the literature showed it to be an area neglected by researchers. Only a small body of studies exist, some of which are outdated. This convinced me of the validity of this research project. These studies showed a wide disagreement in the development of children’s understanding of historical time. Is it a question of maturation? (Peel, 1965; Elton, 1970) or can it be developed by teaching? (Diem, 1982; Mur, 1985). A
…show more content…
It was argued that it was subject to maturation and did not develop until aged eleven. (Oaken and Stuart, 1922; Hallam and Peel, 1965; Elton, 1970). Heavily influenced by the work of Piaget (1946) and his four stages it was thought that time was a concept too abstract for a child at the pre-operational stage. It was only by the age of eleven that children developed the cognitive structures which would enable them to develop an understanding of historical time. This lead to the unfortunate conclusion that history was an unsuitable subject for primary aged children as ‘If children cannot understand how long situations last or sequence events than it was implied by academics that history would be meaningless’. (Cooper, 2000, pg.
In this essay I will outline the curricular systems for the 0-5 age group in England and Scotland. I will examine in detail the planning and assessment provisions of these systems which allow early years practitioners to gain insight into children's learning and to aid them in that regard. I will draw comparison between the practices of these two countries where possible, and provide criticism of each.
This generation is severely lacking cultural diversity. The United States school system feeds its students “American History,” but some believe it has only educated them on a few main points in history, and most of them have been from the view point of Euro-Centric America, and not the Melting Pot America is. There is so much to American history that even Americans are not aware of, however this generation is so consumed with celebrities, technological advancements, and up-to-date fashion. There is so much technology and access to the past, and yet most people do not take advantage of it. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to open those of this generation up to a culture rarely discussed unless in a detailed study specifically catered to it.
The most significant factor that a historical movie for children should have as opposed to
Early Years Matters (2012) outlines the following aspects of Understanding the world; exploration and investigation; the children investigate objects and materials, learning about changes and patterns whilst looking for similarities and differences. This improves their questioning of how and why things work. Design and making where children learn about the construction process and the tools and techniques used to assemble materials. ICT is used so that the children learn how to use appropriate technology such as computers and programmable toys that are supporting and enhancing their learning. Time is when children find out about events that have occurred in the past or present which are relevant to their own lives or those of their families. Place is when the children become aware of and show an interest in the natural world. Beginning to find out about their local area, knowing what they like and dislike about it. Finally, communities is about how children begin...
In the show, Arthur and Max and Ruby talked about the history and it shows that they are trying to teach their young audience about the past. In the episode Arthur takes a stand, they talk about Martin Luther King and John Lewis who was a civil right leader in the 1960s that fought for the equal rights of Black Americans. In the show, Max and Ruby talked about the ancient times and mentioned queen Cleopatra of Egypt. These two shows incorporate ancient and our history and it is a great way to introduce history to young children. Also, in the show Daniel Tiger’s Neighborhood their goal is to have children engage. Daniel Tiger tells the young audience to have an imagination and tells the audience what they have to do. For example, in the episode, he tells the audience that you need to press the three red buttons to open the door. In the show Dora The Explorer it is all about having the young audience engaged throughout the show. Dora asks questions to the audience to see if they see something and how to get to a certain
The Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) (DEEWR, 2009) identifies inquiry as central to effective early years learning. Teachers are able to provide opportunities for an inquiry-based approach to learning that can assist young children to explore their family through the history curriculum. Inquiry based learning is a comprehensive pedagogical approach to early years’ education. It is important for inquiry skills not to be taught in isolation, however they should be integrated into other subjects (Michalopoulou, 2014). Inquiry-based learning is deeply related to the EYLF, the history curriculum as well as creative and critical thinking. This essay will discuss inquiry based learning and how it can be positively incorporated into the history
exploring the ways in which I was taught as a child, examining what framework was used for
...ed that children's thinking does not develop entirely smoothly: instead, there are certain points at which it "takes off" and moves into completely new areas and capabilities. He saw these transitions as taking place at about 18 months, 7 years and 11 or 12 years. This has been taken to mean that before these ages children are not capable (no matter how bright) of understanding things in certain ways, and has been used as the basis for scheduling the school curriculum. Whether or not should be the case is a different matter”.
In most curricular areas the curriculum has become strict rules that need to be adhered to. The constructivist approach brings a new light to a child’s learning experience with the focus being on practical interactive learning. Children often experience this type on learning before they reach primary school. For example when a child encounters a jigsaw they are not just shown on a whiteboard how to finish the jigsaw, the child is guided by an instructor through hands on experience. The child learns techniques to then complete a jigsaw by themselves and will move on to complete more complicated jigsaws with time. Education should not be focused on day to day learning but more focused on life-long learning and experiences. Adopting the constructivist approach in the classroom especially through the subjects of history and geography is essential for children to reach their full learning potential.
Others have noted that we're all travelling forward in time (in fact, the theory relativity says that we are all travelling at the speed of light through spacetime) so I'll tackle the travelling-backward-in-time part of the question. And that breaks down into issues of whether backwards time travel is a theoretical possibility, and whether it's a practical one.
Nicholas, John, Soni, Avi. (2006). The Portal to Lean Production. Boca Raton, NY: Auerach Publications.
The act of time travel assumes that we can travel time at a rate different when compared to the normal world. There are several theories on how one could travel through time physically even if the methods wouldn’t make a lot of sense logically. These methods range from altered movement in regular space to the abuse of certain cosmic phenomena which may or may not exist. In this paper I will argue that the physical possibility of time travel is sound and therefore possible even if only theoretically.