The Immoral Practice of AIG
In the fiscal year of 2008 one of the largest insurance companies was faced with having to file chapter 11 bankruptcy. This company was American International Group which will be referred to as AIG. To avoid economic failure American International Group turned to the government to seek financial assistance. Since the magnitude of AIG was so enormous the government felt that this company could not fail, because it would have a strong impact on the economy. A whopping 85 billion dollars was advances to the company to assist with their recovery plan. From there things made a turn for the worse due to the un-explanatory disbursement of the funds that was given to AIG. This has caused a massive effect on public relations that will be explained throughout this document.
Hiding Essential Information
It has been in general agreement amongst the public in regard to the ethics that have been violated surrounded by the AIG scandal. According to The Practice of Public Relations there’re six perquisites that a company should adopt in order to perform good public service. One of the first obligatory is Pro communication which has been abused in every measure (Seitel, 2007). With AIG attempting to withhold and conceal the bonuses that were disbursed of 165 million is clearly abuse. Considering the bailout was given by government of taxpayer’s money in order to avoid chapter 11 bankruptcies. There is no argument that the public should have been without a doubt known every dollar spent in their recovery (Postal, 2009). What can be argued were the bonuses necessary?
The accounting practice of AIG was morally wrong and goes against the key public relations principle of Ethics. This co...
... middle of paper ...
...needs to use its employees to rebuild trust. p. 16.
Cohan, W. D. (2010, April). Collaspe of the House of Hank. Institutional Investor Vol.44 , 40-84.
Diane, B., Marcia, V., & Mike, M. (2009, November 4). AIG WHAT WENT WRONG. Business Week , pp. 32-35.
Dictionary. (n.d.). Dictionary. Retrieved July 11, 2011, from dictionary.net: www.dictionary.net/bonus
Postal, A. D. (2009, March 23). AIG Reveals Beneficiaries Of Bailout Funds On Derivatives. National Underwriter , pp. 21-24.
Prinston University. (n.d.). WordNet. Retrieved July 11, 2010, from http://wordnet.princeton.edu/: http://wordnet.princeton.edu/
Reward Management Assoiates. (n.d.). Reward Management Assoiates. Retrieved July 11, 2010, from Reward Management: http://www.reward-management.com/Definitions.htm
Seitel, F. P. (2007). The Practice of Public Relations. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
...o turn their securities back into AIG and demand billions of dollars. AIG was faced with a problem and they had to start asking subsidiary insurance companies to liquidate their pension and insurance holdings so they could cover their losses. If this happened those customers would have received a fraction of the money due to them and would ensure a global crisis. Of all the people complaining about AIG, Goldman-Sachs was doing it the most frequently and the loudest. An audit of AIG showed that they had no liquidity to pay off the bulk of what they owed so the Federal government issued a bail out of $80 billion which later elevated to $200 billion. Goldman-Sachs received the largest percentage of that $200 billion and would have torched the entire country in order to get that money that felt they deserved; and the housing-market bubble was just at the beginning of it.
...ns and the company’s fair-value accounting resulting in restatements of merchant investments based on faulty numbers. Additional violations included Enron’s accounting for stock issued to SPE’s, inadequate disclosure of related party transactions, and conflicts of interest and their cost to stockholders. These violations of GAAP and GAAs standards ultimately lead to the demise of a once mighty company (Benston, The Quality of Corporate Financial Statements and Their Auditors before and after Enron). The importance of consistently keeping up with accounting principles and producing accurate numbers for a company’s are exemplified through Enron’s story. The company faced an unfortunate fate that could have easily been avoided through more efficient and effective management, proper accounting methods, and a higher standard of morals and ethics within the workplace.
Charles H. Keating Jr. has been the focus of criminal investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Internal Revenue Service, the Justice Department, The Securities and Exchange Commission, and the House Banking Committee for a six-year shadow of the nation’s biggest savings-and loan debacle. The federal government proclaims that he fraudulently managed California’s Lincoln Savings into its closure, and in the process profited for himself and his family an estimated thirty-four million dollars. Consequently, taxpayers may suffer a loss of two billion dollars. The federal government is suing Keating, his family and associates for one billion dollars.
Davidson, Stephen M. Still Broken: Understanding the U.S. Health Care System. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business, 2010. Print.
The overall view clarification of the issue illustrates the evolution of Enron’s innovations and fraud. The business records of the company financial economists and accountant’s uncovered considerable number information and incentive issues. The issues both complicate and potentially resolve the appraised valuation questions such as; earnings growth, stock splits, dividend changes, free cash flow limitations, share price-based compensation and hedging of market risks. The Enron Company contributed large sums of money to non-profit organizations for the purpose of acting on probable ethical issues before they become legal dilemmas. The company failed to inform its consumers of the business decisions made even though they had knowledge that the person at the other end of the business deal did not. The Enron Company filed a Chapter 11 to seek bankruptcy protection. The uncertainty of the company’s standings impacted the market’s confidence in...
As the turn of the 21st Century evolved, it appeared as if Adelphia Communications Corporation was on a direct path of success; unbeknownst to their investors and the public, they were in reality on a direct path of destruction instead. Unfortunately, Adelphia is not the first major company in the history of the United States’ business world to lose the trust of the American public, but it is certainly one of the most notable ones to do so. As the events surrounding the Adelphia scandal unfolded in full view of the public eye, a multitude of media outlets were there to broadcast the destruction and distrust to the masses leaving many wondering if the term “business ethics” was actually nothing more than just an oxymoron. Throughout this paper, we will discuss the events surrounding the rise and fall of the Adelphia Communications Corporation and identify two of the ethical problems associated with the scandal while applying them to the deontological framework and Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative.
Rather than being sticklers for following GAAP accounting principles and internal controls, this company took unethical behavior to a whole new level. They lied when the truth would have been easier to tell. It is almost as if they had no comprehension that the meaning of the word ethics is “the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group (professional ethics); the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation”, (Mirriam-Webster, 2011). To be ethical all one has to do is follow laws, rules, regulations and your own internal moral compass, all things this company seemed to know nothing about.
This paper discusses the role of ethics in corporate governance. I seek to show the application of moral and ethical principles in corporate governance. Ethics is a topic that has generated a lot of interest in the last decade especially after high profile scandals. The failures of prominent companies such as WorldCom, Enron, Merrill lynch and Martha Stewart portrays the lack of corporate ethics. The failure of such business has seen an increased pressure to incorporate ethics in corporate governance. The result of corporate scandals has been eroding investor and public confidence. The entire economic system has experienced some form of stress from loss of capital, a falling stock market and business failures.