Liquidity measures a company's capacity to pay its debts as they come due. However, Wal-Mart’s current ratio is 0.93, Target current ratio is 1.11 and the industry ratio is 3.04, which is much higher, so I would say that it is good but needs improvement. The quick ratio for Wal-Mart is 1.04 and Target’s quick ratio is 0.21 and the industry ratio is 0.31, which is much higher. Wal-Mart’s is higher and needs some improvement and Target’s is good. Accounts receivable for Wal-Mart is 9 days and Target’s is 6 days, whereas an estimate for the industry is 17 days, which means that both of them are doing better than the industry standards. Target’s inventory ratio is 6.04 and Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio is 0.81, and the industry ratio 1.58. These numbers shows that Wal-Mart is good but Target needs improvement. Furthermore, based on this analysis, I would say that Wal-Mart and Target are doing well but both have areas that need improvement. …show more content…
Efficiency evaluates how well the company manages its assets. Besides determining the value of the company's assets, you and your client should also analyze how effectively the company employs its assets. Wal-Mart return on sales is 3%, Target return of sales are 1%, the industry ratio is 2%. Wal-Mart sales are above the industry and are good, but Target is below and needs improvement to operate efficiently. Wal-Mart’s return on asset was 1 and Target’s is 2, and the industry ratio 1.92.Wal-Mart’s is below and need improvement and Target’s is excellent. Earning per share for Walmart is 25 and Target’s is 63.1 and the industry is 59.1. Since Wal-Mart’s is lower they need improvement, whereas Target’s is a little higher and is good but closer to the industry
Corporations keep various types of financial records and it is the responsibility of managers to make sure that the records are maintained and resolved at the end of the fiscal year. Most company has shareholders that want a year-end account on how the company has done and with a projection of what the company is capable of doing in the future. The shareholders have a vested interest and want to be kept informed on how the company is doing financially. Financial records for major corporations are public knowledge and this paper is comparing Target and Wal-Mart and their financial standings.
Analyzing Wal-Mart's annual report provides a positive outlook on Wal-Mart's financial health. Given the specific ratios and its comparison to other companies in the same industry, Wal-Mart is leading and more than likely continue its dominance. Though Wal-Mart did not lead in all numbers, its leadership and strong presence of the market cements the ongoing success. The review of the current ratio, quick ratio, inventory turnover ratio, debt ratio, net profit margin ratio, ROI, ROE, and P/E ratio all indicate an upbeat future for the company. The current ratio, which is defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, is a measure of how much liabilities a company has compared to its assets. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a current ratio of .90, and as of January 2008 it had a current ratio of .81. The quick ratio, which is defined as current assets minus inventory divided by current liabilities, is a measure of a company's ability pay short term obligations. Wal-Mart in the year of 2007 had a quick ratio of .25, and as of January 2008 it had a ratio of .21. Both the current ratio and quick ratio are a measure of liquidity. Wal-Mart is not as liquid as its competitors such as Costco or Family Dollar Stores Inc. I believe the reason why Wal-Mart is not too liquid is because they are heavily investing their profits for expansion and growth. Management claims in their financial report that holding their liquid reserves in other currencies have helped Wal-Mart hedge against inflationary pressures of the US dollar. The next ratio to look at is the inventory ratio which is defined as the cost of sales divided by average inventory. In the year of 2007, Wal-Mart’s inventory ratio was 7.68, and as of January 2008 it was 7.96. Wal-Mart has a lot of sales therefore it doesn’t have too much a problem of holding too much inventory. Its competitors have similar ratios though they don’t have as much sales as Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart’s ability to sell at lower prices for same quality, gives them the edge against its competition. As of the year 2007, Wal-Mart had a debt ratio of .58, and as of January 2008, it had a debt ratio of .59. The debt ratio is calculated by dividing the total debt by its total assets. Wal-Mart has a lot more assets than it does debt so Wal-Mart is not overleveraged.
Looking at the individual ratios seen in exhibit 1 and comparing it to the industry average shown in exhibit 2 gives a sense of where this company stands. Current ratio and quick ratio are really low and have been decreasing. For 1995, the current ratio is 1.15:1, which is less than the industry average of 1.60:1, however to give a better sense of where this stands in the industry, as seen in exhibit 3, it is actually less than the average of the bottom 25% of the industry. The quick ratio is 0.61 is less than the industry is 0.90. Both these ratios serve to point out the lack of cash in this company. The cash flow has been decreasing because, it takes longer to get the money from customers, but the company still needs to pay for its purchases. Also, the company couldn’t go over the $400,000 loan limit, so they were forced to stretch their cash.
The first method we will review is the accounting method. Through this accounting approach we will analyze specific ratios and their possible impact on the company's performance. The specific ratios we will review include the return on total assets, return on equity, gross profit margin, earnings per share, price earnings ratio, debt to assets, debt to equity, accounts receivable turnover, total asset turnover, fixed asset turnover, and average collection period. I will explain each ratio in greater detail, and why I have included it in this analysis, when I give the results of each specific ratio calculation.
