Analyzing Due Process in Brisbane Supreme Court Hearings

1440 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effective criminal law enforcement

On the 10th and 14th of August, two sentencing hearings were observed. The two hearings were held at the Brisbane Supreme Court and lasted approximately three hours in total. This essay will describe the events that occurred during both trials, while critically discussing the aspects of the hearings and linking elements to the due process and the crime control model. Overall, both trials contained more aspects of the due process model than the crime control model. This can be seen in the manner the trials were conducted in, and the emphasis of upholding the rights of the accused.

The trials that were observed were both sentencing hearings. According to Sarre (2012, 445), a sentencing hearing occurs after the accused has been found guilty of the offences and is awaiting the judge to determine their sentence. Both of the trials observed were considerably long for a sentencing hearing even though all parties had been found guilty of their offences. The trials ran for approximately one and a half hours each. The length of the second trial could be explained by the defendant’s lawyer behaviour as she was …show more content…

Due process could be witnessed in the court upholding the rights of the accused as legal representation was present at the hearings as well as allowing two of the accused to receive a psychiatric report before receiving their sentences. It was further reflected in the judges beliefs about early criminal justice actors. The crime control model was reflected in the swift manner the first sentencing was conducted in. It can also be seen in the overall aim of the sentencing, which was to ensure the safety of the broader community by punishing the individual for their actions. Overall, the manner in which the trials were conducted, allowed for all of the participants to receive

Show More
Related

  • R V. Rogerson And Mcnamara Case Analysis

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    The conviction of guilty offenders when adhering to the guidelines of the NSW criminal trial process is not difficult based on the presumption of innocence. However, due to features of the criminal trial process, established by the adversarial system of trial, cases can often involve copious amounts of time and money, particularly evident in the case of R vs Rogerson and McNamara where factors such as time and money are demonstrated to be in excess. In addition, characteristics of the adversarial system such as plea bargaining has the power to hinder convictions due to the accused having the authority to hire experienced and expensive lawyers to argue their case, hence maintaining their innocence.

    Read More

  • Australian Legal Case: The Mabo Case

    382 Words  | 1 Pages

    Australian Legal Case: The Mabo Case The Mabo case commenced in the late 70's about an Aborigine Eddie Mabo who fought for his land on Murray Island, part of the Torres Strait. The issue that started the court case was when Mr Mabo appealed for a permit from the Queensland Government to visit the island. His proposal was declineed so he was unable to return home to visit his homeland.

    Read More

  • Highlighting Many of the Weaknesses in the Australian Legal System through the Chamberlain Case

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    in the country can afford the best lawyer and it is true to say that

    Read More

  • Section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    2803 Words  | 6 Pages

    One of the few purposes of the Section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is to ensure that the right for a fair trial for every person criminally tried on Canadian soil and the right for them to be tried within a reasonable time. This ensures that when the trial is commenced in court while the evidence is fresh and available during the trial. However, trials in the Canadian justice system can be delayed due to many factors in which the criticism could be on either the Crown or the accused. This essay will examine the Supreme Court of Canada case R. v. Morin. In this case, the accused was charged for impaired driving and the trial date set 399 days after the judge scheduled the trial. In total this was 444-days after the accused was charged with the impaired driving offence. The final verdict of this case set a precedent in the justice system due to the decision by the Ontario Court of appeal that decided that the trial delay was reasonable due to lack of prejudice to the accused during the delay.

    Read More

  • Why the court should have the right to impose a publication ban in Canada

    1821 Words  | 4 Pages

    Publication bans have been a part of the Criminal Code since 1988. A publication ban is a court law that prohibits trial information from leaving the case. Since these bans were first introduced in Canada, they have become a very useful tool in Common Law. These bans have been frequently used over the years for many purposes including avoiding the risk of adverse consequences to participants and for more accurate trial procedures. Having publication bans are beneficial, in every which-way, than not. These bans contribute positively to the environment of law and most importantly, the society within. This essay will outline why the court should have the right to impose a publication ban in Canada. It will support the debate that if Canada wishes to build towards a reputation of having trials handled efficiently, then it should not change the nature of these publication bans. It will portray the importance of these bans through a thorough explanation of how the bans work, and two solid arguments of the cause on the society and environment. First, this essay will discuss basics of publication bans and how they work. Then, this essay will point out how publication bans contribute to trial fairness in the court. Finally, this essay will touch upon how publication bans protect victims and those involved in the trials.

