The Walking Dead Vs. Law And Order

547 Words2 Pages

In the U.S. today, Television is an everyday normality of the average human life. The average viewer at home watches TV at least 4 to 5 hours a day at home. There are so many popular must see programs such as The Walking Dead and Law and Order which are both ongoing series that are share a similarity in audience appeal, but if contrasting have completely different areas such as subject matter, actors’ ability to assume their tv persona, and the likelihood of surprising incidents. The Walking Dead’s likelihood of surprising events is abundant. Throughout the seasons, there is a pressing issue like a horde that is closing in, but a survivor has problems with another survivor and does something drastic causing suspense then and a surprising event/problem …show more content…

The subject matter of The Walking Dead is the hope and fight for survival. The series begins in Atlanta, Georgia with the a sheriff, Rick Grimes who enters a police shootout and sustains an injury causing him to enter a coma. While in a coma, the zombie apocalypse spreads and humanity is falling. Whereas Law and Order is a very serious drama series following two New York detectives who attempt to solve brutal crimes that happen in their city while trying to deal with stress of being a police officer. The subject matter of Law and Order is serving justice to those who commit serious felonies. The Walking Dead’s lead actor, Andrew Lincoln can accept his tv persona without a doubt splendidly. Andrew Lincoln is an British actor with a noticeable change in tone, accent, pitch for his normal voice. In the show, Rick is an American sheriff and doesn’t show sign of accent, and changes his tone and pitch, handling the role in a positive unique manner. However in Law and Order, the two main characters are Lennie Briscoe and Edward Green played by Jerry Orbach and Jesse L. Martin assume their TV personas to an extent, but seem too generic and could be handled in a better

Open Document