The Crucible Conflict Analysis

482 Words1 Page

The Crucible There were many conflicts in the Crucible by Arthur Miller written in 1953. Many conflicts were between relationships between a couple or a group of people. Because others won’t forgive you until you forgive yourself; John will need to forgive himself and accept what he did, and then try and work things out with Elizabeth. John talks to Elizabeth about his affair with Abigail. When discussing what happened with Abigail, Elizabeth thinks Abigail feels ill toward her saying, “She thinks to kill me, and then take my place.” Elizabeth discusses with John about how she thinks Abigail feels towards her and she felt it was intentionally done to her. Elizabeth feels as though she was the one responsible for the affair, so she feels she is the …show more content…

She would start discussing why she thinks she’s not good enough and that she can’t find true love by saying, “I counted myself so plain, so poorly made, that no honest love could come to me.” This goes back to that by John doing this it doesn’t only affect him, but everyone around him as well. John may feel like he is the one that is responsible, but it leaves everyone else feeling like it’s their fault, because of this one decision made by John. By this moment, John realizes what he needs to do, to try and have Elizabeth forgive him for the sin that he has done with Abigail. Finally, John goes back to talk to Abigail about having to end the relationship between them. Very quickly John discusses with Abigail that he can’t continue what he was doing saying, “Abby, I may think of you softly from time to time, but I will cut off my hand before I reach for you again.” John doesn’t want to and can’t be involved with Abigail in a romantic way, therefore having to let Abigail go, so he can fix his relationship with Elizabeth. This is a result of John forgiving himself to try and fix the relationship with his wife,

Open Document