The efficiency ratios are a mix of positive and negative aspects for the company. The asset turnover ratio has improved drastically over a period of 5 years. For an investment of $1, the company is able to produce $2 of sales revenue. Although the efficiency ratio may be positive, it is n...
If a bank wanted to look at the big picture when making their decision to give out loan to a company, they would look at the Cash Ratio, because cash is the most important of all assets, it provides the bank or creditor an idea of the likelihood of the company being able to pay them back on the loan. In the comparison between Home Depot and Lowe’s we find that the trends are very similar to the quick ratio with Home Depot having more cash to cover its liabilities than Lowe’s. As expected, the cash ratios are lower than the quick ratios, because short-term investments and receivables are taken out of the equation. Over the past six years, both companies’ cash ratios have been declining with an average of 0.186 for Home Depot while the average
For both companies, the debit to asset ratio decreased over time. For both years though, Walgreens had less liabilities compared to assets. In the long term this is good. A company needs to be able to have little debt and something to fall back on such as assets when times are tough. This shows solvency, the capability of a business
The Dupont analysis includes the asset turnover ratio, the profit margin percantage, return on shareholder’s equity percentage, return on assets, and the equity multiplier (Spiceland, Sepe, and Nelson 258-264). The asset turnover ratio is the amount of revenue received for every one dollar of assets, it reveals how efficiently the company is distributing assets. Apple’s asset turnover ratio is 60.43 which means for every one dollar Apple has in assets, they receive approximately sixty cents (Apple Inc). Microsoft’s asset turnover ratio is 13.17 so for every dollar they only receive about thirteen cents (Microsoft Inc). Apple is doing significantly better in this category. The profit margin is just how much of a company’s sales they keep as a profit. Apple’s profit margin is 21.67% while Microsoft has a 28% profit margin so Microsoft is accumulating more profit off each sale but their sales are lower. The return on shar...
Overall, Horizontal analysis and financial ratios are essential factors that businesses use to monitor its liquidity. Therefore, in order to improve Apple’s ratios and profitability, the company needs to implement a strategy to increase the company’s liquidity. Business owners or managers should monitor current ratio and acid test ratio as these ratios help us to ensure the company has the proper liquid assets to pay current liabilities, to stay in operations and to expand the company. As we noted in our acid test ratio and current ratio for the company, we show a lower ratio for acid test ratio than the current ratio, which means that the company’s current assets rely on inventory. Therefore, the company needs to convert old inventory into
In regards to the corporation’s balance sheet, it is necessary to place an importance on liquidity ratios to demonstrate the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations such as accounts payable and notes that have a duration of less than one year. These commonly used liquidity ratios include the current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio. All three ratios are used to measure the liquidity of a company or business. The current ratio is used to indicate a business’s ability to meet maturing obligations. The quick ratio is used to indicate the company’s ability to pay off debt. Finally the cash ratio is used to measure the amount of capital as well short term counterparts a business has over its current liabilities.
Financial statements are a formal record of financial activities. During this 10-K report of financial analysis, we provided an overview of the Balance Sheet and Income Statement. The financial statement also overviewed what we analyzed comparing two major affordable retail companies such as Wal-Mart and Target. The information resulted in accurate information provided by the Security Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC information gave us insight to analyze the two retails financial condition that involved both short and long-term, income and expense, and assets and liabilities. This insight is an important tool for investors in assessing Wal-Mart and Target overall position in the market place. From what it owes and owns as well the
Ratio analysis are useful tools when judging the performance of a company by weighing and evaluating the operating performance (Block-Hirt). There are 13 significant ratios that can separate by four main categories, profitability, asset utilization, liquidity and debt utilization ratios. The ratio analysis covered here consists of eight various ratios with at least one from each of these main categories. These ratios were used to compare and contrast the performance of Verizon versus AT& T over the years 2005 and 2006.
Ratios traditionally measure the most important factors such as liquidity, solvency and profitability, as well as other measures of solvency. Different studies have found various ratios to be the most efficient indicators of solvency. Studies of ratio analysis began in the 1930’s, with several studies of the concluding that firms with the potential to file bankruptcy all exhibited different ratios than those companies that were financially sound. Among the study’s findings were that the deciding factor of the predictor of bankruptcy should not be only a few ratios, as the measure of a company’s financial solvency may differ as the firm’s situations differ. The important question is to which ratios are to be used and of those ratios chosen, which ratios are given priority weight.
Looking at the ratio (total liabilities / assets) of both companies is evident in the case of Sears a ratio of 5.93 times, while in Wal-Mart, of 1.38 times. For the foregoing and in view of the increased risk associated with debt, the profitability required by the shareholders at Sears should be greater than that required to Wal-Mart.
Organization performance is the performance effectiveness and the performance efficiency. The performance effectiveness is the measure of the task or goal accomplishment, it would be to what degree of a goal achieve. Managers who chose the right goals and achieve it can be say performance effectiveness. Besides, the performance efficiency is the measure of the resource cost associated for the goals, it would be how much of the resources are used and how productivity of resources. The more time and resources are saved in achieving goals, the most efficient production supervisor is.