Ucizka z kina “Wolnosc”(1990) is a fascinating movie that created a simple setting with an interesting plot. The movie centered on what would happen if people stopped following their scripted rolls and simply did what they wanted to, the best way to portray this idea was to use actors in a movie that have a script that they must follow and its always the same. Ucizka z kina “Wolnosc” Is a great example to what would happened if people stopped doing what they were told and did what they wanted to and how everyone around them would react. Ucizka z kina “Wolnosc” started off being very simple, just a typical middle aged man who was in a boring carrier that did not seem to mind who gave the impression of knowing what he was doing. Everything …show more content…
The idea that rich cotton mill owners would give up a decent amount of money for a seat at the council is very historically accurate. More events are tied directly to the movie but the most notable and one that’s worth the most attention giving is nearing the end. Once Piotr Fronczewski (Communist Party Secretary) tries to swamp out the movies at the cinema in order to get rid of the actors who refuse to play their rolls was one way that the communist regime in Poland tried to control the public. Once they were unsuccessful at replacing current order they tried the next best thing (in their opinion) which was to burn the movie. This is extremely important because it says what happens when a political party can’t control a small part of a society. This can be tied into the excommunication of people under the regime of communist Poland and all the protests that were suppressed by the military such as the workers
Some people that not account the story through the aspects of war and history may see this movie as a fiction movie due to its beliefs of people getting brainwashed or maybe a drama due to the ending. Others may see this movie as a threat to the president at that time, because one of the murder tentative was at one of the presidential candidates in the movie, which ended up to be a murder to the mother that was hypnotized her son and her elected husband. In details, Raymond (the son) was brainwashed by the Soviet Union and surprisingly his mother was also working with the Soviet Union. Indeed, the outcome finished with her assassination giving that it was an anti-communist movie from the
To get a clear view and understanding of the book, first must review the time period in history. The book was written in the mid 1950's during the cold war. Former General McCarthy, then U.S. Senator started a fire ball of suspicion, suppression, and incarceration. This had a very huge impact on the entrainment industry, which included everyone from playwrights to filmmakers, as well as writers and actors. If anyone in that time period was suspected of being a communist, the government could come and pull them out of their home. At the least a suspected communist would be banned, or put on a black ball list. Printed in the Times, McCarthy's First Slander, "Overnight, his speech sparked a media firestorm that played to the basest fears of Americans swept up in a frightening cold war and triggered loyalty oaths, blacklists and personal betrayals that cost an estimated 10,000 Americans their jobs and some shattered innocents their lives." (Johanna McGeary 28) This happened to a number of actors and film makers during that time period. The black ball list was a list of names of people who were believed to be communist. The people on this list came from the movie industry as well as writers. These people would no longer be able to get work ...
The first thing about this film that caught my eye from a sociological perspective is that the society in the film is not depicted as a “perfect society” as most films do, instead it shows the real conflicts that society had back then with certain subjects. The film shows us the prejudices, and misconceptions that people had about things like sex, and homosexuality at the time.
This is a movie in another movie that has a story from the past that is repeated nowadays: the same conflicts between exploited and exploiters, enslavement, injustice, protection of the public against those who put a price, and also the story of how the union of many sometimes gets what seemed
... the disbelief of the inhumane actions of the Nazis. Today, some people do not believe that the Holocaust ever happened. Society should accept the fact that the Holocaust happened and prevent it from happening in the future. By focusing on the traits that led to the Holocaust and society must prevent it from happening again. Poland’s tragedy claims to be a small proportion of the total number of people killed during the entire Holocaust. If the society decides not to survey for the trait, the Holocaust can always stir up again.
This shows that there is a lot of improvised housing in the time period. After this, the Little Tramp gets a job again at the same factory that he worked at before, but after a short time, the other workers go on strike again.... ... middle of paper ... ... Another different from the films is the law enforcement, the police were on the ball in Modern Times, they were there to do their duty and getting the Little Tramp in jail when he did the littlest thing wrong.
