Strand Vs Sheeler

868 Words2 Pages

Paul Strand and Charles Sheeler utilized extreme camera angles to seize Manhattan’s forceful and lively qualities. The intentionality of their work is key, their cameras aren’t free traveling. Paul Strand and Walter Benjamin’s camera position is not accidental. Where they set up the camera is not where something will happen, rather where the happenings take place, and turns the subjects of his work into narrators, where the camera acts as a listener. When they rearranged the position of the camera as opposed to the subjects, the pictures were freed in a sense, almost to a point where you could put all his pictures together and they’d transform from still life to abstraction.
In Paul Strand’s Essay “Photography and the New God” He references the camera as God the machine. “Thus the deeper significance of a machine, the camera has emerged here in America, the supreme altar of the new God.” (Strand 143) In the film Manhatta by Paul Strand and Charles Sheeler, we see Strand’s argument being fulfilled of the camera as …show more content…

Even though it’s a silent production, Manhatta seems to work on an intuitive level based on several examples from the film. The ability to understand that technology is taking over the world in a negative way is strongly portrayed through the dehumanizing aspects in the film. Going back to the construction workers, who are enslaved in the component of the machine, without saying a word describe the context of the film. Artists were in pursuit of intuitive knowledge which in the film, Strand and Sheeler used to foreworn of the effects of the scientists allowing themselves to be used for profit, and creating weapons and unjust ways of life that resulted in mankind reaching a point approaching

Open Document