The Pruitt Igoe Myth Analysis

1265 Words3 Pages

The Pruitt Igoe Myth- Documentary
The Pruitt-Igoe Myth9 is a documentary film about the history of the Pruitt-Igoe housing complex, in St. Louis, Missouri. Directed by Chad Freidrichs, the movie released in 2011. The 80 minutes documentary includes interviews with former tenants about their experience and what they recall.
Images and short videos are illustrated to give a proper feel of the scene. ''Powerful story with a dramatic end'', as stated in the movie, the complex and its people experience steady deterioration of living conditions during the 1960s and early 1970s. It all ends by planned implosion of the buildings between 1972 and 1976.
The movie gives several theories for the failure of the Pruitt-Igoe complex that led to its destruction. The list also include mistake in the general notion of public housing or a slip of the modernist theory of architecture itself.

Following is a detailed outlook of how and possible why's of the failure of the Pruitt Igoe housing complex.

The start of something new
57-acres, 33 buildings,11-storey slab blocks-The Pruitt-Igoe public housing complex was designed by Minoru Yamasaki, a Japanese architect. The city decided to demolish a large region of shabby houses and set up instead Le Corbusier's dream.

The complex was designed in the early 1950s and construction was completed in 1955. The city planned two partitions: Pruitt for the black residents, and Igoe Apartments for whites. Streets on all sides enclosed the site. Upon its completion, the world's architecture magazines commended it as a beautiful example of International Style housing.

Many architects of the time believed it was just the way to alleviate poverty and to heal society's ills. An Architectural Forum titled "Slum S...

... middle of paper ...

...ap suburban dwellings facilitated open up the tight inner-city rental market to blacks. Many chose to live in cheap private houses instead of going for public housing.
There is a direct relationship between physical environments and human behaviour. According to Newman (1996)4, ''the widespread vandalism and violence resulted from the presence of excessive 'exposed' public spaces''. He continues by saying that ''public housing should provide an appropriate amount of private, semiprivate, and public space''.
An architect is controlled by the attitudes and conceptions of the clients and society.
This example of rational architecture failed because it divorced residents from personal and communal ownership of public spaces (Cendon 2012)7. The failure of Pruitt-Igoe was less of an architectural aesthetic failure and more of a planning, policy, and sociological one.

Open Document