The Innocent, The Guilty And Controverss In Arthur Miller's The Crucible

728 Words2 Pages

The Innocent, the Guilty, and the Deceivers
At one point in time, it was socially acceptable to accuse someone of a crime of act of social intolerance, without evidence for any selfish need desirable. McCarthyism began, and ended in the 1950s, in which people practiced events of accusing people for selfish motives; the phenomenon lead by the senate Joseph McCarthy. No one dared to speak against him, because if they did they were suspiciously silenced. An event that corresponds McCarthyism previously happened in the 17th century in American history. The Salem Witch Trials depicted in Arthur Miller’s The Crucible parallel McCarthyism and the Red Scare in the 1950s because of seizing of personal belongings, paranoid accusations, and the individuals …show more content…

McCarthy as a senator was someone who was in danger of losing his position as a government official. So to save himself, “He went to Wheeling, West Virginia […] and made a speech in which he waved a piece of paper from the Federal Bureau of Investigation” and McCarthy decided to make a wild claim that a piece of paper contained the names “of 205 so-called card-carrying communists still working for the U.S State Department.” As expected, he was “challenged to produce proof, (and) failed to do so” (Wilson 2).¬This correlates to the courthouse scene, in which the proctor hands a paper to Danforth, to “Declare their good opinion of Rebecca, and (Proctors) Wife, and Martha Correy.” And John Proctor has little evidence, he tries to say “These are all landholding farmers, members of church” to make his claims sound better. (Miller 87). The similarities between these quotes is to present that John Proctor and McCarthy had to save themselves, and their loved ones. Since Joseph McCarthy did not care about anyone else, or how people would react, he manipulated the fear of the red scare to favor him; so he could save his position as government by saying that the U.S government had people in office that were communistic. In which people reacted negatively, and people were more likely to side with McCarthy. Proctor did something similar by creating a paper that just said things without proof that could be validated; John Proctor just made people sign a sheet saying that people should believe his family and himself were good people. Since he had no way of getting proof he was a good person, and McCarthy as well did not have a way to obtain credibility, their original intentions were not met, because they both thought that their word was enough to save

Open Document