Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Failure of the Schlieffen Plan
Trench warfare ww1 essay
Failure of the Schlieffen Plan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Failure of the Schlieffen Plan
The Development of a Stalemate on the Western Front
When the war began in 1914, it was greeted largely with enthusiasm and
excitement. General public opinion was that it would be a quick war;
it was common to hear people saying it would be 'over by Christmas'.
However, when Christmas 1914 arrived, the war was far from over. In
fact, both sides had 'dug in' for winter, and there were no signs of
the quick and easy victory that each party had expected.
There are a number of reasons why stalemate developed on the Western
Front in October 1914, and none of these reasons could stand alone as
the main cause of the stalemate. There were many contributing factors,
overall playing a part in the failure of the Schlieffen Plan, which
had intended a quick victory for Germany, and definitely no stalemate.
Firstly, Germany had planned to invade France through neutral Belgium,
with the idea that Belgium would offer no resistance. However, Belgium
wasn't prepared to surrender quietly; the Belgian forces fought
heroically and, while Brussels still fell on the 20th of August, the
resistance offered by Belgium held up the Germans considerably. One of
the things the Belgians did was to flood large areas of their land,
which was very effective in delaying the German advance.
This contributed towards the stalemate in 1914 because the Germans
were working to a tight schedule; they needed to have defeated France
before Russia had mobilised, and they estimated that they had six
weeks in which to do this. Every part of the Schlieffen Plan needed to
run flawlessly in order for them to defeat the French in time to
return and fight Russia; even the slightes...
... middle of paper ...
...kilometres.
It was a stalemate. Both sides were dug into trenches protected by
machine guns, only metres apart in some places. Germany's Schlieffen
Plan had failed spectacularly. In conclusion, stalemate had a number
of causes; the resistance from Belgium and the involvement of the
British, which delayed Germany's attack; the quick mobilisation of the
Russian forces and the bad German supply lines which weakened
Germany's attack; the French defence of Paris, which diverted
Germany's attack; French losses in Plan XVII, without which France may
have been strong enough to defeat Germany; and the Battle of the
Marne, where both sides failed to defeat the other.
The public had been wrong, and the war was not over by Christmas. Both
sides had suffered great casualties and loss of forces, and trench
warfare had begun.
...did not exist.” However, when this information arrived the next morning, Haig told Rawlinson that “The enemy has undoubtedly been severely shaken and our correct course, therefore, is to press him hard with the least possible delay” . This military strategy was one which led, as Terraine argued, to long-term success. Primary source German Order of the Day from General Von Bulow on 3 July stated “the decisive issue of the war depends on… our victory on the Somme. We must win this battle…” . Furthermore, Haig’s strategy is shown to be perceptive and correct when we consider Ludendorff’s, German Chief of Staff, thoughts: “We were completely exhausted on the Western Front… If the war lasted our defeat seemed inevitable... I cannot see as I look back how the German G.H.Q. could have mastered the situation if the Allies had continued their blows as they did in 1916.”
The Battle of the Somme was one of the most famous battles that took place during World War One. Germany had believed that a war with Russia was likely to occur and if that happened then they would also come into attack from France. In order to avoid attack from both sides Germany planned to attack France first and then Russia, believing that Russia would need 6 weeks to attack them and they could defeat France in that time. This was the basis of the Schlieffen Plan. Germany attacked France through neutral Belgium as they thought that Belgium would not fight them. Germany launched a massive attack in the French city of Verdun in early 1916.This gave a real shock to France as they did not see it coming but, to lessen the pressure on France, the British planned an attack at Somme. The British wanted to break the German lines so that all the allies could continue the war into Germany.
Why The Stalemate on the Western Front Was Broken The Following Were Equally Important Reasons Why The Stalemate On The
Erich Maria Remarque wrote All Quiet on the Western Front in 1929 to advertise the horrors of World War I, the dangers of complete nationalism, and how any type of war can turn even the strongest soldier into an emotional and physical mess. With the novel being written in the early 20th century, the starting point of the World Wars, Remarque had the emotions of the public and Europe and American and the tip of her fingertips. The point of the novel was not to glorify war like previous war time novels had, rather it was to show the horror and the realistic negative aspects to war that the common person would not see. Remarque uses many different ways to portray the violence and horrible aspects of war, but one of the most visual is his description of destruction. This is not destruction of buildings or human made objects; this is the destruction of actual human beings. He uses this method to be able to grab onto the reader. If Remarque was only trying to tell a story, this use of blood and gore would not be necessary, but since he is trying to prove a point about the
The main reason for the stalemate was trench warfare. The development of technology made the trench more complex and difficult to breakthrough. A lot of new weapons were used in the trench warfare. First, there was a new weapon used called barbed wire. It was placed at the interval of each trench to protect the army from attack. It was so tough that nothing could break the barbed wire. This made it difficult for soldiers to cross over to the enemy’s trench. The second weapon that was used was artillery. It was used regularly in 1914. It could church up the ground and break down the formation behind the frontline. Also, the long range artillery fire was developed at that time. This type of artillery could fire from a place very far from the front line. Therefore, both countries made trenches which were deep enough for the soldiers to go underground and to conceal their bodies. The trenches could keep soldiers take cover from enemy fire. To b...
