When looking at attending class from the perspective of a college student it should hopefully be easy to understand why you should attend. For most students the answer would consist of something along the lines of ‘to better educate myself’ or ‘so I can get a better paying job’, both of which seem plausible. However, those from past generations and those with different demographics might look at this question much differently, due to a college education not always being a necessity to become successful in life. Therefore older generations may have looked at skipping class in a different light than a 20 year-old would today. With much higher stakes to do well in both primary and higher education courses causes cutting class to carry great risk …show more content…
However, the idea of being successful is interpreted differently by those who carry a different socioeconomic status. This status is based upon one’s social class and their income, which is what gives the term successful such a wide range of definitions. This also often times goes hand in hand with how class attendance and performance is judged by parents of college students. With a higher socioeconomic status comes more money within the family, and in turn causes higher income families to send their kids to bigger and more expensive four-year universities that require more work in harder classes than more two-year community colleges. Harder classes with all the homework thrown on top can make it difficult for anyone from any socioeconomic background to excel, add skipping classes to this equation and it may seem near impossible to excel. This is where the family bank account comes into play. When kids don’t attend class and their grades follow suit by dropping wealthier families have the option to come out and say their kid gave it ‘the good ole college try’ and help finance another path to help them become successful. As for the other end of the spectrum, lower class families are often times putting a first generation college student into a position to help them move up the socioeconomic ladder with a college degree. Although, with tuition prices for a four-year out-of-state college averaging about $23,000 and in-state sits at roughly $10,000 the obvious choice for lower income families is a two-year community college that is a third of a four-year in-state university which is $3,300 (collegeboard). With such a large portion of their hard-earned savings invested into their children’s future the kids have a lot more on their shoulders to do well and attend
First, attending college effects financial awareness. College needs to reduce the cost of their tuition to help students that are struggling financially. The benefit of lowering college tuition fees including the fact that higher education is often a standard job requirement in many fields, but also that lower tuition costs increases the accessibility of education, which in turn creates social mobility that is often beneficial to the economy. Freeman Hrabowski, President of the University of Maryland, Baltimore County read an article by New York Times called “College is for Suckers.” He mentions that the article “echoes an increasingly common refrain that college is too expensive, that students are taking unmanageable debt.” (Hrabowski 259). even though Freeman states that there are college prep
people agree with the state that Liz borrows from Thomas Jefferson, "Everybody should have an education proportional to their life,"(Addison 256). Unfortunately, the average income between rich and poor in America is not accurate, everyone supposed to become somebody in life; college gives opportunity to everyone who wants to do so, to become whatever they want, and at any age with a low cost. as much as the income level between rich and poor in America stays unbalanced; college will always be there to gives opportunity to people who want to learn, but cannot afford to attend university. Liz Addison points out an example in the article. It describes “a college application essay workshop for low-income students” (Addison 256). This is suitable for low-income students, but it doesn’t mention an education at universities. People who go to community college have a lot trouble to find jobs which can allow them to pay their debt after graduate. However, in university you are more likely to find and job and be able to pay your
Many are expecting college to be expensive. They worry about how much they can afford and having to make payment arrangements. Some go as far as to think only rich people can afford to go to college. There is a thought that you have to have good credit to get a loan that takes forever to pay back. Many are not aware of the programs that are o...
An article from the Ojibwe News, a Native American Magazine, gives a startling statistic discovered by research analysts for the Minnesota Private College Research Foundation. They found that a child from a family earning $25,000 or less annually is only one-half as likely to enroll in college as a child from a family with an annual income of $50,000 or more.
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford, a famous hunter, finds himself on Ship-Trap Island after falling overboard a yacht. After arriving on the island, he meets its owner, General Zaroff, another avid hunter. He soon discovers that General Zaroff has grown bored of hunting animals, and now he hunts men he traps on the island. The protagonist, Rainsford and the
In the short story, The Most Dangerous Game, the author Richard Connell compels the reader to contemplate how one’s perspective can affect their daily lives. One’s perspective can be connected to their morals, and influence their actions. Their experiences may also cause their perspective on a situation to change. (Topic sentence) Zaroff sees no moral implications with hunting people, as he believes that they are there for his pleasure. He sees them as his next challenge and has no issue with moving on to them when he gets bored of hunting animals. In Zaroff’s mind, he is the hunter and the people he hunts are the huntees. It was irrelevant to him that they are humans, as it is merely a game to him, and he feels entitled to kill them. Zaroff
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Rainsford and Zaroff share similar mentalities about hunting, but have vastly different view on the world and the values of human life that ultimately leads Rainsford to make the choice to kill Zaroff for the greater good. One of the major differences are their morals. Rainsford values human life and thinks it is wrong to hunt a man. As Rainsford and Zaroff meet, they seem a lot alike, but as the relationship between Zaroff and Rainsford evolves, it becomes increasingly clear how different they truly are. An example of this is when Zaroff proposes that the go hunting together for humans and Rainsford replies: “what you speak of is murder!”(8).
