Summary Of The Singer Solution To World Poverty

In a New York Times Magazine article titled “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics, called attention to the needs of people around the world by proposing a plan to fix this problem. Dubbed the “Singer Solution,” Singer believes donations from the wealthy to overseas aid organizations can end world poverty, a problem the world has wrestled with for centuries. While the Singer Solution may seem like a wonderful idea on paper, it is in reality impossible to implement and ultimately hurts the needy.

World poverty is indeed an important issue in today’s society, especially since there has been an increasing need for the basic needs: food, medicine, and housing. The Singer Solution could help provide supplies to aid the “urgent needs” of people, such as those who lost their homes because of a natural disaster. For example, after the Haiti earthquake in 2010, more than one million people were displaced. The earthquake destroyed most of Haiti’s crops and supplies, leaving the entire country in havoc. Thankfully, aid organizations, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization, jumped in to help rebuild

There is a huge difference between someone who simply goes does the same thing everyday and someone who lives life to its fullest by trying different and unique “luxuries.” If everyone lived only on the bare necessities, this could result in severe consequences. Children are the future of America, and if they were to grow up without exposure to art, music, and other “luxuries,” this would leave America barren and plain. Exposure to the arts and participating in extracurricular activities are important parts of a child’s life. These opportunities can encourage and prepare children for future jobs. If the Singer Solution did somehow happen to work, the negative repercussions far outweigh the few