The Fighting on the Western Front as a War of Attrition The strategy and tactics that were employed on the Western Front are often describe as, 'attrition'; the need to put one's whole human and mechanical resources to wear down the enemy. The Fighting on the western front consisted of advanced technological warfare that relied heavily upon artillery, machine guns, tanks and gas, which characterises a 'war of attrition'. Source 19.J indicates the importance of firepower in winning battles whilst source 19.K further compliments the idea of a 'war of attrition' by depicting the emphasis placed upon tanks despite their apparent initial failure. The western front was too represented by the common held and often out-dated belief that numerical manpower would prove to be the determining factor in victory.
World War I had been fought primarily on French soil, and the military as well as the government never wanted that to happen again, therefore they wanted to reinforce their main border against any future German. Little did they know that only twenty-two years later they would be bested by German forces in a way that would shock the world.... ... middle of paper ... ... Situational awareness was almost non-existent, with many French commanders not even knowing where their own subordinate units were located.11
The viewing of All Quiet on the Western Front has widened by knowledge of World War 1, as I now understand an abundance more of how war was like. The film showed me how easy it was to die in war, as one simple mistake is all it takes. Many of Paul’s friends in the film perished, as they were mainly caused by amputations.
To truly understand the life of a soldier, one must go through the struggles of wartime combat. The reality of participating in war is that there is not only a physical aspect that changes a soldier, but mental aspects too. The Things They Carried and All Quiet On The Western Front both portray a number of similar topics. O’brien and Remarque interpret the speculation of wartime in dramatic yet necessary measures as betrayal of youth, the transformation of man to animal, and the horrors of war.
In 1914, what started as a dispute between several countries in Europe, including Germany, Great Britain, Russia, France, Austria- Hungary, and Serbia, eventually evolved into a world war, bringing in several other countries to fight such as the United States. Although World War One has no one clear reason as to why it started, the rise of nationalism within one's country, and the need to modernize and advance their military technology both increased the chances of a great war forming. After the war had ended, it left millions of people either dead, or mentally and physically injured. The novel All Quiet on the Western Front introduced the life of a young German soldier named Paul who had given up his past life to serve for his country. Although
The first month of the campaign began with successes and finished with defeats for the French troops. Under what circumstances did these come about? Our plan of concentration had foreseen the possibility of two principal actions, one on the right between the Vosges and the Moselle, the other on the left to the north of Verdun-Toul line, this double possibility involving the eventual variation of our transport. On August 2nd, owing to the Germans passing through Belgium, our concentration was substantially modified by Marshal Joffre in order that our principal effort might be directed to the north.
Although most Germans were mainly stationed at Pas-de-Calais, Hitler decided to pull some divisions from the Soviet Union forces to help change the new German strategy (Fein 7, 17). The Germans stayed at Pas-de-Calais because they believed the invasion would take place there due to the short distance across the English Channel (Fein 12). But, because the of the faults in their plan, the Allies struck Normandy, which had very few German divisions. As Hitler thought Normandy was a setup, he delayed moving troops which caused them to miss the chance of deploying their best forces (Demuth 92, bbc.co.uk). Because of this delay, German response to the invasion was slow and confused (iwm.org.uk). Whereas, if they had known, they could have had a focused counter-attack which would have increased their chances of winning. Actually, Hitler received false reports from the frontlines that they were probably going to win D-Day (Demuth 90). But what was happening was quite the opposite. Germany couldn’t get through Allied artillery and air strikes (Fein 25). The Germans were surrounded by Allied divisions. So, for the first time in Western Europe, Germany was in full retreat (Fein 27). Because of Germany’s mistakes, like army placement, miscommunications, and false reports, these all cost them the win of the most decisive battle of World War
David Coates said, “This is not our fight alone, nor is it our fight to lead.” The problems we are trying to fix should affect not just the US but also the countries around us. We should not stop being proud of our country but we also can't be stubborn. ISIS has threatened and attacked the United States and other countries as well. October 2016 This group of terrorists “downed a Russian passenger jet, killing all 224 people on board” (Karen). Two weeks after that a bus was driven through a crowd in Paris and “killed more than 100 people.”(Karen) These are only two instances these groups have directly attacked parts of the world. There are also many inspired killings for this radical group. We need to get together with these countries before
"This book is to be neither an accusation nor a confession, and least of all an adventure, for death is not an adventure to those who stand face to face with it. It will try simply to tell of a generation of men who, even though they may have escaped shells, were destroyed by the war."
In conclusion, the main aim of the Schlieffen Plan was for Germany to avoid fighting a war on two fronts at the same time. The Plan failed for a number of reasons, but the most important was the unexpected resistance put up by the brave Belgians at Mons and the support given by the BEF at the Battle of the Marne. This meant that von Moltke had to divert his armies from encircling Paris, dig trenches to protect his soldiers from the bombardment form the new artillery, and thereby negate the crux of the Schlieffen Plan, which had depended on speed, knocking out and capturing Paris in six weeks. The Germans found themselves stuck in France while the Russians had mobilized: The Germans then had to fight a war on two fronts - the very situation which the Schlieffen Plan had been devised to avoid.