Synthetic Nature In Richard Louv's Last Child In The Woods

533 Words2 Pages

To Richard Louv, ‘the logical extension of synthetic nature is the irrelevance of “true” nature.’ Written in 2008, Last Child in the Woods conveys Louv’s perspective on “synthetic nature” vs. ‘“true” nature’ and attempts to prove, to readers, how real nature is being overlooked. In order to tactfully expose how the increase of man-made nature is diminishing the beauty of actual nature, Louv employs the use of details, language, and imagery. Louv begins by presenting details and examples of how researchers and advertisers are attempting to add their mark on nature, therefore, in an essence, ignoring the real nature that already exists. By stating that “advertisers already stamp their messages into the wet sand” and quoting Matt Richtel, Louv provides details that set the stage for what he is preparing to argue. He shows how prevalent this issue is becoming in order to give readers a sense of why they should care about this particular topic. It is through this information that Louv strengthens his argument, considering he will alter emphasize on how these advancements are not necessarily wrong, but simply resulting in ‘the irrelevance of …show more content…

At the beginning of paragraph three, he questions why “many people no longer consider the physical world worth watching?” Through this question, he requires the reader to ponder something that they themselves may do, and he establishes a remorseful tone, portraying his personal concern for the topic. In a way, one feels obligated to at least consider what Louv is implying, if only for the reason that he has managed to capture emotions one may have towards the subject. However, he still maintains a formal voice throughout his writing, as to not lose respect or merit. Overall, the language used is packed full of logic yet retains a personal viewpoint that supports the logical

Open Document