Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Meaning and nature of psychology
Define psychology
Define psychology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The novella Turn of the Screw was written by Henry James and originally published in 1898. The story is a ghost tale, involving a Governess and two children. There is much debate as whether the Governess in this story is sane or insane. According to Oxford Dictionaries, insanity is a “state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, and social interaction” (Oxford Dictionaries). The Governess can be considered insane since she has disturbed perceptions, exhibits abnormal behavior, and has unnatural social interactions. The Governess is insane since her perception is impaired. Throughout the novel, the Governess claims that there are ghosts haunting her and the children. For example, while the Governess and Mrs. Grose are by the lake, …show more content…
One behavioral issue that highlights the Governess’s insanity is her constant obsession with the children. For example, while watching over Miles, she thinks to herself, “what, under my endless obsession, I had been impelled to listen for was some betrayal of his not being at rest” (James 61). This quote exemplifies the Governess’s abnormal paranoia as she stays up and listens to Miles because she crazily suspects him of working with the ghosts and being possessed by them. This idea manifests in her head because she believes that since the children were close to Peter Quint and Miss Jessel before, the ghosts must be back for the children. The Governess just assumes this of the children, despite evidence of the contrary as they are described as pure and beautiful children in the beginning of the story and always deny the presence of the ghosts. Furthermore, the Governess’s insanity and obsession with the children manifests itself into more physical occurrences. For example, she physically handles Flora when she “[grips the] little girl with a spasm” (James 41). The Governess cannot control her behavior and grabs Flora because she believes that Flora is lying about her knowledge about the ghosts. The Governess’s delusions cause her to be physical with Flora, even though she is supposed to be her caretaker. This physical action …show more content…
However, even though Miles yells this out, he cannot actually see any ghosts. This is supported by the fact that Miles asks, “Where?” in this same scene (James 86). Miles looks around but cannot see any evidence of a ghost. He only yells out Peter Quint’s name as a guess in response to the Governess’s questioning, since he knows the Governess has been seeing the ghosts. Also, grammatically, Miles is calling the Governess the devil and not Peter Quint. Miles calls the Governess the devil since he believes that she is corrupted by her insanity and that she is the real threat to him and everyone else in the story, not some imaginary ghosts. This sudden final outburst pushes Miles over the edge and allows him to express his true beliefs. Others may argue that the Governess’s obsession with the children is her just being a good and protective caretaker. While it is true that the Governess may be driven to protect the children, she is still insane as she takes her protectiveness too far. For example, she believes, “London will set [Flora] up,” as she decides to send Flora away (James 79). She separates the children due to her crazy idea that they are communicating with the ghosts. This can be seen as an unnecessary and excessive measure that the Governess takes, since there is no need for the
In conclusion, it is not the ghosts, as the governess suspected, that are corrupting the children, but the governess herself, through her continually worsening hysteria that is corrupting the children. Both Peter Quint and Miss Jessel are not real ghosts that have the peculiar habit of appearing before the governess and the governess alone but they are merely the signs of the fragmenting mental state of the governess.
As humans, we can’t help but to jump to conclusions, but the governess’s assumptions are too misguided and are taken too far without substantial proof. When she first arrives at Bly, she automatically infers that Ms. Grose, although not showing any hint of it, is relieved that the governess is there and simply “wish[es] not to show it” (7). This could be the case, or, as it would seem to any sane person, Ms. Grose could just be unmoved by the governess’s arrival. Her second assumption with Ms. Grose is when they agree on one thing and the governess assumes that “on every question [they should] be quite at one” (9). Some people can hope that a person may have similar ideas to them, but they wouldn’t expect to agree on everything all the time. People understand that we all have different views, but obviously the governess does not. Then, the governess goes on to guess that Miles got kicked out of school because “he’s an injury to others” (11). She has no specific proof that shows he was kicked out for any reason but she is quick to make the inference. She hasn’t talked to the school, the uncle, or even Miles himself to find out what happened, but instead goes along with her own imagination. She also makes many assumptions about the ghost when she hasn’t even been talking to them. She deduces the ghost of Peter Quint “was looking for Miles” but she only had a feeling to base that off of
When Peter Quint and Miss Jessel were alive, they destroyed the innocence of Flora and Miles as well. It is suggested many times throughout the book, that Miss Jessel, the former governess, and Peter Quint, the vallette, were having an affair. Because this novella was written in the Victorian Era, it was not proper to write about subjects such as sex or intimacy period; therefore it is unclear about what really happened. However, it is clear that the children witnessed this affair and corruptness between their governess and vallette because Henry James confirms it through this passage, “What it was most impossible to get rid of was the cruel idea that, whatever I had seen, Miles and Flora had seen more - things terrible and unguessable and that sprang from dreadful passages of intercourse in the past” (James, 76). Although the governess could not fix the innocence that had already been destroyed by the inappropriate affair between Miss Jessel and Peter Quint, she certainly tried her hardest to save what innocence was
The issue whether the governess was insane or not may never be solved. Not only because critics seem to be able to find as much evidence as possible to prove their arguments but also, the reliability of the account of the governess colors the whole story with great ambiguity. We are not certain of the state of mind of the governess when she wrote down the story and when she related the story to Douglas. However, as we closely examine the state of mind of the governess, her reliability does appear to be in question. Beidler provided two readings of The Turn of the Screw and in the second one he declared: ¡§the governess saw only what she wanted to see¡¨ (Beidler 9). She was so exhausted from her prolonged insomnia that she envisioned a story with ghosts for herself to fulfill her growth as a governess.
