More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay young people are the least likely to vote
Consequences of lowering the voting age
Youth is important to vote
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay young people are the least likely to vote
Voting in the United States of America has a low percentage of eligable voters participating. Lowering the age is a great way to get more people invovled as well as promoting voting to the older population. lowering the age and making it easier to vote will increase the eligible voters pertcentage.
Lowering the voting age to 16 will allow for a higher voting percenting from the younger audiance. Young children learn more about todays politics from government classes to know who they want to vote for. The first passage it states that only 38% of voters from the age 18 - 24 voted bringing the age down to 16 - 24 will have a much higher voting percentage; and as well as decreasing the age limit teaching the younger groups how to get involved
Considering the delegates that are currently running for office, a voter should have a vast level of understanding regarding the intentions of each and every candidate. Arguing whether to raise or lower the age limit for the right to vote has raised many speculations as to how it would affect the economy. There are pros and cons within both sides of the argument, but any decisions made by the powers that be will have an adverse effect on today’s society if it is placed in the hands of the younger generation. Therefore, raising the voting age to twenty-one is a better way of making sure that voters are more aware and would be more equipped to making a more sound decision rather than lowering
Since the 1890s, Canada’s voter turn-out has declined steadily, however, the decline in voter turn-out in the last several elections is one of great concern to Canada’s democracy. As a result, mandatory voting has gained the attention of many political scientists and political analysts. While there are good reasons to worry about Canadians’ diminishing voter turn-out, it is also fair to say that mandatory voting will not prove beneficial to the future of Canada’s democracy. Although mandatory voting will increase the voter turn-out, it will not create an informed voter base and neither raise a more politically knowledgeable society. Making voting compulsory is accompanied by both positive and negative outcomes, but in Canada, many fear that the negative outcomes outweigh the positives.
It will take great strides to create a system in which American citizens will be represented in the political process, and only then will young Americans be truly compelled to vote. One way to achieve this goal is through the adoption of a system of proportional representation. This paired with the implementation of Internet voting, increased voter education, and same day voting will ensure a rise in voter turnouts and youth participation in government.
In my opinion it is significantly important to vote. Voting is equivalent to expressing your opinion in class or even bout the political reviews. This year we had two outstanding nominee's Donald Trump and Hilary Clinton. Donald Trump is part of the Republican Party. Hillary Clinton is part of the Democratic Party. However, there are difference between the two party's.
If the voting age is lowered, it is true that a higher voter turnout would be a result. Other countries such as Belgium, Germany, and Austria have a lower voting age and enjoy a higher percentage of voter turnout. Belgium ranks at 93% voter participation, while the U.S. trails behind at just 38% turnout in congressional elections. These facts seem to indicate that a lower voting age has a direct impact on voter participation. However, there is no concrete proof that a lower voting age directly impacts voter turnout. I believe the problem lies deeper than age.
The articles have shared some light on the topic “Does our Voting System Need to be fixed?” In these two articles by both man have to very different point of views which make one really think a more about it. The arguments they made based on the voting system where very much concerning issues and should be examined further throughout this paper.
... equal system. The lower age could also encourage and interest youth much more in political processes and parties as now they would actually be able to impact the way they are governed and who is governing them. Politics would be much more noticeable in schools and the general knowledge of politics and the political process would drastically increase. The youth would also be more likely to develop earlier the skills and potentials needed in later life politically and even socially. In conclusion when all is said and done I, personally would like to say the voting age lowered to sixteen for many of the reasons above. There will be many people opposing this movement but I think it is time for the youth of Canada to be heard and if they wish they should have the opportunity to vote and express their opinions and choices.
Today in America, less than half of young voters between the ages of 18 and 24 vote (TheBestColleges.org). What most of these new adults fail to realize, is that their government depends on them to vote and elect new leaders to represent their country. Many of them make excuses to avoid voting, when really, they benefit most from voting.
During the year of 1870, on the 3rd day in the month of February, the 15th amendment was ratified. The 15th amendment prohibits the denial of the right to vote based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Basically, giving all United States citizens the equal right to vote. Thousands of brave men and women have made the ultimate sacrifice to defend the United States constitution that holds our rights. Not to mention all the hard work from several people it took to pass congress. So why not make voting mandatory? Mandatory voting will benefit the United States citizens by allowing everyone to exercise their rights, therefore, entitling us to have a say in the electoral process, possibly making a change to improve our country.
Many people think of the 206 million eligible voters in the United States and think, “How could one vote possibly make a difference?” Or perhaps some find themselves too busy, while other non-voters are simply uninterested in politics. With a combination of all excuses, about 75 million people that were eligible to vote in the 2008 presidential election chose not to. That’s 75 million unheard voices! 75 million unrepresented individuals make up approximately 36% of all eligible voters. That number of people could easily change the outcome of an election. When put in perspective and fully understood, it’s realized just how important it is for every eligible voter to vote, and do so responsibly. The significance of voting is commonly misunderstood. Voting determines things from the president of the United States, to a small town mayor, to representatives, which all in turn determine everything from war, to taxes, to a child’s education. This country was politically formed into something previously unknown to the world, and with citizenship to this great country and democracy, comes great responsibility. It is a right as U.S. citizens to choose to vote or not; however, it is a duty and obligation to do so, for the sake of those who have fought, for friends and family, and for this country as a whole.
Voting, a right many people have fought and struggled for, but sadly far too few people vote. According to the 2008 US Census Bureau, only 63% of all people registered to vote did. That looks good because over 50% voted but that's not until you find out that only 72% of America registered to vote. That means that the other 28% sat at home doing their own business when their country was deciding who would be their new leader for the next 4 years. Truthfully, only 45% of Americans are even voting, even though they could change the whole country for the better or for the worse. There were wide gaps betweens the amount that can vote and those who do it. People who reach the requirements are able to vote yet only 45% - 50% vote. For 30 years, voters
The president is in charged of the government, they have to do whatever he said if not they will be in big trouble, so if he saids he wants them to start a war they will start a war, no matter how stooped a president would be if he said that.
In “You’re 16, You’re Beautiful and You’re a Voter,” author Anya Kamenetz states her belief that the voting age should be lowered to sixteen. Kamenetz gives several premises to her argument.
Based on the statistics, it is implied that even at a legal age, these young adults are not even interested in voting, so why would the voting age limit be decreased? It is not related to the voting percentage at all because there are other things to give focus more. In the second article, although the elderly can influence the voter turnout more based on percentage, if the government can influence more of the young adults to vote, then there would be more voters. The voter turnout is not the focus here, rather how can each and everyone be made to vote. The age limit must not be moved simply because the government should focus more on two things: educating the young people with their power to vote and making voting for other people
In contemporary society, people are less aware and inquisitive of the world they live in. Within our nation, people are oblivious to the hardships other nations face and the effects of those hardships on our nation. In response to this, some have argued that voting should be a privilege earned through serving the country for twenty-four months. Although voting is a privilege that should be earned, confining voting to only those who serve would infringe people’s unalienable voting right and would lead to an unfair disadvantage to a proportion of the population.