Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of fake news
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of fake news
Lately all we hear about is fake news this, fake news that; this has us constantly be on our toes about whether or not the news article we’re even reading is real. In a world where we are more connected than ever, it’s very hard to not share new information; but in light of the recent election there’s started to be a rise of fake news on various social media outlets. The thing is that a lot of people have a hard time telling real news from fake news apart and when someone reads a fake article and shares it. It can cause major problems because these articles have a tendency of spreading like wildfire. What we don’t realize is that this concept of fake news has been around for a very long time. Adrian Chen highlights this in his article The Fake-News …show more content…
In order to prove this, he appeals to logic by providing examples of these situations. For instance, in the beginning of the article he talks about how in 1983 Orson Welles made a radio adaptation of The War of the Worlds and the following day newspapers were reporting that there was mass hysteria from people having heart attacks from the shock to civilians rushing into police stations to report what was going on; but in reality, “there was no mass hysteria, only small pockets of concern that quickly burned out.” (Chen) He uses actual scenarios that happened in our history to back up that fake news has been around and sometimes the ones that have actually partaken in spreading fake news themselves are one of the most trusted outlets for news, newspapers. He also uses this to kind of address the fact that fake news can also be an exaggeration of the truth and not just something that’s completely made up. Chen also highlights the fact that because we’re living in such a technologically connected society that it helps pave way for fake news going viral. Adrian Chen states, “The ‘share’ button sends lies flying around the Web faster than fact checkers can de- bunk them.” Not just does this talk about how things can be shared at a faster rate than before it introduces the reader to the fact that even though there are new soft wares trying to create new and innovative ways of making sure the article is real still can’t perform at the rate that fake news articles are being input into the
In his essay, “The Good, The Bad, and The Daily Show,” Jason Zinser explores the vices and virtues of so-called “fake” news programs. “Fake” news, as Zinser explains, are those programs that blend newsworthy events with comedy. By examining The Daily Show, Zinser reveals both positive and negative impacts that “fake” news could have on society. As a result, Zinser concludes that there are benefits as well as potential problems with “fake” news programs but insists that the true challenge is determining the net impact on society. The essay, which first appeared in The Daily Show and Philosophy: Moments of Zen and the Art of Fake News in 2007, challenges experts on both sides of the argument who either claim fake news is for entertainment only or that fake news is an acceptable source for information on current events. On one hand, Zinser uses expert testimonies to support his argument that the end result is a better informed public but on the other, he makes logical arguments enhanced by examples to illustrate the potential impacts “fake” news can have on its viewers and mainstream media.
Rumor says that Katelyn jenner died by assassination. That is an example of how news reporters get your attention. They do this because they want you to think that so it grabs your attention. All they want you to think is that he/she died which is a devastation but, he really didn’t. All these false reports you see on the cover of magazines aren't always accurate. It is important to grasp your attention because if they don’t they won’t get money. They won't get money because you pay for your newspaper and, if no one buys it the one who wrote it is broke. So basicly what i am trying to say is news reporters makeup slight lies to grab your attention. So they aren’t always reliable.
The web is a quick way to spread information which, if false, can have di...
An example from “60 minutes” is “Bots”. “Bots” is a program where you pay a price and multiple fake social media accounts will be created. These accounts will not only read the articles, but also share, like, and retweet the posts. As a result of this the articles will become more popular and people will be more interested in reading them due to its popularity. As a matter of fact, it was “Bots” that made the article about Clinton’s health go viral. As a conclusion “Fake news” relates to the world of 1984 because the separation of the powers are similar in today's world and in 1984. “Fake news” make the people aware of the actions that take place and make them aware of the decisions that are being made, which might have negative consequences. The reason to why the president does not like “Fake news” is because the reality is no longer hidden from the
They claim that since something is able to on these feeds, it must be valid, otherwise it wouldn’t have permission to be posted. When referring back to people blindly trusting the media because they have no other outlets, the same idea could apply here. The truth is, though, untrue things ARE able to be broadcasted on the Internet or television. The web is essentially an open forum for anyone to say anything, so it is advised that only websites ending in ‘.gov’, ‘.org’, or ‘.edu’ can be fully trusted. Television, however, is a different story. In an online article, Cynthia McKinney explained that while the American media does have a problem with omitting, misinforming, filtering, and over-exaggerating it’s information, it has the legal right to do so. “Courts in the US have ruled on many occasions that freedom of speech also includes the freedom to lie,” McKinney stated. She went on to discuss that some lies aren’t protected by the constitution, like lying under oath or being untruthful to sell a product. Later in the article, she refers to a documentary that she watched where two reporters went in to work for Fox News. After being told several times to lie, the reporters were told by executives of the network that, “The news is what we say it is.” McKinney ends her article by saying it wasn’t a surprise to her that more and more, people are turning to alternative news outlets for more accurate information. Touching back on the executive’s quotes, “The news is what we say it is,” one may notice just how similar it sounds to the Party in 1984 - “‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past” (44). This quote is explaining the theory of doublethink, a way of reality control enforced by the Party. Apparently, 1984 and the Fox News Channel are very similar in the thought that they hold ultimate control over the
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
