World War II was, quite simply, the most deadly and destructive conflict in human history. In fact, E.B. "Sledgehammer" Sledge, a renowned U.S. Marine who fought on the Pacific Front during the war, gave a first account of the atrocities he experienced in his 1981 memoir, “With the Old Breed: At Peleliu and Okinawa.” He said, "It was so savage. We were savages. We had all become hardened. We were out there, human beings, the most highly developed form of life on earth, fighting each other like wild animals” (Sledge). Why, then, is World War II referred to as "The Good War" and why is it still significant today (Terkel 387)? Regardless of the pulverization, demise, and decimation, the war helped introduce a new world, one in which Hitler's Third Reich in Europe was nonexistent. Such a world was advocated by the peacemakers of the post World War II era. On June 5, 1947. The US Secretary, George Marshall, made public the United States government’s decision to aid in the political and economic restoration of Europe (Marshall).
Little did he know, this twelve-minute speech managed to change the course of history and the fate of a devastated Europe after World War II. This led to the implementation of the Marshall Plan, otherwise known as the “European Recovery Program”, and the Truman Doctrine. Not only did they revolutionize the European economy, but they were able to bring about political change by containing the spread of communism. Both programs also provided a transition into the creation of new political institutions like NATO and the European Community of Steel and Coal. The Second World War likewise denoted the start of the end of world colonialism as patriot developments started to triumph over debilitated pioneer domai...
... middle of paper ...
...
Marshall, George C. Cold War Reference Library. Ed. Richard C. Hanes, Sharon M. Hanes, and Lawrence W. Baker. Vol. 5: Primary Sources. Detroit: UXL, 2004. 43-51. World History in Context. Web. 2 Apr. 2014.
Neumann, William L. After Victory: Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin and the Making of the Peace. New York: Harper & Row, 1967. Print.
Perry, Mark. Partners in Command: George Marshall and Dwight Eisenhower in War and Peace. New York: Penguin, 2007. Print.
Sledge, E. B. World War II Reference Library. Ed. Barbara C. Bigelow, et al. Vol. 4: Primary Sources. Detroit: UXL, 2000. 197-209. World History in Context. Web. 2 Apr. 2014.
Terkel, Studs. "The Good War": An Oral History of World War Two. New York: Pantheon, 1984. Print.
Wexler, Imanuel. The Marshall Plan Revisited: The European Recovery Program in Economic Perspective. Westport, Conn., 1983.
Crockatt, Richard. The fifty years war : the United States and the Soviet Union in world politics, 1941-1991. London; New York; Routledge, 1995.
Horne, C., 2014. Source Records of the Great War. 3rd ed. Lewiston, New York: E. Mellen Press.
In the United States, the Second World War was considered “the good war”. It’s sort of weird that World War II was considered a “good war” considering that this war took five times as many lives than the very first World War and is also appalling to know that one of the bloodiest wars in history was known in the United States as “the good war”, but the reason for this classification is because of the role that the U.S. played in bringing an end to the fascist dictatorship in Italy, bring an end to the aggression of the Japanese, and last but not least the Allied Forces put an end to Hitler’s Nazi Regime, and prevented the Third Reich from taking over Europe. The war even marked the start of something new by guiding a new world order, thus putting
Isaacs J (2008). ‘Cold War: For Forty-five Years the World Held its Breath’. Published by Abacus, 2008.
Jeffries, John. Wartime America: The World War II Home Front. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1996. Print. American Way.
Barnett, Correlli. World War II: Persuading the People. Orbis Publishing Limited, 1972. Pgs. 76 -- 102.
Gaddis, John Lewis. “We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History.” Taking Sides: Clashing Views On Controversial Issues in United States History. Ed. Larry Madaras and James M. SoRelle. 14th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 302-308.
Hammond, Thomas, Editor. Witnesses to the Origins of the Cold War. University of Washington Press. Seattle, 1982.
O'Neill, William L. World War II: A Student Companion. New York: Oxford UP, 1999. Print.
Glynn, Patrick. Closing Pandora's Box "Arms Races, Arms Control, and the History of the Cold War". New York: HarperCollinsPublishers, Inc. 1992.
However, when confronted with a strict policy of appeasement, by both the French and the English, the stage was set for a second World War. Taylor constructs a powerful and effective argument by expelling certain dogmas that painted Hitler as a madman, and by evaluating historical events as a body of actions and reactions, disagreeing with the common idea that the Axis had a specific program from the start. The book begins with the conclusion of the First World War, by exploring the idea that critical mistakes made then made a second war likely, yet not inevitable. Taylor points out that although Germany was defeated on the Western front, “Russia fell out of Europe and ceased to exist, for the time being, as a Great Power. The constellation of Europe was profoundly changed—and to Germany’s advantage.”
C. Peter Chen, . "Iwane Matsui." World War II Database. Lava Development. Web. 8 Mar 2014.
The. April 23, 2004.http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/worldwars/wwtwo/ww2_summary_01.shtml (accessed March 30, 2011).
Smith, William Y and Anatoli I. Gribkov. Operation ANADYR: U.S. and Soviet Generals Recount the Cuban Missile Crisis. Chicago: Edition Q, 1994.
...E. The Cold War: The United States and the Soviet Union, 1917-1991. New York: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.