Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay of meursaults development in the stranger
The stranger albert camus symbolism bartleby
A critique on the stranger by albert camus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay of meursaults development in the stranger
As a whole humanity goes through life experiencing it day by day. By seeking the importance of life many are able to see that being a part of society can come with great value. With actions being the way we gear our paths, the main character Meursault took a huge step in importance of life as he confronted the chaplain. In “The Stranger” by Albert Camus, Meursault takes on the phenomenological approach to personality through the catharsis of suppressed anger towards the chaplain, an impactful stranger. Upon Camus’ selection of a stranger to display Meursault’s realization to the existentialist concern of revolt, readers cease to believe human interchangeability is possible.
An aspect of existentialism is that life has no inherent meaning, it has to be constructed through the justification of one’s actions. The realization of temporary existence treads on through human evolution. Humans try to gain contact with experiences to be alive and aware. Meursault went through his days absentmindedly, even through the most impactful events such as his mother’s death. The novel continued to have the same pace going about Meursault’s unemotional reactions,
…show more content…
This notion disagrees with the idea of revolt which sees life as hopeless and vain, “Actually, I was sure of myself, sure about everything, far surer than he; sure of my present life and of the death that was coming. That, no doubt, was all I had;” (Camus 74). Meursault realizes that his life meant something despite the uninvolved way he lived it. The hope of human interchangeability is pathetic as Meursault argues in this scene. Having his life planned out for the remainder of his existence made him all the more appreciate and see that it was all he had to look forward to. Arguing that to live for some meaning in some other supposed life is to not live at
Originally released in French, The Stranger by Albert Camus (published in 1942) follows the story of Meursault whom is a French man living in Algeria prior to the 2nd World War and gives his own unique perspective of the events between when he receives a telegram stating that his mother had recently pass away to when he is executed for the murder of a man only referred to as “The Arab” whom he had shot. Meursault had an interesting outlook on life and it is unclear why he feels the way he does but his tone is constantly detached, plain, and at times subtly ironic. That is the key reason this book is referred to as a panicle example of existentialism and also corresponds with the quote;
Meursault is a fairly average individual who is distinctive more in his apathy and passive pessimism than in anything else. He rarely talks because he generally has nothing to say, and he does what is requested of him because he feels that resisting commands is more of a bother than it is worth. Meursault never did anything notable or distinctive in his life: a fact which makes the events of the book all the more intriguing.
However, upon deciding to kill a man, he quickly learns that his previous unconcern will not diminish the consequences for his deed. Put to death, Meursault remains stagnant on his opinion of justice, refusing to ever consider that justice possesses any worth. Upon receiving a visit from a chaplain hours before his execution, he merely uttered “I had been right, I was still right, I was always right” (Camus 121) Meursault did not understand why the chaplain wanted to force him to turn to God and gain a moral sense about life. Thus he simply reiterated the motto that he lived by: an apathetic, self-absorbed idea that nothing in life means anything. Meursault’s continual refusal to accept the moral standards of the world prohibited him from every truly finding a true sense of
While coming to terms with the absurd was a gradual process for Meursault, his final days and his heated conversation with the chaplain, and his desire for a hateful crowd of spectators show that he was able to accept the absurdity, and revel in it, finding satisfaction in spite of those around him and justifying his murder. His ego had reached an all-time high as he neared his execution, and his satisfaction left him prepared for the nothingness awaiting him. This process was a natural psychological response to his mortality, for his peace of mind. Therefore, Meursault is not the Stranger, an alien to society, but a troubled man seeking meaning and satisfaction in a life and a world that was overwhelming unsatisfactory and absurd.
I, Albert Camus, am a famous French author who had written The Stranger in 1942. I was born in Algeria, and my experiences there had deeply influenced my thoughts, my work, and my philosophies. The Stranger strongly represents my philosophy involving the absurd and existentialism. When I was twenty-five, I moved to France and joined the resistance movement during World War II. After the liberation from Nazi Germany, I became a political journalist and a columnist for Combat, a French newspaper. In 1947, I retired from my journalist career and continued to write fiction and playwrights for the theatre (Simpson). Although I primarily consider myself a writer instead of a philosopher and I deny being an existentialist, the philosophy I most agree with is indeed existentialism. As one will find in my novel, The Stranger, the main character Meursault views the world and situations through an outside perspective, extreme detachment, and a lack of empathy. His characters tend to view the world as an outsider because I personally grew up in many groups
In Albert Camus’s The Stranger, Meursault, the protagonist, could be seen as immoral if he were judged on the basis of his actions alone. However, through Camus’s use of a first person narrative, we begin to understand Meursault as not an immoral man, but simply an indifferent one. Meursault is a symbol of the universe, and so in understanding him we understand that the universe is also not evil, but instead a place of gentle indifference.
... social institution. When Meursault leaves the constraints of time he is much happier and has time to think about everything he needs to do. And sense he has time to think about what he needs he then leaves society all together. This is the final social institution that there is a commentary on. Without having to follow what is set upon him by society he can do and think what he wants, and because of that he even understands why Moman did what she did at the end of her life. With all of these social commentaries there are many points in the novel when existentialist ideas are shown and also show how import existentialism is in this novel.