The falsity must have stronger ramifications than an angry woman whose name was misspelled. In school and training, journalists are taught to be as fair, accurate and balanced as possible. But today’s media spear has new things being introduced every day, such as the emergence of satire sites such as the Onion. SECOND:
He claims that fake news allows us to appreciate “good quality accurate news” and causes people to become “more skeptical of what we’re told” in his article “Two Reasons Fake News Is Good for Society.” However, his argument is invalid in the sense that inaccurate news does more harm than good, for instance, the A Dog’s Purpose incident and the pizzeria shooting. McGregor seems to be trying to get society to perceive the pros that can be taken away from fake news. Additionally, there are a few cases in which fake news can positively influence the mass, such as when it was used as propaganda during World War I and II. The British government subsidized the Overseas News Agency (ONA) to “feed manufactured stories, often couched within factual material, about German atrocities...and Hitler’s threats against the Americas, to its New Jersey Radio Station, which tagged them with the news agency label.” The British’s intention was to turn the American “population against Germany” so the U.S. would join the war and side with the British. As months progressed, the United States eventually did join the war. This demonstrates that fake news can have a positive impact on the mass. However, this could have not gone as planned and could have upset the Germans even more, making matters
Social media is a revolutionary way to connect with friends and family through a single app, much like Facebook. Also allowing the public to be more informed on current events, whether that is an issue in today’s society, all the way to a heartwarming story or a funny video. This sounds amazing and the fact that this type of news outlet is practically new. An issue arises that involves “fake news” and with that comes many opinions on what to do about it. I believe that people browsing these platforms should have a little bit of skepticism behind each story and if the topic truly intrigues someone then they should look into the topic on a reliable resource before passing on the authors misinformation.
They do not, in general, fabricate the facts. What they do, rather, is to report them from within the dominant perspectives on the social realities of the day.' (1988, p. 11) Fowler (1996, p. 2) also points out that news, in a capitalist society, usually agrees with the ideology of the controlling groups as news is an industry that has its own commercial interests at heart, and far from neutrally reflecting social reality actually promote the "social construction of reality.
Naturally, journalism would spill over to the Internet and as social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook grew in popularity, so did regular citizens involvement with sharing news. The argument can be made that the explosion of social media journalism was due to frustration from the lack of coverage of news that mattered to society. For example, the lack of subjective coverage of Michael Brown 's death helped with the creation of #BlackLivesMatter and spread of news related to African-American’s and other minorities across the country. After all, journalism is supposed to be a public forum. Millions of people on Twitter share their thoughts and opinions on several topics, furthering the conversation and to some degree challenging society. Things such as “Moments” on Twitter provide us with direct links and summaries to the world’s most important stories and encourage a conversation. According to journalism.org, 63% of users on Twitter and Facebook get their news from these websites. Even more eye opening is that 59% of users on Twitter keep up to date with news stories via Twitter while they are in the process of happening.[3] The rise of social media related journalism has caused some issues however. “Inevitably, as citizen involvement grows, more of our media culture is concerned with talking about news, instead of focusing on original reporting and the vetting of it.”[4] Because the general public has the ability to post as they wish and pass it off as news, it has affected the accuracy of many reports. Many stories lack reputable sources but are shared between millions as an accurate and true story. There are several websites designed to spread inaccurate information. The website www.fakenewswatch.com exists to inform people of these sites in order to avoid mishaps. Recently a Connecticut mom went viral for being involved in an online hoax
The presence of social media is a large contributing factor in the release of fake
From the beginning days of the printing press to the always evolving internet of present day, the media has greatly evolved and changed over the years. No one can possibly overstate the influential power of the new media of television on the rest of the industry. Television continues to influence the media, which recently an era of comedic television shows that specialize in providing “fake news” has captivated. The groundbreaking The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and its spin-off The Colbert Report have successfully attracted the youth demographic and have become the new era’s leading political news source. By parodying news companies and satirizing the government, “fake news” has affected the media, the government, and its audience in such a way that Bill Moyers has claimed “you simply can’t understand American politics in the new millennium without The Daily Show,” that started it all (PBS).
Social media is a quick and easy way to spread news and information across the world. However, the common saying, “you can’t believe everything you see on the internet,” is true. Social media allows the spread of unreliable and false information. A study done by the American Press Institute found, “64% of people who use Twitter for news say that they have encountered something they "later discovered wasn't true," and 16% of Twitter news users say that "they had retweeted or posted a tweet they later discovered to be false” (API). This can have various effects as people are falsely educated which can lead to some bad or unnecessary decisions.
...stence depends upon continued success in furnishing readers and listeners with a wide range of facts,” said reporter Julian Adams. By the public depending on media for information, they are making the media money. Buying newspapers and magazines are compensating those companies. Listening to your local radio station and watching your local news channel is compensating those companies. “Staging (fabrication) or deliberate distortion of news is against public interest,” said writer William B. Ray. Society believes in media and the media believes in the society. So let the society know the real data and what’s important. Knowing what’s important captures the public’s interest rather than knowing what’s fake. Falsifying News is legal meaning the media is allowed to lie to the public. Everyone has their own views on this topic but either way lying to the society is wrong.