The World Trade Organization

Lastly through the reduction of trade barriers it can lead to trade creation, which occurs when, the consumption switches from high cost producers to low cost producers. This creation of trade can help not only the economy but consumers as well and have many positive effects. Free trade reduces the prices of goods and services to consumers. These lower prices are a result of increased competitiveness when a country opens its borders. There is more competition therefore this pushes the prices that domestic producers charge down because a lot of the imported goods coming in are cheaper therefore the producer surplus decreases but the consumers surplus increases (Feenstra, 2011).

It is not doubtful that consumers in the developing countries could always get benefits from trade liberalization as they can buy the cheaper goods and enjoy the high quality products. In addition, exporters also get benefits from trade liberalization, because they have larger markets. However, producers face the opportunities and challenges in developing countries. Considering that the producers with more productive will get the benefits, but the less efficient ones will get the loss. Obviously, when international competition increases, producers will take more pressures to improve their productivity to meet the needs of the international market.

If an enterprise make a large profit, other enterprises are bound to enter into the specific market to capture some of the high returns. This attracts other businesses to enter into the market and eventually their competition will drive down the prices and eventually eliminate monopoly power (Stigler 2008). Foreign competition and the opening of markets cause implications to existing monopolies in a country and they have a significant economic effect on the industry profit rates. The less restrictive trade policies that are in place encourage more competitive pricing behaviour in domestic markets and have a negative effect on the domestic producers profit rates (Espinosa & Espinosa 2014, p. 343).... ... middle of paper ... ... numerous positive aspects of international trade, some of them include a boost in economic growth, both locally and nationally as well as creates a fairer competitive market space. The outcomes of international trade are explained throughout this essay.

If a country it prone to levy tariffs on items that an organization may need, it would increase the risk of doing business while located in that company. By having a country manufacture or produce product that can be done for less elsewhere is not a wise utilization of resources and in turn harms global trade. When foreign countries can enter a home country and sell product for less, people usually see this as a great trade opportunity. However, if that product is manufactured in the home country then the home country not only loses revenue from sales on that product but the economic impacts can run even deeper. With no need to manufacture that product companies will no longer need to purchase the raw materials or hire the employees necessary to maintain the demand.

Companies who provide cheaper made products, can cause a deficit for any country by flooding their economy with these exports. Fair trade prevent this and provides developing countries with the opportunity to provide merchandise that is not readily provided to the consumer. Fair trade helps provides jobs in developing countries and protect them from the abuses of monopolization. To solve this problem, there must be a fair exchange for goods and services. If these practices are allowed to continue, we as the consumer, will be paying higher prices at the stores.

This is due to the welfare state losing full control over their policies as the global interconnectedness of global markets increase. Using the two different hypotheses of compensation and effectiveness, this essay will attempt to fully explain both arguments in terms of social welfare spending. The compensation hypothesis claims that the increasing interconnectedness of economies leads to an increase in social welfare spending, which in turn enables an upward shift of taxation. Therefore, there is a positive correlation between economic openness and public spending. The countries and the countries with the largest welfare states are also tend to be the most economically open ones.

Officially Globalisation can be defined as the “process of interaction and integration among the people, companies, and governments of different nations, a process driven by international trade and investment and aided by information technology.”2 But if it’s that simple then why are some countries so reluctant in opening up their borders ?Today globalisation is much more controlled and there are many organisations present and active to help countries achieve globalisation. One of the main elements of the process of globalisation is the process of “Laissez Faire” or free trade. According to this principle, it is believed that the best option for countries is to engage in free trade and that state interaction should be kept to minimum. Economic principles like theory of Absolute Advantage and theory of Competitive Advantage explain the concept of free trade and support that minimum state intervention is the best for any nation. But this does not always stand true.

In turn, the countries all benefit from each other. The markets will dictate what the driving forces are, but for now, the largest driving force in the world’s economy today is technology. The effects of globalization can be seen in many different organizations and even communities across the US. Regional trading blocs help countries that would normally not be a participant in the world market. Globalization is will only make this world’s economy stronger.

First, I will examine if globalisation actually has strengthened and benefited industries in developing nations. One of the major advantages of globalisation to LEDC’s is that trade barriers are significantly lowered or removed completely. This promotes and encourages exports to new countries because before LEDC’s simply could not afford to export their goods to major countries such as USA or UK due to high import taxes they have set, so it was simply not worth it. But with free access to new markets LEDC’s have access to a much greater customer base and that should, in theory, significantly boost economic growth. Empiri... ... middle of paper ... ...hat idea from functioning properly.

Countries with low inflation rates will have a higher currency since there is an increase in purchasing power., but high inflation will decrease the value of the currency. The balance of payment includes all financial transactions with in a country and the balance of trade describes the difference between a country’s imports and exports. A surplus in the balance of payment would increase the national currency while a depreciation in the balance of payment would decrease it. Also a positive balance of trade, which means that there are more exports than imports, would increase the currency value because there is an increasing demand in a country’s currency. But a trade deficit would result in a currency depreciation for a country since there is more outflow of monetary payments to other countries.