The governess sees a woman on the other side of the lake and jumps to the conclusion that Flora has seen her and is choosing to act like she didn’t. The child was playing with a boat and had her back turned to the lake. Why would she think that she had to have seen her? There is no proof and does not even ask the child if she saw anything. She automatically assumes it’s Miss Jessel, the previous governess who died and that she is after Flora. She tells her story to Mrs. Grose drawing her in more deeply into believing her crazy hallucinations and Mrs. Grose asks her if she is sure its Miss Jessel and the governess replies “Then ask Flora—she’s sure!” and then immediately comes back to say “no, for God’s sake don’t! She’ll say she isn’t—she’ll lie” ((James 30). She comes to the conclusion that the child will lie about it when there is no reason to suspect that she would. Again, this is her jumping to conclusions, because there is not any proof to say that the children have seen or know anything about the ghost’s. “Thus a very odd relationship develops between the governess and the children, for the more she loves them and pities them and desires to save them, the more she begins to suspect them of treachery, until at last she is convinced that they, in league with the ghosts, are ingeniously tormenting her’ (Bontly 726). “The ghosts appear, thus, when the governess is both aware of the corruption which threatens the children and convinced of her own power to preserve them untainted” (Aswell 53). It’s the governess fabricating all this up in her mind again so she can play the part of
with Mrs. Grose, she learns that they are ghosts and former employees of the Gentleman
In the book Turn of the Screw we see many interactions between spirits and humans. The Governess is the main character in the book who sees the apparitions. The introduction of these spirits into the lives of the children in the book brings about many changes. These changes for the most part had a negative impact on the children. Many people view these ghosts as demons due to their negative impacts on the children. The three most harmful consequences from the phantom's presence was Miles’s expulsion from school, Flora’s pond incident, and Miles’s death.
Vision: The Governess is unable to rely on her vision because when she first see’s Peter Quint she believes that he is just her imagination. Also, her vision makes her harm the children when she is trying to protect. She sees the children as the ghosts and tries to get rid of the ghost by beating them but she is harming the children when doing so.