Classic narrative cinema is what Bordwell, Staiger and Thompson (The classic Hollywood Cinema, Columbia University press 1985) 1, calls “an excessively obvious cinema”1 in which cinematic style serves to explain and not to obscure the narrative. In this way it is made up of motivated events that lead the spectator to its inevitable conclusion. It causes the spectator to have an emotional investment in this conclusion coming to pass which in turn makes the predictable the most desirable outcome. The films are structured to create an atmosphere of verisimilitude, which is to give a perception of reality. On closer inspection it they are often far from realistic in a social sense but possibly portray a realism desired by the patriarchal and family value orientated society of the time. I feel that it is often the black and white representation of good and evil that creates such an atmosphere of predic...
Due to its level of reliability, the film is deemed as an extremely useful as the portrayal of the characters is accurately showing that there is good and bad in every person, for example, the Nazis who helped Wladek hide displaying that he does not have an extremely hostile attitude towards Wladek as the Nazi are generally portrayed to have. Due to the film, being a chronological factual recount of the life of Wladek during WWII Poland the film is not biased in any way or exhibits a negative attitude to either of these characters and who they represent therefore strengthening its usefulness. Additionally, the level of usefulness is strengthened to a greater extent as the clothes worn by the Polish and Jewish people it gives the audience insight into what Warsaw, Poland and its civilians were like
government enacted the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918 which led to the suppression of anti-war documents and sentiments, as well as the prosecution of over two-thousand individuals.#
One day each nation and citizen of the world will be judged by future generations. Every action and decision made today, good and bad, will eventually come under the scrutiny of a generation that did not participate in its making. Will their interpretations of history be correct or misplaced based on the evidence they are given? Can eye witness accounts or recorded events be denied or rewritten? A new law in Poland is challenging history in all of these forms and defying those who dare accuse any Polish citizen of participating in the Holocaust during World War II. This new law could result in up to 3 years in jail and heavy fines for using the phrase, "Polish death camps", or for making any reference that Polish citizens were complicit with Germany in helping to turn in or kill their Jewish neighbors during the Holocaust. While it's easy to
Run Lola Run, is a German film about a twenty-something woman (Lola) who has 20 minutes to find $100,000 or her love (Manni) will be killed. The search for the money is played through once with a fatal ending and one would think the movie was over but then it is shown again as if it had happened ten seconds later and changed everything. It is then played out one last time. After the first and second sequence, there is a red hued, narrative bridge. There are several purposes of those bridges that affect the movie as a whole. The film Run Lola Run can be analyzed by using the four elements of mise-en scene. Mise-en-scene refers to the aspects of film that overlap with the art of the theater. Mise-en-scene pertains to setting, lighting, costume, and acting style. For the purpose of this paper, I plan on comparing the setting, costume, lighting, and acting style in the first red hued, bridge to that of the robbery scene. Through this analysis, I plan to prove that the purpose of the narrative bridge in the film was not only to provide a segue from the first sequence to the second, but also to show a different side of personality within the main characters.
On the TV show, The Movie Show, David Stratton described the film as a “bold and timely film about the stolen generations.” The film is so highly rated for its amazing plot, the well-used mise en scene and the film techniques including the camera work and sound.
‘Das Leben der Anderen’ (The Lives of Others) is a striking example of how a director can convey narrative links within a film by employing various styles and film techniques. The Lives of Others relies upon these visual means to assist with the telling of the story as much as it relies upon the script. In this selected sequence of the film, several narrative links are drawn here to form the conclusion of ‘Operation Lazlo’. These narrative links are further cemented by Donnersmarck’s use of various lighting styles, diegtic and non-diegtic sound, revealing camera shots and intricate mise-en-scene.
"Divided We Fall," a Czech movie about hard decisions and loyalty, not to one's country, but to yourself, is protrayed very well by director Jan Hrebejk. This movie, considered a black comedy, is more than just a true story being told; it shows how hard it was for one family to conseal a Jewish person in their home.
The timing of this film was a significant factor in the story line. In the middle of the Great Depression unemployment and poverty were a major