The Impact Of The Meiji Restoration In Japan

953 Words2 Pages

In 1603, the Japanese feared that western economics and religious influences, which could corrupt their traditions. They banned all foreign contact and meted out severe punishments. They also decided to outlaw christianity. The decision to isolate was made by Tokugawa Shogunate, since that period Japan was ruled by shoguns which were hereditary leaders. The Meiji restoration did constitute a revolution in Japan.
Emperor Meiji had the intent to restore direct imperial rule. No part of Japan was left unchanged many people found the changes to be unnecessary and did not agree with them. Meiji did a full Japanese take over, changing everything about the country. This can be more than considered to be unfair to anyone who would have to follow …show more content…

Some were farmers others were samurai. This conscription stated that all men had to serve three years and be a reserve for four years. This angered many citizens because they had to give up their everyday lives to be warriors. It was also considered to be upsetting due to most of the farmers being trained to fight, so the food that is being grown is not as quality as it was before Meiji came into power. Everyone’s life got flipped upside down due to the Meiji restoration. The Meiji restoration did constitute a revolution in Japan. The Meiji restoration was a turning point in Japan the samurai had pay cuts and their social privileges, they tried to invest companies but failed in the end. Some started to join political movements others took a stand.the government drafted non soldiers and threw them into training. Farmers were stripped from their families to be put on the front lines. Meiji wanted to completely leave the past of Japan behind and reshape it into a new country. It didn 't work. Due to the poor conditions the citizens were left in, they …show more content…

Japanese societies were gradually modified by economic change. The Meiji restoration had no effect on the revolution in Japan. The manifestation in a number of phenomenon for the traditional order had no place: samurai whose debts turned them into ambitious office-holders or impoverished umbrella-maker; farmers abandoning subsistence agriculture to become commercial producers and rural entrepreneurs or laborer and quasi-tenants and city merchants enjoying feudal patronage in a kind symbiosis with authority or escaping into an urban subculture of their own.
The country’s social and political institutions proved to be remarkably durable: eroded but far from demolished. They did not seem in 1850 to be on the point of being swept away. Not least, this was because the system of in institutional checks and balances coupled with deliberate regional fragmentation that had been devised to restrain the anticipated disaffection of samurai and feudal lords proved capable also of imposing controls on the new men of substance who might have challenged established order from outside the samurai class. Most of these men sought their opportunities of advancement through conformity, not revolution, accuring status by purchase or marriage while remaining politically

Open Document