    Read More

  • Fairness in the Australian Legal System

    1299 Words  | 3 Pages

    Legal system is a comprehensive term that is used to confirm the existence of the law; it also explains the law-making process and how this is enforced on everyone. The Australian legal system regulates all level of governments, organisations, and all people whether they are Australian born or have migrated here, and they must obey Australia’s regulations. The legal system here was developed from the United Kingdom’s legal system, as Australia was a colony of the British. At a glance, the British government granted restricted rights to their colonies, including Australia to set local government system. This was intended to developed laws in local area, also to deal with specific situation at that time. As a result, the legal system in each of the colonies started to develop separately. According to Carvan J (2010) the Australian law is adopted from several sources, including the rules of equity, parliamentary laws, delegated legislations, judge-made laws, and international laws. (Austrlian Legal System, 2007)

    Read More

  • Argument Against Capital Punishment in Australia

    2208 Words  | 5 Pages

    Argumentative Essay on Capital Punishment in Australia Capital punishment is barbaric and inhumane and should not be re-introduced into Australia. Although capital punishment has been abolished, the debate on this topic has never abated. When a particularly heinous crime is committed, this debate arouses strong passions on both sides. Many who advocate the abolition of capital punishment consider the death penalty to be cruel and inhuman, while those who favor of punishment by death see it as a form of just retribution for the gravest of crimes. Determining whether Queensland should re-introduce capital punishment as a sentence will be the focus of this assignment.

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    The governance of our present day public and social order co-exist within the present day individual. Attempts to recognize the essentiality of equality in hopes of achieving an imaginable notion of structure and order, has led evidence based practitioners such as Herbert Packer to approach crime and the criminal justice system through due process and crime control. A system where packer believed in which ones rights are not to be infringed defrauded or abused was to be considered to be the ideal for procedural fairness. “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” Thomas Jefferson pg 9 cjt To convict an individual because proper consideration was not taken will stir up social unrest rather then it’s initial intent, when he or she who has committed the crime is not punished for their doings can cause for a repetition and even collaboration with other’s for a similar or greater crime.

    Read More

  • Cameras in the Courtroom

    2274 Words  | 5 Pages

    Viewing a judge's sentence creates a divide in society. Will the accused be offered a fair trial? Could t...

    Read More

  • Sentencing Of The Criminal Justice System

    1353 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sentencing is the process by which people who have been found guilty of offending against the criminal law have sanctions imposed upon them in accordance with that particular law. The sentence of the court is the most visible aspect of the criminal justice system’s response to a guilty offender. In Tasmania, the Sentencing Act 1997 was enacted to amend and consolidate the law relating to the sentencing of offenders. The crime rate in Tasmania is lower than it was 10 years ago but higher than it was 20 years ago. In the Australian context, Tasmania is below the national average of recorded crimes for the crimes of robbery, burglary and motor vehicle theft.

    Read More

  • Lepra 2002 Case Study

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    The prima facie principle of those charged under the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) is that they are ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ However, the Bail Amendment Act (2014) has undermined this by reversing the presumption of innocence for many indictable offences, as well as introducing a range of ‘show cause’ offences under s16A- requiring the defendant to demonstrate why detention is not justified. Furthermore, as the provision of bail has significantly reduced and remand populations increase, this accentuates cost inefficiencies on the criminal justice system, with prison populations exceeding an unprecedented 11 000 and annual tax payers bill exceeding $1.1 billion dollars (BOSCAR, 2015.) Recent amendments to the Bail Act (1978) have undermined the accused’s right to innocence and accentuated cost burdens on the criminal justice

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.

    Read More

  • The First Crime Recorded in the First Book of the Bible

    881 Words  | 2 Pages

    How far would one have to think back in history that the first reported criminal trial happened? Would it be similar or different than the ones held today? What would it be about? Would the punishment be similar to ones that are issued today? This article by William R. Riddell gives the audience an inside look to what happened in history on that fateful day.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Abolishing The Death Penalty

    1653 Words  | 4 Pages

    “ ….Judgments, right or wrong. This concern with concepts such as finality, jurisdiction, and the balance of powers may sound technical, lawyerly, and highly abstract. But so is the criminal justice system….Law must provide simple answers: innocence or guilt, freedom or imprisonment, life or death.” (Baude, 21).

    Read More

  • The Australian Legal System

    1294 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Australian Legal System has a rich and detailed history dating from 1066. Law is made in Parliament. We have four sources of law and three courts with different jurisdictions that interpret the law when giving out justice. Important doctrines act as the corner-stones of our legal system. There is a procedure in the courts for making appeals. Separation of powers exists between officials in the courts, the parliament and the Executive. Everyone in Australia is treated equally under the Rule of Law, no matter their office or status. The Law is always changing as society changes, but it can never be perfect and cannot please everyone.

    Read More

More about Analyzing Due Process in Brisbane Supreme Court Hearings

Open Document