The Passionate Pilgrim

1394 Words3 Pages

In choosing to undergo a feminist reading of William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 144 (The Passionate Pilgrim, 1599), I have found that Shakespeare not only seeks to present womankind in a dark light but also endeavours to blame woman for his own ills. The sombre tone of the poem heightens this interpretation, and his piece is littered with phrases and imagery reflecting the conflict between light and dark, good and evil, which in turn emphasises his metaphor of having angels either side of him, acting as his moral compass. The narrator of the poem, which is taken to be Shakespeare himself, explicitly dooms the female character of his sonnet within the first quatrain, labelling her a “worser spirit”, contrasting the “better angel” he names ‘man’ to be. It is only in the third and fourth lines that we discover which are claimed to be the angels of “comfort” or “despair” as this is unclear in the opening line. This is due to Shakespeare referring to both angels as “loves”, hinting at an infatuation with both the good and the bad of his own psyche. Shakespeare’s clear affection for both these parts inspires the idea that one perhaps cannot exist without the other; that the good can always be found through the bad, and the bad can be found lurking, creating shadows on the good, much like the Chinese …show more content…

Shakespeare uses constant holy and religious vocabulary to describe his male lover, naming him an “angel” in lines three, six, nine, and twelve, as well as a “saint” in line seven. This infatuation with the male is contrasted to the heterosexual norm, said to not only be natural, but the ‘holy path’ due to the Christian society of which Shakespeare was a part. However, Shakespeare’s presentation of this norm is warped by his use of “hell, my female evil”, “corrupt”, and “bad angel” to describe his relationship with the

Open Document