Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact on music piracy
Piracy destroy music industry essay
Piracy destroy music industry essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact on music piracy
Illegal downloading is causing billions of dollars in financial loses to the music industry every year. "In the decade since Napster emerged, music sales in the U.S. have dropped 47 percent, from $14.6 billion to $7.7 billion. From 2004 through 2009 alone, approximately 30 billion songs were illegally downloaded on file-sharing networks” ("Students"). In 1999, Napster hit the scene with a peer-to-peer file sharing application that transformed the world. Within a year, millions of people were trading songs from a simple download. It didn't take long for Metallica to take legal action against Napster and to ban users from access. After the RIAA joined in with many other groups and bands filing numerous infringement suits, Napster was forced to shut down in 2001 (Mason). This opened the door; in the next few years, P2P networks and file sharing across the world grew exponentially. In 2002, many sites and applications like eDonkey, Kazaa, and Morpheus made pirating music easy. Bit Torrents shadowed soon after, and sites such as The Pirate Bay, Torrent Reactor and TorrentSpy became very popular. As file sharing grew, so did legal actions and the malware that infested these files. Experiencing the same fate as Napster, many sites were being shut down. In 2006, police raided The Pirate Bay and temporarily disabled their servers. It took the Swedish government three more years and in 2009, the members were fined and imprisoned for copyright infringement violations. Downloading music for free is very costly to the music industry; it violates domestic and international laws; and you become vulnerable to computer malware.
"As a consequence of global and U.S.-based piracy of sound recordings, the U.S. economy loses $12.5 billio...
... middle of paper ...
...egal downloads" The Guardian, 21 Jul. 2009. Web. 23 Oct. 2011.
Douglas, Kathy. "How are illegal downloads damaging the record labels and overall music industry?" Zintro, 07 Jan. 2011. Web. 23 Oct. 2011.
"International Federation of the Phonographic Industry." Wikipedia, 23 Oct. 2011. Web. 23 Oct. 2011.
Lindvall, Helienne. "IFPI music report dispels the myths surrounding piracy." The Guardian, 20 Jan. 2011. Web. 30 Oct. 2011.
Mason, Moya. "Early History of Napster" Web. 23 Oct. 2011.
Metz, Cade. “MyDoom Virus, Kazaa and the Dangers of Peer-to-Peer.” PCMagizine, 28 Jan. 2004. Web. 15 Oct. 2011.
"Rogue security software." Wikipedia, 12 Sep. 2011. Web. 23 Oct. 2011.
Siwek, Stephen. "The True Cost of Sound Recording Piracy to the U.S. Economy" IPI, 21 Aug. 2007. Web 23 Oct. 2011.
"Students Doing Reports." RIAA, Web. 23 Oct. 2011.
Singers and songwriters need to make a living somehow. They know that downloading music is a way to get their voice heard, but they also know that it is significantly hurting the business. "When your product is being regularly stolen, there comes a time when you have to take appropriate action," said RIAA president Cary Sherman (RIAA 1). There are a lot of people involved in the music scheme when it comes to who needs to get paid by the revenue. From the sale of one CD, singers get one small fraction of the cost, another fraction goes to song writers, musicians also get some of the profit along with retailers, engineers, technicians, warehouse working, and ever...
We have all watched over the last year and a half as the controversy over the digital music provider Napster has clogged our television screens and lined our floors in the forms of newspaper articles. We are also well aware of the implications and revenue losses that the service either directly or indirectly causes. What I am going to investigate more in-depth in this article is, more specifically, the effect that Napster has on the operations of record stores worldwide. I am going to try to describe the most profound effects that Napster has on this industry.
The Web. 26 Feb. 2014. https://www.riaa.com/physicalpiracy.php?content_selector=piracy_online_the_law>. Lindvall, Helienne. Music Streaming:
Witherbee, Amy, and Marlanda English. “Music Piracy Costs Billions.” Points of View Reference Senter. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2014.
