The Most Dangerous Game Analysis

805 Words2 Pages

Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” (or “The Hounds of Zaroff” if you want to be different) is one of the most popular and famous short stories written in English. Teachers love it because it has got a classic short story structure and lots of great irony. And, students also love it because it is super creepy and weird. “The Most Dangerous Game” as first appeared in Collier’s magazine in January 19, 1924. It is worth reading even today and people love it. This story even won the O. Henry Prize which is a short story award that's still given out today.
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, a man whose name is Sanger Rainsford faces a disagreement which is based on what he thinks about a deserted island. This island was totally unpopulated except the one man who lives there, General Zaroff. General Zaroff loves to hunt but he hunts not only animals but human beings. Actually, General Zaroff got tired of hunting just animals as he claims that it was too easy for him since he was such an excellent hunter. He wanted more than that and wanted to make the hunting a challenge. Rainsford comes to know that General Zaroff has hunted humans before, therefore he is a murderer. A critic has reviewed, “Ironically, General Zaroff’s belief in his invincibility weakens him and causes his defeat.” I agree with this critic several reasons.
Well, it is good to be clever and fearless when somebody is stuck in a bad situation. It can help that person get out of it as soon as he can. However, I believe that having too much courage in these situations is not good at all and is not helpful as well. When you think you are invulnerable in scary situations, this can weaken you and can make you lose the battle. This is the reason why I agree...

... middle of paper ...

...Splendid! One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford."
He had never slept in a better bed, Rainsford decided.
This last sentence, coming after the swordfight which elevated Rainsford from a "beast at bay," Rainsford finds himself the victor,and now one who obviously has tolerated cold-blooded murder" that he contempt at the dinner table with Zaroff on his first night.
So, at the end, Sanger Rainsford changes his opinions about hunting. He alters himself for the feelings of the prey and sympathizes later on, knowing how it feels to be a "beast at bay" as he himself is hunted. Also, he abandons his rejection of Zaroff's "cold-blooded murder" of men and commits a cold-blooded act of murder himself. Rainsford has come to know the pain of the animals he used to hunt and finally he changed.

Open Document