Kardashian Case Study

1094 Words3 Pages

The Kardashian Brand: A Study in Beauty Standards and Gender Performance
How do we standardize female beauty? How do beauty standards differ globally? Can society function without beauty standards? Before we can answer these questions, the first thing we must understand is what beauty standards are. Essentially, beauty standards represent an “immutable essence” of femininity (Beauvoir, 279). What is femininity? It is a hypothetical criterion that one must observe to be considered a woman. At least, that is what it is alleged to be. The true question that we must ask ourselves is if femininity exists at all. According to Judith Butler, a contemporary feminist advocate, femininity is “a kind of imitation for which there is no original” (Butler). …show more content…

Society encourages extensive insights as to how a woman should appear, not only physically but also manneristically; women are taught from a young age that promiscuity is unacceptable, while prudishness is undesirable. These arbitrary beauty ideals establish women as, “the other, the inessential, the object” because they aim to please men, who operate as “the subject” (Beauvoir, 7). The self-created Kardashian Brand is very telling in regards to how we standardize beauty, as the Kardashians function as both an idol that women emulate and an object that men desire; it is women’s admiration and the men’s lust that fuels the massive Kardashian monopoly. The Kardashians maintain media prevalence by tailoring their gender performance to the evolution of these notions and thus, the monopoly prospers. When Kim Kardashian exercises, she wears excessive makeup and has polished hair, verifying her vigilance in being, “really careful about how [she is] perceived” (Kim Kardashian, Keeping Up with the Kardashians, S1:E4). This manipulation proves that gender is a not factual construct and the dual nature of how the Kardashians are perceived confirms that gender is open to interpretation, in turn substantiating gender as an act. Because the Kardashians have perfected a formula that allows them to …show more content…

The human experience is characterized by making comparisons to what is believed to be standard and gender roles perpetuate the notion that there is something uniform in each member of a certain sex. Gender is everywhere. Even something as simple as a razor, an item used universally, experiences gender categorization. Society does not know how to function without incessantly promoting the “binarism of sex” and the Kardashians have capitalized on this “fundamental unnaturalness” by making a line of products, including a clothing line and a perfume brand, which targets female gender performance and sexuality (Butler, Gender Trouble, 190). Does their exploitation of gender make them immoral? It is up to personal interpretation whether or not the Kardashian philosophy is corrupt, however, it is undeniable that exploitation for commercial gain is a traditionally male action. ‘Masculine’ tactics produce a lucrative brand and the hyper-sexualized Kardashians take on feminist agency; Butler’s notion of the world being “produced through the constituting acts of subjective experience” is unquestionably demonstrated (Performance Acts and Gender Construction, 522). The Kardashian ability to take gender expression to a degree where it virtually becomes a parody and to successively make a fortune by exploiting gender roles proves that character and intellect do not

Open Document