Meursault lives an average life, but one important factor in the story is that he does not seem to express his emotions. Some of his character traits could label Meursault as an existentialist because he does not care about anything except physical things. When his mother died, many other people were crying, but all Meursault worried about was the heat. He is very honest as well, and he does not try to cover up the fact that he did not cry during his mother’s funeral.... ...
Meursault, an unemotional, a moral, sensory-orientated character at the beginning of the book, turns into an emotional, happy man who understands the "meaninglessness" and absurdity of life by the end of the book. Meursault realizes that the universe is indifferent to man's life and this realization makes him happy. He realizes that there is no God and that the old codes of religious authoritarianism are not enough to suffice man's spiritual needs. One has to create one's won meaning in an absurd, meaningless world.
At the point when Albert Camus' novel, The Stranger, was first distributed in 1942, numerous readers did not comprehend what to consider Meursault, the morally separated character of Camus' novel. His absurdist confused the people around him and made them question his meaningless actions throughout the book. It was not just the characters who did not comprehend Meursault very well, it was the readers also. The characters in Camus' novel didn’t seem to understand Meursault’s reasoning. Camus titled this novel, fitting to the main character, Meursault, who is isolated from companions, society, and even himself, because of his different morals and standards.
...everyone is surrounded by death. Camus explains that life isn’t about what is not envisioned, but it’s about what is evident. Meursault’s feeling of apathy is directly related to his conviction that life lacks necessary order and meaning, “As if that blind rage had washed me clean, rid me of hope…I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world,” as he awaits his impending death, he finally recognizes that life is the most complex entity in the universe and one only has one life to live, so live it wisely (122). In the end, Meursault changed spiritually because he didn’t concentrate as much on the physical world because while he was in prison, he thought about life’s gifts and (although still atheist) realizes that faith in yourself and life is very important. There is also some irony here; he finally realizes the meaning of live just as he awaits his death.
In archetypal literature, light is clarifying. It represents truth, honesty, and enlightenment. Meursault, however, finds light to be “inhuman and oppressive” (15). The constant descriptors of light are stifling and dreary. As he sits in prison waiting for his execution, the sunrise is dreadful; it signals despair, not the freedom and rebirth that a new day usually signifies. This different implementation of technique further emphasizes how Meursault does not fit in with his society. His refusal to play by the rules, especially revealed in his rejection of religion, supports the greater argument of the novel: there is no inherent meaning or higher power in the universe. Meursault does not care whether he moves to Paris or marries Marie for the sole reason that “life isn’t worth living;” a belief that he holds from the beginning of the novel until the night before his execution (114). Established as an unusual, distant protagonist who is difficult to relate to, Meursault attributes no particular meaning to life. He even shows disdain for the emotional and metaphysical values others hold. Nothing extracts feelings of empathy from Meursault, not even Raymond’s anger toward his mistress, his neighbor Salamano’s longing for his dog and late wife, or Marie’s love. Therefore, Meursault’s emotional separation, emphasized by written descriptions of light, connects to his repudiation of
It is true that Meursault was different from the rest of society. However, he changes throughout the trial and eventually becomes an existentialist hero. This is because he finds meaning in life. It is ironic, though, that he learns to appreciate life after his is effectively over. His apathetic approach to life is made clear from the first page: “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know.” This foreshadows his approach to everything else in the book. His indifference to Maman’s death contrast’s significantly to Salamano’s distress at losing his dog. Many of the characters in this book also function to highlight his qualities through contrast.
Though being independent of societal ideals would be considered detrimental to whom such ideals apply to, Meursault is strikingly complacent, given he lives to please himself rather than society, noting: “...I looked up at the mass of signs and stars in the night sky and laid myself open for the first time to the benign indifference of the world. And finding it so much like myself, in fact so fraternal, I realized that I’d been happy, and that I was still happy” (2.5.117). Through Meursault, Camus suggests that society is imperfect and human, through its impeccable facade. To fret over being an outcast to a false sense of perfection is useless when acting upon one’s own happiness, and not what society’s projection of happiness would be. Even before Meursault’s impending execution, he was clearly content with what had become of his life because he was living for himself. Ultimately, Camus conveys the idea that society is unreasonable because a fear of seclusion is a motivating factor in blindly conforming to common ideals rather than one’s true passions in life. Life is seemingly futile if no true happiness exists within, yet many people live to unnecessary standards regardless. Camus does not comply with societal standards, and would not be able to understand the idea of blind belief, such as that in
Albert Camus wrote The Stranger during the Existentialist movement, which explains why the main character in the novel, Meursault, is characterized as detached and emotionless, two of the aspects of existentialism. In Meursault, Camus creates a character he intends his readers to relate to, because he creates characters placed in realistic situations. He wants the reader to form a changing, ambiguous opinion of Meursault. From what Meursault narrates to the reader in the novel, the reader can understand why he attempts to find order and understanding in a confused and mystifying world.