preview

Symbolism in The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov

analytical Essay
1577 words
1577 words
bookmark

Symbolism in The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov

Mamma! Are you crying, mamma? My dear, good, sweet mamma! Darling, I love you! I bless you! The Cherry orchard is sold; it?s gone; its quite true, it?s quite true. But don?t cry, mamma, you?ve still got life before you, you?ve still got your pure and lovely soul. Come with me, darling, and come away from here. We?ll plant a new garden, still lovelier than this. You will see it and understand, and happiness, deep, tranquil happiness will sink down on your soul, like the sun at eventide, and you?ll smile, mamma. Come, darling, come with me!

The Cherry Orchard has been acclaimed as one of the greatest theatrical experiences of all time. It is clearly seen through the use of the more subtle, submerged, and persuasive techniques that he uses in writing this, his most famous play. The Cherry Orchard is important for three reasons: First, for its intrinsic textual richness, linguistic power and subtlety as a piece of dramatic prose; second, because of its crucial position in Russian cultural history as the culmination of all ?realist? nineteenth-century fiction and as the first classic of a new, arguably ?symbolist? or ?absurd? literature; third, because of its seminal role in the evolution of Twentieth-Century theater.

The plot structure in The Cherry Orchard is not as meaningful as the impact of events on the inner sensibilities of the characters. Chekhov divides his characters in The Cherry Orchard in a variety of ways so that the orchard and its sale take on different meaning for each of them. It is necessary then to examine the loss of the cherry through some of the major character; Yermolai Alexeyitch Lopakhin, Peter Trophimot, and Madame Ranevsky. When writing TCO he us...

... middle of paper ...

...and repression; by Lopakhin, the business man and spokesman for hard economic facts, the one who thinks of it primarily as a means to a wiser investment, and by Madame Ranvesky, who sees in it her childhood happiness; it is seen from these characters that are woven by their brilliant selection.

Thus, The Cherry Orchard is simplistic, yet complicated at the same time. It has poetic strength and is naturalistically composed, which makes it all the more controversial. The interweaving in the play, the relationships between one generation and another, between the sexes, and ranking of different social classes add to The Cherry Orchard?s interesting balance. It is not hard for one to see why The Cherry Orchard is considered to be Anton Chekhov?s greatest work, and why it shall remain a classic for many years to come.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes the symbolism in the cherry orchard by anton chekhov.
  • Analyzes how the cherry orchard is acclaimed as one of the greatest theatrical experiences of all time. it is important for its textual richness, linguistic power, and subtlety as a piece of dramatic prose.
  • Analyzes how chekhov divides his characters in the cherry orchard in a variety of ways, examining the loss of the cherry through yermolai alexeyitch lopakhin, peter trophimot, and madame ranevsky.
  • Explains that the cherry orchard was composed during the years 1903-1904 while chekhov was dying of tuberculosis. it was first produced on january 17, 1904 by the moscow arts theater, on the twenty-fifth anniversary of his career.
  • Analyzes how anton chekhov conceived the cherry orchard as a comedy, but had trouble persuading people it wasn't drama. the play aligns the action with time, from hopeful spring to despairing autumn.
  • Opines that all of russia is our garden. the earth is great and beautiful; it is full of wonderful places.
  • Analyzes how peter views the orchard as nothing but an image of slavery and repression. trophimof experiences the loss of privileged class being demoted to the whole russia people.
  • Compares the views of lopahkin and trophimof according to their sex and social standings.
  • Opines that if only their father and grandfather could raise from their graves and see the whole affair, how their flogged and ignorant yermolai bought a property that hasn't its equal for beauty anywhere in the world!
  • Explains that lopakhin is a self-made businessman who came along way from his childhood and family of being poor peasant.
  • Analyzes how yermolai lopakhin and peter trophimof's views are similar in some retrospect. by sex, departure from the orchard means an assesment of marital needs.
  • Opines that mankind marches possible on earth, and they march in the foremost ranks.
  • Analyzes how trophimof refuses lopakhin's loan offer, which shows how the student?s youth and idealism are in pathetic contrast with
  • Analyzes how madame ranevsky sees the orchard as an ambiguous and poetic symbol of any human life that is in a state of change.
  • Narrates how they squandered money and married a man who made nothing but debts. the sick man tormented and wore down their soul.
  • Analyzes how the cherry orchard represents an inextricable tangle of sentiments, which together compromise a way of life and an attitude to life.
  • Analyzes how the cherry orchard is simplistic yet complicated at the same time. the interweaving in the play, the relationships between one generation and another, between the sexes, and ranking of different social classes add to its interesting balance.
Get Access