Compare And Contrast Oedipus And Hamlet

1067 Words3 Pages

Tragic Heroes: Oedipus vs. Hamlet Aristotle once said, “A man doesn’t become a hero until he can see the root of his own downfall”. There is usually some kind of tragedy in drama, involving the character’s life and his/her conflict. The character’s struggle is expressed to an audience through actions and emotions in a theatrical act. In these acts, sometimes a hero is the one experiencing the conflict, known as the “tragic hero”. In order to be considered a “tragic hero”, he must pass Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero, which involves the five specific characteristics. The tragedy begins with an error that the hero commits in judgement, leading to his downfall, which he recognizes through his actions and excessive pride. All these characteristics
Oedipus finds out that he is the one who killed his father, Laius, the king of Thebes, “when the combined testimonies of the Corinthian Messenger and the Theban Shepherd make[s] [him] realize that he 's unwittingly fulfilled the prophecy he [has] struggled to avoid (Schmoop Editorial Team). He was very upset as he shouts, “O, O, O, they will all come, all come out clearly! Light of the sun, let me look upon you no more after today! I who first saw the light bred of a match accursed, and accused in my living with them I lived with, cursed in my killing” (Sophocles 1248-1252). The man that Oedipus kills as he is escaping from his prophecy, at the crossroads, ends up being his biological father. The determination and urgency that Oedipus had in finding the king’s murderer in regards to helping his “children” from the plague caused him to find out the truth of his identity. The recognition of the devastating truth of his origin really played an important role in the outcome of his

Open Document