Recently, there has been a series of copyright infringement litigations against Internet businesses that are involved with unauthorized distribution of music files. The US recording industry claims to lose three million dollars per year because of piracy. A report predicted an estimated 16 percent of all US music sales, or 985 million dollars would be lost due to online piracy by 2002 (Foege, 2000; cited from McCourt & Burkart, 2003) Even though this claim has to be taken with caution, as it is based on false assumption that if copyright laws were strictly enforced, audio pirates would become buyers, it is apparent that audio piracy grew to a worrisome level for the record industry. (Gayer & Shy, 2003)
Big time record companies and artist are losing billions of dollars due to people illegally downloading music files. The
It is first beneficial to know the definition of piracy. Piracy has been characterized multiple ways from multiple disciplines. For the purpose of this paper, I will apply the definition of piracy from the 1982 United ...
An “analyst” was quoted in the case (in 2002) as saying that “people will pay for music on the Internet, eventually.” This person was skeptical of the willingness of consumers to pay for
"4 Ways In Which Internet Piracy Can Be a Good Thing." MakeUseOf. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Apr. 2014.
The story really begins with Napster and its free software that allowed users to swap music across the Internet for free using peer-to-peer networks. While Shawn Fanning was attending Northeastern University in Boston, he wanted an easier method of finding music than by searching IRC or Lycos. John Fanning of Hull, Massachusetts, who is Shawn's uncle, struck an agreement which gave Shawn 30% control of the company, with the rest going to his uncle. Napster began to build an office and executive team in San Mateo, California, in September of 1999. Napster was the first of the massively popular peer-to-peer file sharing systems, although it was not fully peer-to-peer since it used central servers to maintain lists of connected systems and the files they provideddirectories, effectivelywhile actual transactions were conducted directly between machines. Although there were already media which facilitated the sharing of files across the Internet, such as IRC, Hotline, and USENET, Napster specialized exclusively in music in the form of MP3 files and presented a user-friendly interface. The result was a system whose popularity generated an enormous selection of music to download. Napster became the launching pad for the explosive growth of the MP3 format and the proliferation of unlicensed copyrights.
Physical piracy-the copying and illegal sale of hard-copy CDs, videotapes, and DVDs-costs the music industry over $4 billion a year worldwide and the movie industry more than $3.5 billion. These numbers do not factor in the growing (and difficult to measure) problem of Internet piracy, in which music and movies are transferred to digital format and copies are made of the resulting computer file. Journalist Charles C. Mann explains why Internet piracy has the potential to be vastly more damaging to copyright industr...
Online piracy is a huge problem, one which costs the U.S. economy between $200 and $250 billion per year, and is responsible for the loss of 750,000 American jobs. These numbers seem huge: $250 billion per year loss would be almost $800 for every man, woman, and child in America. And 750,000 jobs – that’s twice the number of those employed in the entire motion picture industry in 2010 (Freakonomics). In 2010, the Government Accountability Office released a report noting that these figures “can be substantiated or traced back to an underlying data source or methodology,” which in English means these figures are legitimate and that piracy really does hurt our economy.
The first reason why downloading and uploading copyrighted materials from the Internet should be legal is that downloading copyrighted materials positively affects the economy. The European Commission Joint Research Center reported that the profits of music companies would be 2% lower if uploading and downloading copyrighted materials were banned. However, music companies are able to acquire more profits despite illegal downloading because many people tend to purchase CDs or DVDs after watching or listening to copyrighted materials for free. Moreover, the research showed that people who download music illegally spent more money to buy music than people who did not download illegally. In addition, research conducted by the Swiss government informed that one-third of Swiss people downloaded copyrighted materials from the Internet because personal use of copyrighted materials is legal in Switzerland. Even though there is a fact that many people can download copyrighted materials from the Internet legally in Switzerland, the amount of money that people spend to buy copyrighted materials is not f...
Castle, Frank. Pros & Cons of Free Music. Article Alley. 10th January 2011. Web. 10th January
Music piracy is a developing problem that it affects the music industry in many different ways including being responsible for the unemployment of 750,000 workers, as well as a loss of $2,5 billion; therefore, I want to explore ‘To what extent has music piracy affected the music industry market in the United States over the last 10 years?’