The Downfall of Oedipus

764 Words2 Pages

Sophocles life lasted from 497 BC-405 BC. Throughout his 92 years of being, he managed to write many tragic plays and one on his most famous ones is, Oedipus Rex. In, Oedipus Rex, he introduces to us Oedipus as king of Thebes only to end the play having this same king, as a blind beggar. His downfall is not linked to any other character in the play; so the only person to blame is Oedipus. Oedipus’s flaws resulted on having him end the play as a blinded beggar. Even though Oedipus is a victim of fate, his arrogance, attention to Thebe’s people and his search of certainty will be flaws leading to his tragic ending. His arrogance is one of the issues that ruined him. Throughout the play his anger and impatience are flagrant elements of his arrogance, and of his downfall. At the beginning of the play he wanted to end Laius’s murder as quickly as possible, to the point that he wanted to exile any person who knows anything about the case. “May he wear out his life / in misery to miserable doom”, this quote suggests his lack of patience as well as his anger to end this case hastily. Teiresias, a blind man, foreshadowed his fate at an early stage of the play, by accusing him of Laius’s death. At this stage his anger also clarifies the event in which Oedipus kills a passerby where three roads met. Later in the play, this passerby was revealed to be Laius, his own father. His attention to Thebe’s people is also another issue leading to his downfall. After being able to decipher the riddle of the sphinx before, he believed that he would be once again able to save his people from the plague, but he was mistaken since he was the cause. This proves that Oedipus’s main concerns was avenging Lauise’s death and hence end the plague. ... ... middle of paper ... ...nown who his real parents were, and as a result would have avoided this tragic ending. To refer back to Oedipus’s blindness, for him it was the only way to pay off for the sufferance people around him had to endure. For Oedipus, moral dilemma did not have much impact and he was in need of a physical handicap, which would be visible to all people who had to suffer because of his errors. His blindness is also partly due to his shame of having brothers and sisters which are in fact his daughters and sons out of incest. To conclude, fate played a minor role in his downfall, yet Oedipus’s acts were the major factors. Therefore, Oedipus’s own tragic ending is due to his arrogance, interest on Thebes’s people and search for truthfulness. The effect of these flaws was that he started the novel in a kingly manner to end it as a blind beggar, two extreme statuses.

Open Document