Rainsford does, indeed, consider himself superior to General Zaroff. Both the General and Rainsford think they are superior to the other and make this obvious by the way they talk to each other. (SSVV) Rainsford and the General act as if they are better than each other. They try to one up each other every chance they get. (SSV) He also thinks he better after he knows when the General is an accomplice, and that what he does for hunting is wrong. (I,cI) I think some of these thoughts may come from him being an author of books that the General has read and he loved his books. “"I've read your book about hunting snow leopards in Tibet, you see.” Also, the General treats him with respect as if he is more superior than him, when he raises his hand
In the book, General Zaroff says, “Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting.” In the book. Rainsford says, “Hunting? Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder.” This shows that General Zaroff kills people instead of animals. General Zaroff starts telling Rainsford about his hunting and what he does. General Zaroff doesn’t think it is murder, he thinks it’s hunting. Rainsford calls him out on the murder and tells him that is what it actually is. When General Zaroff goes out and hunts people and kills them it symbolizes
Steve Cohen shows the disparity between the rising cost of college and a family’s capability to afford it. Cohen explains “Tuition has risen almost 1,200 percent in the last 35 years, and the sticker price for many four-year private colleges and out-of-state public universities exceeds $250,000.” Moreover, he goes on to say that even at public universities, it is about $80,000 for four years for tuition and other college related expenses. Later in his article, Cohen explains how this leaves middle-class families in a very uncomfortable situation. The parents or other money-making entities in the household want their student to go to college and earn a degree, but now there can be an element of stress in figuring out how the fees will be paid for. Furth...
“Ditching class” has now become something of the past. Unlike high school, classes cost money. Paying for education makes it to where the people who actually want to be there will be, rather than idlers that are there only by force. No one cares if you skip class. Everything, including the grade, is up to the student. Although half the time, professors rarely even take role, missing one class can result in not understanding the newt two weeks worth of work or more. Choose to go to class or not, but if not, the student is paying to fail a class.
If you graduate from college, and want to start a family one day. Your choice in going will amplify your children’s interest in going as well. If you expect your children to go to college but you did not, then who is to blame for their poor decision? Going to college now can start a tradition in your family that could live on for decades. Research shows that someone with a bachelor’s degree makes almost two times more than one who does not have one. High school graduates make an average of $28,000 and college graduates with a four-year degree make $45,500. It is also proven that the unemployment rate is lower for people who have a bachelor’s degree. As a result high school graduates are more prone to living in poverty once out of high school. College should be a requirement because many college graduates earn more than high school graduates. Bill Gates is the most successful man in the world and he went to college. Carlos Slim is the second richest man in the world and he too went to college. What I am trying to say is that the top two wealthiest and successful people in the world have gone to some degree of secondary education. This is not complicated math. If you go to college you will increase your probability of becoming successful or becoming even more
Going to college and furthering someone’s future career is a very important part of life.. Making the choice of going to college or not going to college could affect someone for the rest of their life, If a student decides to go to college after high school they will be in debt for many years after they graduate college. “Over the past decade, tuition and fees have risen much faster than inflation and outpaced the cost of housing and health care” (Blumenstyk). Blumenstyk is showing how outrageous the cost of college tuition has become. Whether it is for a University or a Community college either one. Most people spend their whole lives being in debt just because of buying a house and now they will have the burden of paying off their college tuition as well. They may keep getting a bill in the mail that most of them will hate looking at, and also putting down that much money each month for their payment. While college does create the opportunity of increased pay and better jobs, it should not mean students are required to pay all the money they earn back the college. At that point people may as well not go to a
But what’s more important? Saving money orapplying to college? So here we ask ourselves on more time, is college worth it? Of course, it is.The more colleges you apply for, the better. Expanding your college options are better thanlimiting yourself with a budget.The cost of tests and applications may be high, but that is nothing compared to how muchcollege really costs. In college, you’re not just paying for the opportunity to learn. You arepaying for books, to rooming, to the grass you step on, and to the air you breathe. A student withno subsidizing means to pay for college can find themselves amidst a nightmare when findingout how much college costs. The cost is so high that an “average of $29,400” (Webber 2) isexpected for a single student’s loans. College tuition, is not lenient, and you know it’s bad whenalmost former president Barack Obama mentioned and “criticized the rising rate of collegetuition” (Gutmann 136). The average cost of college can “range from $3,000 to more than$32,000” (How Much Will College Cost Me? 1). And for low-income students? The statisticssay that “only 52 percent of low-income students enrolled in a…college immediately upongraduating” (Elliot 26). The game is not in the favor of low-income students. In fact, collegecosts plus lack of monetary. See, they need jobs to pay for college, but without college, thechances at a good paying job are slim. And so, some never see the end of
In their essays, both Caroline Bird and Robin Wilson express a concern about the rising cost of college tuition. Bird argues that the cost of college makes it a poor investment, while Wilson argues that college is worth the investment. In Bird’s essay, “College Is a Waste of Time and Money” she argues that college is not worth the investment because going to college does not necessarily result in earning a higher income. She claims that college is structured in a way that attracts people who are already “slated to earn more money,” similar to those who come from wealthy backgrounds, and those with higher IQs (Bird 376). Bird also claims that someone from a lower status family who has the same education, occupation, and test scores will earn