The Similarities Between The Crips And Bloods

1671 Words4 Pages

The Crips and Bloods that the American society has come to know are commonly, and rightfully, thought of in a negative light. The same can be said for Americans view on the U.S Congress. While they are the same in this aspect, one may assume that while both take on negative auras, it is for vastly different reasons. Despite this, it is safe to say that they have many more similarities than one may initially think when looked at through the three main lenses of Sociology. Simply looking at the racial composition of both groups exemplifies both similarity and difference. Both the U.S Congress and the Crips/Bloods are made of diversity lacking members. White people are the overwhelming majority when looking at the U.S Congress, taking up over …show more content…

Representation and protection are a common thread when comparing these two groups. While it is fairly obvious that Congress is structured around representation, with its members representing the fifty states of the U.S, so are the street gangs. The Crips were originally formed because of a man who was a member of the Black Panther Party (Fanon 63), an organization created for the protection of African American people mistreated by Police officers in the 1960s. Due to the outlandish treatment that was imposed upon the African American community during that time, the Black Panther party was formed. The Black Panthers served as not only a form of protection from the police, but as a representation of the community. Not simply representation of their people, but of their struggles as minorities in the racist environment of Los Angeles during that …show more content…

Most street gangs make their money the same way, illegally. Money that is made by the Bloods/Crips is primarily obtained through the selling of drugs, theft, and killing (Peralta). They do this because, for the most part, they have no other way of obtaining jobs due to the oppressive system they live in. The money they make is for their survival. On the other hand, there's Congress, whose main purpose for making money is election. Running campaigns cost money. In 2016, the average winning Senate candidate had spent 10.4 million dollars on their campaigns (Kim). The main way the U.S Congress receives its money is through taxes. In essence, this is just taking money from other people. Taxes may be how they receive their formal salaries, but for a very long time, Congress members have been looked at as immoral in the way they make money. Earmarks, which is money for public projects, are abused in a way that ends up giving the Congressmen money for personal use. In fact, when looking at The Washington Posts analysis in 2012, 55 members of Congress received money for projects that would essentially aid their own outside business or companies (Fallis). In the end, both the street gangs and Congress seem to have immoral ways of getting money. In contrast, the street gangs have a less discreet and sly way of doing

Open Document