The Unnatural Kingdom By Daniel Duaney Analysis

1212 Words3 Pages

Daniel Duane addresses a pressing modern anxiety surrounding technology’s destruction of the natural world. Duane is an author of seven books and many articles featured in The New York Times and Food & Wine. Also an editor for Men’s Journal, Duane’s experiences in rock climbing, science, and the beauty of the outdoors make his writings seem more passionate and credible. He recently wrote the article “The Unnatural Kingdom” in The New York Times explaining his ideas towards technological advancements and their effects on wildlife. In his article, Duane offers insights to the question, “If technology helps save the wilderness, will the wilderness still be wild?” (Duane 1). He utilizes kairos, pathos, ethos, logos, and other rhetorical devices, …show more content…

One strength of his article is that it can easily elicit an emotional response from the more sympathetic readers and outdoor enthusiasts. Duane appeals to pathos when first setting the scene of a day in the wilderness. He describes what it would be like if one had the “good fortune” to spot a Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep in the wild. He writes, “You unwrap a chocolate bar amid breathtaking views . . . the sight fills you with awe and also with gratitude for the national parks, forests, and yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive” (Duane 1). For the audience that connects to this emotional appeal, this instantly draws them in to the article and can arouse feelings of amazement and wonder toward the sight described. It can likewise leave readers wondering whether or not this scene is truly so perfect. This statement can also appear too dramatic for those less passionate. When Duane writes, “The sight fills you with . . . gratitude for the . . . yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive,” it seems almost untrue, as most people do not think twice about the environmental regulations that keep animals in their …show more content…

He does this because his facts are shocking in themselves. Duane writes, “Grizzlies are the California state animal . . . despite the fact that no grizzly has been sighted in California since wolves disappeared, in 1924” (Duane 8). Duane also mentions, “People have always manipulated the natural world” (Duane 3), and then supports it with facts such as, “The most primitive farms are human-managed ecosystems; European aristocrats fenced off game reserves in Middle Ages . . . government agencies have long dumped hatchery-raised trout into streams so that we can have fun catching them” (Duane 4). These facts alone are self-explanatory and surprising. By additionally stating the facts in a negative manner and context, Duane enhances his

Open Document