In another conversation with Mrs. Grose, the governess rebukes a comment with “Won’t, if he has the chance, turn on me? Yes, I venture still to think it” (219). The governess is questioning the integrity of Miles, and the relationship they have together. Here is another instance of James leaving the characters to wrangle with ideas in their own heads. This can relate back to the ambiguity James uses. The governess's insecurity over her relationship with Miles elicits several subjects of contention in the book. The self doubt prominent in the Governess’s life is projected onto the reader, which reflects an eerie feeling on to content. With every close relationship being called into question, an ominous feeling is cast onto the tale that escalates how frightening scenes are. The themes of insecurity and trust can also play hand in hand. A lack of trust in Flora also exacerbated the insecurity of the Governess. The governess discusses a sighting by saying “Miss Jessel stood before us on the opposite bank exactly as she had stood the other time” (212). This is ignored by Flora, which is indicated by the Governess thinking “The revelation then of the manner in which Flora was affected startled me in truth” (212). With the children not admitting to sightings of the ghosts, the governess is just further driven into a realm of questioning and self doubt. Though James
The governess behaves in a rational manner and therefore could not be deemed insane by the widespread definition of sanity. As a sane person, the governess acts with rationality. Though she feels that the ghosts may
Grose and Flora first. The governess is taken aback by Flora’s beauty, calling her “ the most beautiful child [she] had ever seen,” (James 7). Then, Miles returns home from school two days later, along with a letter stating that he had been dismissed school for being “an injury” to other students. Off the bat, James reveals the Governess’s compassion for not only the children, but their uncle as well. This could establish the governess as an unreliable narrator, setting the tone for the reader to begin distrusting her perspective. Soon after, the governess sees the ghost, later identified as Peter Quint by Mrs. Grose, for the initial time. Hallucinations are one of the most known symptoms of schizophrenia. The governess keeps the meeting to herself, locking herself in her room to think whenever she can, “There were hours, from day to day--or at least there were moments, snatched even from clear duties--when I had to shut myself up to think,” (James 18). The Governess is withdrawing from friends, like Mrs. Grose and the children, and from social events, such as her clear duties, this is another symptom of
In the book, The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James, there are many different views on what is actually occurring. A woman was offered a job as the governess by the owner of a large estate. He told her that all she needed to do was to watch his niece and nephew and also take care of the estate. She took the job because she was enticed by the man and was eventually introduced to the others on the estate. Soon after she became acquainted with the others on the grounds, she started noticing strange situations transpiring. There is little mentioned by the others in the book to allow for a strong interpretation of the circumstances appearing to the governess which leads me to believe that she has a mental illness and shows multiple signs of
One of the most critically discussed works in twentieth-century American literature, The Turn of the Screw has inspired a variety of critical interpretations since its publication in 1898. Until 1934, the book was considered a traditional ghost story. Edmund Wilson, however, soon challenged that view with his assertions that The Turn of the Screw is a psychological study of the unstable governess whose visions of ghosts are merely delusions. Wilson’s essay initiated a critical debate concerning the interpretation of the novel, which continues even today (Poupard 313). Speculation considering the truth of the events occurring in The Turn of the Screw depends greatly on the reader’s assessment of the reliability of the governess as a narrator. According to the “apparitionist” reader, the ghosts are real, the governess is reliable and of sound mind, and the children are corrupted by the ghosts. The “hallucinationist”, on the other hand, would claim the ghosts are illusions of the governess, who is an unreliable narrator, and possibly insane, and the children are not debased by the ghosts (Poupard 314). The purpose of this essay is to explore the “hallucinationist” view in order to support the assertion that the governess is an unreliable narrator. By examining the manner in which she guesses the unseen from the seen, traces the implication of things, and judges the whole piece by the pattern and so arrives at her conclusions, I will demonstrate that the governess is an unreliable narrator. From the beginning of The Turn of the Screw, the reader quickly becomes aware that the governess has an active imagination. Her very first night at Bly, for example, “[t]here had been a moment when [she] believed [she] recognized, faint and far, the cry of a child; there had been another when [she] found [herself] just consciously starting as at the passage, before [her] door, of a light footstep.” The governess herself acknowledges her active imagination in an early conversation with Mrs. Grose, when she discloses “how rather easily carried away” she is. Her need for visions and fantasies soon lead her to believe that apparitions are appearing to her. It is from this point on that she begins to guess the unseen from the seen, trace the implication of things, and judge the whole piece by the pattern. After the first appearance of Peter Quint, the governess begins to make infe...
Mother asks, “Is there a ghost inside my child?” is a headline that is similar to how the novel The Turn of the Screw, by Henry James, is played out. Psychoanalytic criticism interprets the governess as being sane. This is because she is taking her job to the next level by acting like a mother toward the children. She is over-protecting Miles and Flora because she believes the ghosts of Quint and Miss Jessel are trying to get the children. The governess is also acting like this because she feels the need to over-protect the children because she never had a mother figure in her life.
In an attempt to make sense of the ambivalence within The Turn of the Screw it is vital to first illustrate such ambivalence within the text itself. The first example being whether or not the governess actually sees ghosts and if not are they are a mere figment of her imagination. Important to note here is the fact that the governess serves as both narrator and protagonist. This raises uncertainty as the ghosts are only visible to her throughout the text, therefore leaving us as readers with mixed feelings as to the credibility of the governess as a...