The Taisho Period

965 Words2 Pages

The Taisho period was known for the term Taisho democracy and the increased embrace of democratic values by the Japanese society following the reforms undertaken during the Meiji period as Japan moved from a feudal system of governance to a crude form of representative government. I will be arguing that this embrace was severely limited in scope, distorted when evaluated past the veil of Taisho period rhetoric at specific levels of analysis and even reversed in the latter years of the Taisho period, providing the structural base for Japan’s slide towards militarism and totalitarianism due to a number of structural factors within the Japanese polity, …show more content…

Even with the introduction of male suffrage near the end of the Taisho period and the expanded role of party politics in the elections of members to the House of Representatives of the Imperial Diet, the democratic autonomy of the Imperial Diet in the first half of the Taisho period and the “trias politica” principle was constrained by the influence of Genro (retired elder statesmen who became advisors to the Emperor) over the appointment of the executive. Within the Meiji Constitution, officially known as “The Constitution of the Empire of Japan”, chapter 3 deals with the Imperial Diet. Chapter 3 entails 21 articles regarding the Imperial Diet yet at no poflawnt within those 21 articles there is mentioning of the appointment of the executive{1 Ito,Miyoji;}. Keeping aside the fact that one of the most influential political parties of the Taisho era, Rikken Seiyukai, was founded by Ito Hirobumi (a Genro himself) and thus a legacy (Ito Hirobumi was assassinated in 1909) of the oligarchy rule (which lasted until 1918) originating from the Sat-Cho framework, the hallmarks of Genro influence even in the Taisho era was reflected in the appointment of the Yamamoto Gonnohyoe as Prime Minister following

Open Document