The Cask Of Amontillado And The Tell Tale Heart Analysis

When reading any of Edgar Allen Poe’s works, the reader can almost expect a reoccurring theme that focuses on the questionable sanity of the narrator and the overwhelming presence of death that drives the story to its resolve. The two stories being compared are no exception to this theme as both are built upon the thought driven narrative of a seemingly mad man with a fervor for revenge. In both stories the reader is told of the main character, “The Cask of Amontillado” gives us Montresor and “The Tell-Tale Heart” is simply the narrator of the story, who seek out a character to murder for vague reasons not fully explained to the reader in a way that builds a picture of the way their mind works. As both dictate how and why they plan to commit their crimes, the inner monologue that is provided by a first person narrative paints a picture of the unstable emotional state and irrational thought process that gives the reader insight to how unreliable their account of the story actually is. This unreliable narrative leaves the story open to interpretation on whether or not the act of murder was committed righteously, or simply just the misguided actions of two insane characters.
The careful and meticulous planning of the murders committed in both stories show a similarity between the minds of the two main characters. In “The Cask of Amontillado”, Montresor constructs his plot to take place around the time of the carnival and makes a note of how he told his attendants that he “should not return until the morning and had given them explicit orders not to stir from the house.” (Kirszner & Mandell 191) With the act of dismissing his people to enjoy the night, Montresor creates an environment to carry out his deed without any witnesses. Mont...

... middle of paper ...

...t makes a point to show that Montresor feels that if Fortunato discovers his act of vengeance, he is just as bad as Fortunato. The narrator takes a similar approach in stating how he is calm in recounting the story of how he went about murdering the old man, and how “Whenever (the eye) fell upon (him), (His) blood ran cold; and so by degrees –very gradually- (he) made up (his) mind to take the life of the old man, and this rid (himself) of the eye forever.” (Kirszner & Mandell 331) By stating why the narrator feels the eye has wronged him, he is trying to provide a good reason behind ending the life of an innocent old man. Both of these men provide constant reassurance to not only themselves, but also the reader, that the acts they are committing are done in a way that gives each of them a clear conscious and ability to accept what was done as the right thing to do.